And I'd join you.Wizzie said:If I could, I'd buy CoH/CoV and grind up a hero just to be this chaps sidekick.
Douchebagery breeds my foot up their ass!traceur_ said:And I'd join you.
I feel really sorry for the douchebags actually, getting angry like that and being prepared to take suck extreme measures over a fucking game. I weep for humanity.
Anonymity breeds douchebagery.
How is it that I was thinking that the whole way through, and then I get to the end to find this?Malygris said:The only thing we know for sure is this: Myers may be a scientist but most of us had this figured out a long time ago.
The truth is that these alternate worlds mirror our society, because the people in them are our society. They have been influenced by our world so they interact the same way, even in the virtual world, where you're meant to act differently. The result being that those who act in the way they're meant to in this virtual world get thought of as weird and annoying, and become singled out as a result.Malygris said:He said that while most gamers are adults, his time in City of Heroes was like a "bad high school experience" in which rules matter little when they come up against a "deeply-rooted culture."
That is mostly just speculation. How do you know that he wouldn't listen to "polite players?" The article doesn't talk about that. He didn't play to make other people angry; he played to take on the role of a superhero and fight crime. If I play a game using superior tactics, skill, and abilities and am able to defeat other players, am I in the wrong? No, I am better than them, and they are worse than me. The other players should look to him as someone to aspire to be, not someone to give death threats to.saregos said:On some level, yes, the people were jerks to treat him like that.
On the other hand... he built a character very explicitly around griefing people, and did so in a very nasty way. I haven't really played CoH, but from my experience in WoW, I can tell you I'd rather be killed in-zone than be somehow teleported to a different zone. Yes, he was using game mechanics, but at the same time it seems as though he would move into high-value zones, park there, and lock the other faction out.
Also, I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of the players asked him politely to stop, and were ignored. He was playing the game pretty explicitly to piss people off, and while the level of response he received was inappropriate, he shouldn't really have been surprised that he'd be treated as a dick when he was acting like one.
Finally, his actions probably had direct, negative repurcussions on his own side, as well... again, using WoW PvP realms as a baseline, a lot of people who get ganked by a high-level character will respond by hunting down one or several lower-level characters of that faction and ganking them in turn.
Were the people online dicks? Yes. Did he perhaps go out of his way to draw their ire? Definitely.
Holy crap I read that whole thing @_@ 26 pages~Malygris said:Fortunately, nobody ever succeeded in tracking down Myers or his family and in 2008 he revealed his identity in a paper entitled "Play and Punishment: The Sad and Curious Case of Twixt [http://www.masscomm.loyno.edu/~dmyers/F99%20classes/Myers_PlayPunishment_031508.doc]."