Was I alone when I felt gutpunched after what happened to(Carlos I believe?)King Aragorn said:Exactly. SR2 had that perfect balance, it didn't take itself seriously, yet at the same time, when it wanted to get something serious across, it could. And this doesn't just apply to the protag, but really the game in it's entirety.Exius Xavarus said:I preferred SR2 over SR3. SR2 can easily be very silly, but it also has a much more serious tone that SR3 lacks. Even in the most serious moments, SR3 felt like one big joke. It just wasn't serious. In SR2, the protag had this air about him that lets you know he does not fuck around. In SR3, he has the intellect and cunning of a full grown adult, but the mentality of one big ass teenager.King Aragorn said:I disagree. Saints Row 2 wasn't just good because of being ridiculous, but it had smart writing, good missions, etc along with the ridiculous elements. Saints Row 3 is just...
Beating people with dildos and that's it.
On another note, it s a shame that after the half assed third game, we get a fourth, yet DS dies..
After Maero drags him behind his truck. I was thinking he'd be okay, probably maimed badly but would live. Then my character pulls out his gun and I almost shed a tear.