Salem Dev: MMOs Without Permadeath Aren't Proper Games

[1337mokro]

Permadeath is acceptable in TWO instances.

1: Death is not an ever present event. It is hard to die unless a person takes risks. Basically imagine a D&D game where the PC's sit in the tavern for the entire campaign. If they still die it makes no sense. If they die because they took on a challenge they KNEW would be hard or because they were stupid then the death is warranted.

2: If the time investment is not centered around the character. For example you COULD get a new character and go get the loot from your previous dead body. You could attempt to reclaim lost property or take revenge on what or who killed you. However the point here is that the time spent between death and being able to achieve any such goals is minimal. Losing a lvl 80 character because of permadeath would be unacceptable simply because of the immense timesink that character was.

Now the two aren't mutually exclusive. You can adhere to point 1 and ignore point 2 or combine em. Point is that the game cannot be designed around trying to kill the player as much as possible. Then you have a bad game, wait no you have an arcade cabinet.

In short if you have random performing raids on your village in Salem resulting in massacres, you won't have any players left at the end of this week but the extreme diehards. If you say have a special forest that is labeled Death Burrows and someone still goes there in search of rare shit and dies, then you have a good permadeath system.

Ultima had extreme PvP, Ultima also didn't have permadeath. Why? Because players would form grieving groups and wait outside cities. Basically making it impossible for a low level character to go anywhere. Most of em did and got killed.

 

[Erttheking]

Permenant deaths don't always work. They're great in X-COM, but the iron skull in Halo is bullshit.

 

[Steven Bogos]

MMO Permadeath is approaching Adam Orth levels of stupidity in the real world.

"Oh your ISP lagged, or your connection dropped killing your high level charactter? #Dealwithit"

Some might appreciate it even though, but not me.

I actually vastly appreciate this statement. Blizzard have had this rule since the days of Diablo II hardcore (In the diablo II manual, it says "we don't care if your ISP died, you had a blackout, or your little sister unplugged your net cable, we will not restore hardcore characters under ANY circumstances") being so upfront about this means that players know EXACTLY what they are getting into.

The problem with restoring permadeath characters is it lends itself to abuse. How can Blizzard tell a legitimate "i tripped over my power cord" versus "I bit off more than I could chew and died and want a second chance"?

 

[FalloutJack]

Permanent death? Hmmmm... Well, let's ask the star of Sword Art Online about how well THAT works out. Kirito?

Kirito: It sucks. It's the most terrifying and horrible experience in my life and I still have nightmares about it.

Well, there you have it, folks. Perma-death in an MMO is the spawn of Satan. Good day!

 

[DarkhoIlow]

I don't find the allure of permadeath interesting at all, especially in an MMO. This is why I usually steer clear of "hardcore modes" in general that include that.

If I am about to invest a very long time in a character, I don't want all my hard work and hours put into it to be washed away just because I either did a mistake or something that wasn't in my power to avoid killed me.

Look at Path of Exile hardcore league, so many deaths happening due to that desync, it's insane.

I am not a masochist to waste my nerves by attempting to play a game with a permadeath. If I want a challenge, I just up the difficulty but that is about it for me.

 

[Snowblindblitz]

Of course it's free to play. I'm not going to pay a subscription to re-buy your game every time I have to deal with, oh, the usual people in PVP focused MMOs.

Imagine some of the people who play EVE online moving to this. Griefing on a whole new level. There would be no co-operation in this game, sheer paranoia once you get past the early stages will drive you kill almost everyone you meet.

 

[WanderingFool]

Permanent death? Hmmmm... Well, let's ask the star of Sword Art Online about how well THAT works out. Kirito?

Kirito: It sucks. It's the most terrifying and horrible experience in my life and I still have nightmares about it.

Well, there you have it, folks. Perma-death in an MMO is the spawn of Satan. Good day!

