For me, lots of red ink meant "Get your game face on and kick ass..." Whats next? Teachers have to spend 3 weeks on simple multiplication and division because people think its too hard for children over the age of 12? The education systems need a swift boot up the ass, for real. I'm in college now, and while professurs don't tell you right out that you suck, they recomend that if you are failing you should either drop, or step up your game and take it seriously. If only more high school teachers were like that.Rin Little said:I wish I was kidding about this, but some schools in the U.K. have actually prohibited teachers from using red ink pens when correcting student assignments. They say the red ink is "demoralizing to students" and "making them do worse in school." Are you freaking kidding me?! Red ink makes sense to me because then you can actually see where the mistakes and markings are so you know where to fix mistakes! People need to stop being so freaking sensitive about everything. Coddling your kids all the way through school isn't going to do shit for them. If they're doing bad then they're doing bad and you're not helping them by making it easier for them to handle.
Here's the link if anyone wants to read the article to make sure I'm not bullshitting...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1101790/Teachers-banned-using-confrontational-red-ink-case-upsets-children.html
SillyBear said:If these kids are crying over red ink, they're very likely going to turn out to be worthless man-children. You coddle something and it expects to be coddled. You can't get anywhere in life like that, unless you're incredibly lucky.
PhoenixFlame said:What I really just disagree with you on is the degree to which you don't think this is a big deal or is not overboard. As someone who had to teach a few semesters of basic composition courses in college for his degree, I know that you're obligated to teach your students right from wrong in order to give them a baseline of correct writing behaviors and styles that help them survive more complex paper assignments. Using color as a means to coddle students into being soothed about what was not done right is doing them a disservice.
But I never said anything about coddling. Coddling is counter-productive of course. It spawns entitled dipshits, I agree......what does that have to do with red ink? You can critique someone's essay with any color in the rainbow/sharpie spectrum. The benefit of not using red, imo, is that it doesn't seem like every word you're saying is a death threat to the students' loved ones.CriticKitten said:I'm glad you have an opinion based purely on your own misguided ideals of what helps kids to learn better.
I can agree with this. Today we did a test on Operating Systems in College and most people failed, and there was red used (on the computer to show you the wrong answers) noone was demoralized or annoyed, just saying damn this was hard I gotta try better next timeKuroneko97 said:I KNEW my drawing would come in handy for a thread like this!
![]()
Oh Kyubey. For once you're the voice of reason.
About two weeks ago I got a math test back. 76. He marked the SHIT out of it, and I saw every single thing I got wrong. I felt bad, but fortunately I'd done all my work, so I went to tutoring so I can qualify for a retest this Friday. He tells us to mark each others homework in red ink too. I'm pretty sure he does it so we can see our mistakes. He makes us write in pencil so we can fix our mistakes.
Seriously, Education system. Grow some balls. These kids can take a bad grade. I saw I guy get a 51 and he didn't freak out. I'm not sure about his parents though...
And you're going about it wrong by assuming that the red ink is a power play. It's a commonly available color that stands out against blue ink, black ink, and pencil. It means "you got this wrong, and I'm showing you so you can learn from the mistake." As for what you were saying earlier about a 500 year old system that exists to humiliate students, it's nothing of the sort. Old fashioned teaching techniques have been around for a long time for a reason; they work. All this focus on teachers being "learning facilitators" who are supposed to be equal to the students, instead of authority figures who have special knowledge to be passed on? That is a sign of the decline of the educational system. It's one thing for a teacher to admit that he or she doesn't know everything. It's something else entirely for the teacher to know nothing, or to know no more than the students do. There's a word for teachers like that: it's unqualified. As in "if you don't know this stuff, you are unqualified to teach this subject."GrizzlerBorno said:SillyBear said:If these kids are crying over red ink, they're very likely going to turn out to be worthless man-children. You coddle something and it expects to be coddled. You can't get anywhere in life like that, unless you're incredibly lucky.PhoenixFlame said:What I really just disagree with you on is the degree to which you don't think this is a big deal or is not overboard. As someone who had to teach a few semesters of basic composition courses in college for his degree, I know that you're obligated to teach your students right from wrong in order to give them a baseline of correct writing behaviors and styles that help them survive more complex paper assignments. Using color as a means to coddle students into being soothed about what was not done right is doing them a disservice.But I never said anything about coddling. Coddling is counter-productive of course. It spawns entitled dipshits, I agree......what does that have to do with red ink? You can critique someone's essay with any color in the rainbow/sharpie spectrum. The benefit of not using red, imo, is that it doesn't seem like every word you're saying is a death threat to the students' loved ones.CriticKitten said:I'm glad you have an opinion based purely on your own misguided ideals of what helps kids to learn better.
Look, I'm for this because as a good, but rebellious student, I know I've waved off red-marked criticism tons of times, because I thought of it as "Mr.Senile's bullshit technicalities that I don't want to pay attention to". Was it right to do that? Absolutely not. Am I the only one who does do that? NO fucking Way! Students like me take constructive criticism MUCH better, when the teacher isn't hiding behind a color-coded veneer of arbitrary power and feelings of supremacy. I take constructive criticism from teachers who tell me, through their markings: "I am not on a higher level of existence, that you cannot hope to grasp with your inferior mind. I am, rather, a human being, just like you. However I am Waaay more experienced than you are on this subject; so let me tell you where and how you are wrong, so you can get better at it."
Call me naive for looking at this from the perspective of the group of people it's supposed to help. I have no other perspective. If that makes me some kind of ignorant ass to you.....well then you're probably one of the educators who are, imo, part of the problem. I mean no disrespect; but I always hated teachers like you, with your sense of superiority and egotism over students. I would mock you from the back of the class on the few days I would show up, and then prevent you from failing me by getting a 97% on the term exam (without cheating) JUST to spite you. I literally did just that with a few of my old teachers, I can do it with you.