Since SR2 was not wacky all the time like 3 is, there is an appropriate context for the humor and goofing around that you could do. It's the old idea that something ceases to be special if that's all you are experiencing.Smertnik said:True, I liked SR2 much more as well. From SR3 I got the feeling like it tried too hard being all wacky and craaazy while offering less content (especially in customisation and side mission department) and less memorable characters (as in none at all) and SR4 will probably go down the same road. I still had a lot of fun with the third installment and will presumably do so with the forth as well but SR2 just offered a superior experience in nearly every way, at least for me.King Aragorn said:I disagree. Saints Row 2 wasn't just good because of being ridiculous, but it had smart writing, good missions, etc along with the ridiculous elements. Saints Row 3 is just...
Beating people with dildos and that's it.
I can't wait for Watch_Dogs and GTAV to show these fools how a real sandbox game is done.