I dont know what the hell the first part of your post means, but I agree with the spirit of it. Im not against the idea of Permadeath, played a few games with it in place, but they were all single player games, as well as games that took maybe an hour to beat and ran on the idea of multiple playthroughs (FTL, for example.)

But Permadeath in a PVP MMO? Say goodbye to that player base.

 

[dragongit]

Hey, guess what Salem devs, if I am able to die after all the progress I make, I'm not going to sink a dime into the game.

If it were quick and easy like that god of madness game, then there is no harm to dieing and trying again. otherwise I'm not going to bust my balls. Demons Souls was a ***** already, I'm not going to do it for an MMO.

 

[Atmos Duality]

So all I learned from this is that a particular developer is possibly into virtual S&M; because you'd have to be a sadistic asshole or a diehard masochist to enjoy the prospect of permadeath in any online game let alone an MMO.

 

[Therumancer]

This actually sounds pretty fun, until we inevitably get that one guy that kills players for the ducks of it.

My guess is three minutes before a witch hunt starts.

Well the thing is it won't be one dude that does it, it will be a large, well organized group of people that do it. As Ultima Online pointed out, community policing really doesn't work in an MMO enviroment, especially seeing as the guys that are trying to do their own thing and getting ganked generally don't want to drop whatever they are doing and become full time PVPers themselves just to try and keep things safe.

I do tend to agree with the general sentiments that success in games should not be guaranteed, they should take a degree of effort to progress and win, and there should be points where if your not good/successful enough you just don't get to progress... period. That said permadeath in an MMO is a really bad idea due to the reliance on connection speeds, lags, bugs, exploits, etc... not to mention that in an MMO you want a persistant community and people to want to keep coming back in to work on their projects. People are going to get bored if the game is a matter of dying and restarting a bunch of times and just seeing the same exact stuff again and again.

Roguelikes get around this problem by being hardcore, and having permadeath, but also by being simplistic enough to have crazy amounts of raw potential content, randomization, and most importantly, not being online or having to worry aboiut other players finding ways to cheat, exploit, or just ream you with a better connection, when you die it's usually because of something you did playing the game and can learn from it. If your connection hiccups, or some dude shows up with a better internet connection and wastes you, there is nothing you can really learn from that experience, your character just died because of something entirely beyond your control.

That said, it is an interesting idea, but one that I don't think will work very well.

Oh and one important caveat... I'd imagine the dev is lying about "Permadeath" in the game by having designed things so it's not quite what it sounds like. For example the current "ultimate hardcore MMO" Wizardry Online, has a "permadeath" system but what it actually does is kills your current avatar, your soul, which is your account, that continues to advance as you play avatars/characters remains and directly influances what you can do with your avatars. The soul is more or less your character, and it's progress never dies or resets. So yeah, your favorite level 20 warrior might die in the dungeon, and perhaps quite easily, and not be recoverable, BUT all the power you accumulated for your soul is still there, so the next warrior you create is hardly going to be the mewling newb someone brand new to the game created. You simply have to think about progress in the game differantly... that said I did not much care for
Wizardry Online. Sad because I was a huge fan of the "Wizardry" single player games.

I could be wrong about the above of course, but in general when I see people hyping permadeath mechanics it rarely seems to be what it claims.

 

[AdmiralCheez]

The few times I've tried PvP in MMO's has always ended with me getting killed by higher level players that buff-stack out the wazoo, with maxed out weapons and armor. The fight lasted about four seconds, six if I was lucky. So, combine this with permadeath, and you have no sale for me.

Unless Salem has low end goals, and permadeath doesn't mean twenty hours wasted, I don't see it keeping an audience very long. In fact, I can see it becoming a game for griefers very easily.

As for Johannessen's opinion on things like "save points," I'd like to see him play through any modern game in one playthrough without dying. If he's so "hardcore," then I expect him to quit and select New Game from the menu every time he dies.

 

[WouldYouKindly]

Welp, interesting idea, but I personally think he sounds like an elitist asshole, which kinda sours me on the whole plan.

