Science Invents a Way to Power Cars With Your Pee

Nocta-Aeterna

New member
Aug 3, 2009
709
0
0
Tulks said:
This leads me to ask, how does the power output of an H-cell compare to the electricity required to fill it?
Kwil said:
So.. the car has to break down the urea into it's components. Then uses the hydrogen to power the car, and has enough left over to break down more urea?

Here's the fun part.. hydrogen motors typically output water. We're getting dangerously close to a perpetual motion machine ala the Matrix.
Most likely, one processes the urine before goind right into the tank. Sorta like distilling ureum from raw sewage (or some service that collects urine?) and sending it to a processing plant and selling the hydrogen at gas stations, if we can find something the bloody stuff doesn't escape from.
 

Tulks

New member
Dec 30, 2010
317
0
0
ssManae said:
Tulks said:
This leads me to ask, how does the power output of an H-cell compare to the electricity required to fill it?
Ah, but you're looking at it the wrong way. You won't run hydrogen through a fuel cell to produce electricity to harvest hydrogen from the urine. Even if it was somehow net effective in production, you wouldn't have a lot left over for running the motors. Or the through-put would exhaust both your tanks real quick, either or.

But, say you do what a lot of hybrids already do: run the motors as generators to supply braking force. Instead of charging a battery, get some hydrogen from the storage tank.

I do wonder how many miles could be added per fill-up with such a method. That, and what exactly you would do with all the ammonia and other contaminates in the urine.

EDIT: Also, while it is true that the power density of hydrogen is laughably low compared to gasoline (as is just about any power density...) there is research under way on methods to vastly increase storage capacity of hydrogen without using high-pressure tanks.
I actually wasn't thinking of using the power from the cell to produce more fuel. My question was more, wouldn't it be more efficient to not produce the hydrogen, and just run the car electrically?

I had forgotten about recouping energy through regenerative braking, though.
 

gigastar

Insert one-liner here.
Sep 13, 2010
4,419
0
0
Well, that kinda takes the piss.

...Sorry.

Anyway it has good potential.

If only we could do something about the turds.
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
I...hmmm...

I'm not sure what to say here. It's clever, it re-uses human waste, and we probably won't have to smell it because of everything being self-contained.

However, my mind can't get over how this seems a bad idea on the grounds that it's YOUR PISS. The grease car, I understand. Peeing to make it go? I dunno...
 

Eleuthera

Let slip the Guinea Pigs of war!
Sep 11, 2008
1,673
0
0
XxRyanxX said:
Well, at almost every gas station it is about $3.85 so.. about 4 gallons which lasts about 2-3 days before needing to refill the car. I don't own it, but I sure do hate it when spending so much cash at these places.
McCa said:
I'm pretty sure the US has really cheap petrol prices... The UK is stupidly high, someone who drives will tell you ho much a litre.

(based on the ramblings of my Geography Teacher anyway)
A quick calculation gives a petrol price of US$9.21 a gallon here in the Netherlands at the moment. 1.70Euros a litre if someone want to check.

OT: "free" energy here we come, I'm pretty sure urea isn't about to run out any time soon.
 

Femaref

New member
May 4, 2008
186
0
0
XxRyanxX said:
Femaref said:
XxRyanxX said:
..That is very smart indeed. Pee is usually wasted in toilets for obvious reasons, our bodies needing to release it because it is liquid waste pretty much. Now our pee can have of use for cars (lol the way I am talking sounds weird, doesn't it?)

Besides that.. I really admire whoever came up with this idea to begin with. Also I got a laugh from the electrode thing mentioned that it's not the Pokemon haha. Thanks for the Thread, it's very cool to see we're getting somewhere. Now we can stop spending $78 a week or more on Gas (well, in America it is very expensive).
How much do you get for $78?
Well, at almost every gas station it is about $3.85 so.. about 4 gallons which lasts about 2-3 days before needing to refill the car. I don't own it, but I sure do hate it when spending so much cash at these places.
That doesn't make much sense, what is $3.85? A gallon? Anyway, as a comparision, the tank of my car has 60 litres, that's about 15 gallons, we pay 1.55?/l atm, so that's 93? = $130 resulting in $8.66 per gallon.
 

