Yep, but this development could prove extra-useful for those who refuse to leave their PC...ReturnPostage said:Is this site about video games?
Bwahahahahah!Racecarlock said:I think it's safe to say that whoever came up with this is a real whiz.
Ba dump tish.
Quite a lot. Beer will increase the H2O volume of your urine however it is urea (the yellow bit) that is generating the power. This is created from breaking down amino acids found in proteins. Bottom line: drinking beer doesn't help, you need to eat a steak dinner.008Zulu said:Writing our names in the snow or making lemon snow cones for our friends will no longer be time honoured traditions. I wonder how much beer you will need to drink to fill your tank?
Didn't top gear also test if a car could run on turds? from what I remember the turd-mobile was only slightly less effective, then the gasoline fuelled car.Grahav said:Well, sewer shit after passing through sewage station treatent can be used as manure (although, people prefer cow crap for some reason...) also it can produce methane.gigastar said:Well, that kinda takes the piss.
...Sorry.
Anyway it has good potential.
If only we could do something about the turds.
Nowadays, almost only the science news are capable of producing hope in me. Keep them coming.
Not just video games, its mainly videogames with general pop culture added on like movies and stuff.ReturnPostage said:Is this site about video games?
Yeah, piss might be free, but electrolysis sure isn't. It still takes a huge amount of effort to make hydrogen out of pee, and even if the raw component is "free" (like water, for instance. I'm guessing it's more effective to make hydrogen out of piss than water. Did you know that the first car-engine was based on hydrogen distilled from water? No? Well that's because the major petrol-corporations bought up the patents and then shut down the research and production), it's still isn't free to produce, nor is it very effective. One of the main reasons petrol > water or electricity is that is is simply more "bang for the buck".Quazimofo said:yeah but we dont have an efficient method of creating more raw petroleum, so make do with what you have ya know? and we make piss tons of..... well piss daily, so im sure quantity can make up for quality until tech develops to allow hydrogen to be closer to gas's efficiency.Realitycrash said:Too bad hydrogen is rather shit when it comes to powering engines, compared to..You know..Gasoline?
i think a stalin quote fits here nicely (no im not a communist, my european history teacher is, so i hear this shit). but back to the quote
"quantity is a quality all its own"
it's for gamers to come together, and a good amount is about video games, but we talk about other things. games are interesting, but it's not the only thing interesting or important in this world. games is just a connection of all of us. what we talk about is up to us.ReturnPostage said:Is this site about video games?
Oh, boo! Bad pun/joke. >Racecarlock said:I think it's safe to say that whoever came up with this is a real whiz.
Ba dump tish.
In theory, yes. In practice, we like anything involving nerd culture and science (and on occaision, current events).ReturnPostage said:Is this site about video games?
You summed up what I wanted to add, for the most part. It's nice to see that people aren't defending oil. Whenever I talk about how we have already reached "peak oil", people just say, "Oh... but we have alternative sources when it goes away."Realitycrash said:Yeah, piss might be free, but electrolysis sure isn't. It still takes a huge amount of effort to make hydrogen out of pee, and even if the raw component is "free" (like water, for instance. I'm guessing it's more effective to make hydrogen out of piss than water. Did you know that the first car-engine was based on hydrogen distilled from water? No? Well that's because the major petrol-corporations bought up the patents and then shut down the research and production), it's still isn't free to produce, nor is it very effective. One of the main reasons petrol > water or electricity is that is is simply more "bang for the buck".Quazimofo said:yeah but we dont have an efficient method of creating more raw petroleum, so make do with what you have ya know? and we make piss tons of..... well piss daily, so im sure quantity can make up for quality until tech develops to allow hydrogen to be closer to gas's efficiency.Realitycrash said:Too bad hydrogen is rather shit when it comes to powering engines, compared to..You know..Gasoline?
i think a stalin quote fits here nicely (no im not a communist, my european history teacher is, so i hear this shit). but back to the quote
"quantity is a quality all its own"
More of petrol's effectiveness goes towards actually driving the engine, instead of being just "wasted energy" in form of excess energy like heat and sound. And oh, even tho electric cars in some cases are more effective, it takes a shitload bigger storage-capacity in the form of a battery than it takes for the same amount of efficiency when it comes to a fuel-tank.
True, this will probably change, if we ever put some research-money into more effective batteries, or tanks that can hold hydrogen, so all and all I'm glad they are researching it.
Just don't think that it will be any major change soon. Not before the oil runs out.