Refining the idea a bit, it might work like in Day Z. My understanding is that when you kill enough of your fellow survivors you become a bandit and everyone becomes hostile to you. They can even detect this with a simple mechanic. Put something similar in and it would make it easier to avoid pricks. I still don't really see it as that great an idea.

 

[orangeban]

That's just moronic. Firstly, a lack of permadeath and the presence of save points do not make a game "easy", case-in-point, Dark Souls.

But also, there's nothing inherently awesome about difficulty. Yeah, you get a big man-boner when you can win and no-one else can, but that's just feeding your ego, it says nothing really about the quality of the game. So what if lots of people can win your game? That's like saying, "Bah, books aren't written in Beowulf era English these days, there's no challenge, anyone can read them!"

 

[weirdee]

Has that dev ever played an MMO with PvP? Ever get ganked by a group of players that do it just because they think its funny? The idea of permanent death in an MMO is a really really bad idea! ganking is a popular pastime for many players and its bad enough having to spawn and then need to gather a large group to get past the gankers just so you can get to where your quest is at. The idea just doesnt sound very fun to me when you will need to start over from the very begining in an MMO. Last man standing in an FPS would be reasonable.

Seriously though MMO is like going to a store called Assholes R Us for PvP and permanent death would just make the game itself permanently dead inside of a month.

They have their first game up (Haven and Hearth) and they've already seen all of the issues you're talking about.

There are roving gangs of trolls. There are also large communities of friendly players. The game has been carefully arranged so that the interplay between barbarian and settler is evenly balanced. Either side can't really dominate the other without effort, so it's not all one-sided all the time.

I think they know what they're doing. (the combat system is complex and ridiculous, though)

 

[FalloutJack]

Snippo!

Sword Art Online is an anime in which the players of a fully-interactive MMO have been locked into the game and can't escape until it's won. And if anyone tries to get them out OR...if anyone dies in the game...their headsets will fry their brains. That's the plot and I was mock-interviewing the main character as a joke. It's not a game if you die for real, or if the character can be destroyed forever.

 

[Canadamus Prime]

"Herp derp, a game that does/doesn't have ______ isn't a real game." ¬___¬
I started gaming during the NES era too and I found that having to restart the entire game from square one every time I got a game over was a pain in the ass so I was more than grateful for the advent of the save feature. Yeah I agree that games that have no real "You Lost" state really don't have any teeth, but come on being able to save your game doesn't really defang it that much.

 

[Something Amyss]

His actual statement isn't dickish, like the headline would make me think.

Fair enough. The risk of failure is measured individually. I don't need a "Game Over" screen, but I don't actively oppose them, either. However, in a game like an MMO, I think I'd rather have a persistent character.

And I don't like PVP.

 

[Karoshi]

Some games benefit from Permadeath and make them a lot more fun (Diablo 3), but MMOs with PvP aren't one of them. I love PvPing, I don't even mind getting ganked much since it make for fun hide-and-seek game. But open-world PvP with Permadeath? Ouch, that's definitely not for me. Seen my share of douchebags in MMOs, I know how this is gonna end.

 

[likalaruku]

Permanent death doesn't sound very fun to me and neither does PVP. Usually if an MMO makes PVP the central focus and that everyone is flagged for PVP that is an MMO I will never play because I hate PVP. I don't want to be forced to fight against other players.

Permanent deaths sounds OK in a game like Crusader Kings II where if your character dies you take over as the heir. In general though I most likely would not play a game or difficult level that made death permanent unless there was a secret ending of some sort.

Couldn't have said all that better myself.

 

[Monsterfurby]

Permadeath is "a" gameplay element among many. Not "the" definitive gameplay element (which doesn't exist).

Still, I like the idea of permadeath in MMOs, it appeals to the roleplayer in me. Then again, it must be implemented correctly. I remember a game being announced a long time ago where you would be able to play the child of your character should your first character die. I completely lost track of that one, though, and even forgot its title...