Grahav

New member
Mar 13, 2009
1,129
0
0
gigastar said:
Well, that kinda takes the piss.

...Sorry.

Anyway it has good potential.

If only we could do something about the turds.
Well, sewer shit after passing through sewage station treatent can be used as manure (although, people prefer cow crap for some reason...) also it can produce methane.

Nowadays, almost only the science news are capable of producing hope in me. Keep them coming.
 

Verlander

New member
Apr 22, 2010
2,449
0
0
Considering he different shit that we eat and drink, I'm pretty sure pee is too inconsistent for this to be realistic. That, and the sheer quantity needed is far more than we produce... unless someone can prove me wrong with reliable statistics?
 

Quazimofo

New member
Aug 30, 2010
1,370
0
0
Realitycrash said:
Too bad hydrogen is rather shit when it comes to powering engines, compared to..You know..Gasoline?
yeah but we dont have an efficient method of creating more raw petroleum, so make do with what you have ya know? and we make piss tons of..... well piss daily, so im sure quantity can make up for quality until tech develops to allow hydrogen to be closer to gas's efficiency.

i think a stalin quote fits here nicely (no im not a communist, my european history teacher is, so i hear this shit). but back to the quote
"quantity is a quality all its own"
 

Camaranth

New member
Feb 4, 2011
395
0
0
I've been saying for years that we need to re-route the sewer systems and throw in a few catalysts then boom methane power for the city! yet my council rep never listens to me....

In all seriousness though why the hell not? this theory makes about as much sense as some others I've heard.
reduce, reuse, recycle!
 

Quazimofo

New member
Aug 30, 2010
1,370
0
0
believer258 said:
I've got a different question:

First off is, how will men fill this sucker up on those cold snowy frozen winter mornings?

Second, how are women going to fill this thing up in the first place? It's kind of a sexist car, isn't it?

Third, won't the exhaust smell? I don't want to ride around in a place that smells strongly of piss.

Fourth, what if you get a boner while your tallywhacker is in the pissing hole? Generally, that won't happen, but what if it becomes a common joke amongst women to find a fellow who's filling up and does something in front of him to get him hard?
well, im sure the intake can be adjusted for these factors. and also, is the smell of burning gas that much better? not to mention the piss isnt directly used in the process, just its hydrogen, so im sure cars equipped for this would have a used piss collection tank, in addition to the gas tank. and ya just gotta dump it in a sewer or some shit when it fills
 

ssManae

New member
Aug 13, 2009
42
0
0
Tulks said:
ssManae said:
I actually wasn't thinking of using the power from the cell to produce more fuel. My question was more, wouldn't it be more efficient to not produce the hydrogen, and just run the car electrically?

I had forgotten about recouping energy through regenerative braking, though.
The problem with straight electricity is, well, batteries are heavy. That's why fuel cells were so widely heralded. You can run an electric engine, and the fuel cell and hydrogen storage are lighter.

Also, filling up a hydrogen tank is much faster than charging a battery. The dirty little secret of electric at the moment is that you need to charge them for about an hour for each hour of driving. There are some systems planned for faster charging, but the chances of those being deemed safe enough to be curb-side chargers is pretty slim.
 

thiosk

New member
Sep 18, 2008
5,410
0
0
Importantly, the catalysts are converting the urea. Theres urea in your pee, but not enough to drive very far.
 

Shirokurou

New member
Mar 8, 2010
1,039
0
0
Just stick a catheter in and roll on.
The military could have pee-powered tanks and helicopters.
 

Crazy_Man_42

New member
Mar 10, 2011
90
0
0
Sounds like a smart idea and we will actually have a useful purpose for urine now.

Now let's actually get this idea into reality instead of talking about it and then never getting it outside of the lab and keeping the United States under the thumb of the gas and oil company for another generation.