Scientists Developing Tornado Power Plant

PunkRex

New member
Feb 19, 2010
2,533
0
0
doggie015 said:
PunkRex said:
Next I shall harness the raw energy of tidal waves and lightning storms and then I will construct a drill that will bore into the earths mantle releasing the molten hot power within! Hahahahaha!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Uhh... we already have wave energy power plants and geothermal energy has been around since before I was born (First geothermal electricity generator was operational in 1960)!

Lightining... not yet but they're working on it... Seeing as we can do stuff with it already we can't be far off using it for energy...
Im training to be a geologist/palaeontologist so I do know about tidal/geothermal energy... I just don't think we're using them EVILLY enough!

I did not know about them Tesla Turrets though, I want those at my front door!!!
 

freebiewitz

New member
Nov 22, 2008
492
0
0
Sounds like a load of hot air.
They're just taking us for a spin.
The big twist is that it won't work.
This will blow over eventually.
This news is just static.

Okay I'm done now but seriously this is pretty electric!
 

halfeclipse

New member
Nov 8, 2008
373
0
0
JellySlimerMan said:
That sounds like a perpetual motion machine, to the point that its bound to fail.

How is it that the energy consumed by making a TORNADO is lower than the energy we receive from it?
JellySlimerMan said:
That sounds like a perpetual motion machine, to the point that its bound to fail.

How is it that the energy consumed by making a TORNADO is lower than the energy we receive from it?


Because it doesn't make a tornado in the sense there's some big spinney thing moving lots of air. Instead it uses big spinney things to move hot, humid air into a giant cylinder where physics takes over. The energy to power the vortex should come from the heat energy stored in atmospheric water vapor and there's an awful lot of that, something like 10^21J a day every day.




Scrumpmonkey said:
Basic thermodynamics would seems to suggest this wouldn't be as effective as it would seem. Generally the higher the temperature a heat-engine (and this is a heat engine) operates the more efficient it is because the 'flow' of heat is bigger from hot to cold. For example a steam engine is less efficient than a combustion engine and so on. The temperature differential here will be in the 10s of degrees, so I'm not sure how the energy equations work. Air is also crappy compared to water or high pressure steam for transmitting energy.

Maybe it's because of the self sustaining process i don't know but I'm not sure how they can claim these pretty miraculous numbers.

That'll be under conditions conducive to operation, but tropical areas and anywhere it gets nice and humid for decent stretches of time should get a good bit of power out of them. The "Halfeclipse to to lazy to hunt down and check the math" version of how it works is above but the shorter version is pretty much "The Sun".

Well, assuming its basically a giant vortex engine anyways.


Also 200 megawatts isn't very high. It's about comparable to 1, maybe 2 hydroelectric generators, except a hydro dam will have more then a dozen of them whereas this is just the one. Not sure about the cost, but I expect that'll be operating cost not lifetime cost.
 

uchytjes

New member
Mar 19, 2011
969
0
0
All I can think about is "How does one weaponize this technology? and if one can, can we make a fire tornado?"
 

theultimateend

New member
Nov 1, 2007
3,621
0
0
Bobic said:
JellySlimerMan said:
That sounds like a perpetual motion machine, to the point that its bound to fail.

How is it that the energy consumed by making a TORNADO is lower than the energy we receive from it?
They plan to use the excess heat energy from nuclear power plants if I remember correctly (and presumably that's why the
picture has a tornado coming out of a cooling tower).

THAT'S RIGHT FOLKS, ALL THE SAFETY OF A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT COMBINED WITH THE SAFETY OF A TORNADO, WHAT COULD GO WRONG?

Nah, I'm kidding, Nuclear power plants aren't nearly as dangerous as people make them out to be. Still, a tornado's a tornado.
They also COULD be tremendously safe, its just most of the ones people ***** about are as old or older than me.
 

Berithil

Maintenence Man of the Universe
Mar 19, 2009
1,600
0
0
Steve the Pocket said:
Tornado Power! It's not just for funneling reservoir water to Cloudsdale anymore.
I came into this thread hoping someone would make a reference, and you delivered. Thank you.

