With the added bonus of potentially condemning yourself to a prison sentence.Montezuma said:Or, you could just point a regular gun at them, get the same result, if they aren't stupid.
As someone who works with sound every day, I really don't see this being effective. Focused directional microphones are old hat, and lots of people already experience exactly this kind of delay when speaking into mics connected to sound systems.Mike Kayatta said:Scientists Create Gun That Physically Stops You From Talking
I've seen something similar done in person a decade ago, except they had headphones and it played back the voice I think 600ms later. The idea is that the person becomes fixated on the speech being played back rather than their own. Out of a dozen people that used it not a single one could speak a normal sentence coherently.Proverbial Jon said:I see what you did there.Mike Kayatta said:According to the team who put this 1984 2012 wonder together...
OT: I'm not even sure I understand how this works... so it just echoes the voice of the speaker? Does that stop them speaking simply because they can't comprehend their own words then? That would mean the actual stopping part would be entirely voluntary on the speaker's part.
Still quicker to just shoot them.
[sub][sub](I don't support the act of shooting people.)[/sub][/sub]
The fact that they won't know you'll be using this in advance. That's about it really.dessertmonkeyjk said:So it's simply the equivalent of turning on Playback on your headset microphone so you'll hear what it hears a second afterward... what?
So what stops them from using earplugs?
oh, they've had those, this one's just quieter and makes less of a bloody mess...unacomn said:They actually made a gun that can kill freedom of speech. I see no way this can be missused in the wrong hands. Nope, nothing comes to mind, not a single thing.
And then we segue to:Slycne said:Cool expierment. As someone that's accidentally been on the receiving end of this effect (we were testing a streaming set up, but you ended up hearing yourself on a delay) it's incredibly jarring and very hard to keep a train of though going.
Though a few of the doom and gloomers here are failing to account for the fact that you need to be able to hear this device.
antipunt said:Couldn't you just wear a set of earplugs?
Amazing how mundane devices can defeat thousands or even millions of dollars worth of research and work. I wouldn't be surprised if we see sub-standard versions like these being sold on QVC after the government grows frustrated with it.Innegativeion said:Or... fuck it, just shove your fingers in your ears xD.
SurfinTaxt said:I have a gun that can do that. Its called a shotgun
Samurai Silhouette said:A normal gun can stop you from physically talking too.
Montezuma said:Or, you could just point a regular gun at them, get the same result, if they aren't stupid.
TrilbyWill said:Any of them think "why not just point a bullet-shooting gun at someone and tell them to shut up?"
*golf clap*gyroscopeboy said:Im pretty sure a regular gun stops you from talking too.
This is.... wonderful.217not237 said:Japan: allowing silent protest since 2012.
soTanksie said:that wasnt funny then and it aint now.Zen Toombs said:[portal reference]s_h_a_d_o said:For science.
You monster!
You can experience the exact thing this device replicates on any VOIP program, like Ventrillo or Teamspeak. If the person you are speaking to has voice activation on, and their outbound coming through standard speakers, as opposed to a headset, when you speak to them, your voice will activate their mic and send your voice back to you on a slight delay. As someone who uses these programs for a lot of things, I can assure you that it is nearly -impossible- to speak over yourself like that, you end up tripping over your own words and are rendered unable to complete even simple sentences.Voltano said:OT: I'm not even sure I understand how this works... so it just echoes the voice of the speaker? Does that stop them speaking simply because they can't comprehend their own words then? That would mean the actual stopping part would be entirely voluntary on the speaker's part.