Anyways, I don't really see how this will produce more energy than it will cost, but I guess we'll see.

Also, just because I can :D

 

IRBaboon

New member
Aug 29, 2009
33
0
0
JellySlimerMan said:
That sounds like a perpetual motion machine, to the point that its bound to fail.

How is it that the energy consumed by making a TORNADO is lower than the energy we receive from it?
Because it's not a closed system, the energy isn't being put into sustaining the tornado like one would with a big fan. But to creating a condition where a tornado can form, you can get a lot more energy out of a tornado than it takes to make one. It's a case of moving all the energy into one place so that it can be harnessed. Think of it this way. Say you have a fire on a stick, moving the stick doesn't take a lot of energy, but the energy of the fire is now in a different place. Same principle but with air, move the air so that it is in conditions that will allow for the harvesting of the energy. Tornadoes are already self sustaining to a degree so why not make them. If this explanation is bad or confuses you then I'm sorry, forgive me for not making it clearer I'm drunk
 

chadachada123

New member
Jan 17, 2011
2,310
0
0
IRBaboon said:
JellySlimerMan said:
That sounds like a perpetual motion machine, to the point that its bound to fail.

How is it that the energy consumed by making a TORNADO is lower than the energy we receive from it?
Because it's not a closed system, the energy isn't being put into sustaining the tornado like one would with a big fan. But to creating a condition where a tornado can form, you can get a lot more energy out of a tornado than it takes to make one. It's a case of moving all the energy into one place so that it can be harnessed. Think of it this way. Say you have a fire on a stick, moving the stick doesn't take a lot of energy, but the energy of the fire is now in a different place. Same principle but with air, move the air so that it is in conditions that will allow for the harvesting of the energy. Tornadoes are already self sustaining to a degree so why not make them. If this explanation is bad or confuses you then I'm sorry, forgive me for not making it clearer I'm drunk
Your username/avatar is surprisingly and humorously fitting with your admission that you're drunk.

OT: I, for one, welcome our new cyclone overlords.

But for real, it's about time we took wind turbines (which harness the energy made by heating differences in the atmosphere) and found a way to bring it to such a small level. This is freaking awesome.
 

Atmos Duality

New member
Mar 3, 2010
8,473
0
0
How does he plan on getting two very different airmasses to mix in such a tiny area?
How is going to CREATE such airmasses with the properties he wants right at the surface?
Airmasses kind of don't like to change quickly, that's why they flow around each other first, rather than mixing immediately.

I'd love to see the prototype though.
 

gigastar

Insert one-liner here.
Sep 13, 2010
4,419
0
0
uchytjes said:
All I can think about is "How does one weaponize this technology? and if one can, can we make a fire tornado?"
I would think simply letting off alot of methane into it would turn it into what youre looking for. Briefly.

Alternatively, if wheat flour or another organic dust doesnt simply get tossed out of the vortex, you could have an exploding tornado.
 

Not G. Ivingname

New member
Nov 18, 2009
6,368
0
0
This sounds like some plot of a B-movie mad scientists to take over the world or con the world out of a tiny amount of money then what the technology could be used for legally.
 

TheMyffic

New member
May 3, 2011
26
0
0
I know very little, but how does one keep said tornado from straying to surrounding areas? (Did someone mention a nuclear plant nearby?)
 

Baldr

The Noble
Jan 6, 2010
1,739
0
0
What on earth makes them think that once they get this tornado started, it is going to stay in the same place?
 

madster11

New member
Aug 17, 2010
476
0
0
Can we somehow combine this with a nuclear power plant? Then we'll scale it up, get those laser things they use to force lightning to be created, and mount it all on top of a skull shaped mountain.
We shall beam pictures of this mountain, with details of what it does, into space. This shall serve as a warning to any other alien race that fucking with us is a bad move, and a 1km wide nuclear fire tornado filled with lightning shall serve as the punctuation mark.

All that to make my cappuccino.