It cost 3 cents, but when they add on the profit from the company that will own it and doubt it will be that much cheaper than what we pay now.
Worst case scenario, you have a loose tornado. I mean, sure, it's bad, but compared to the kind of disaster you get from a nuclear meltdown or an oil spill, it's relatively minor.weirdguy said:I'm not sure if something like this is exactly safe, per se...
Now say it in a French ascent, it sounds evil that way This is why I love Canada (along side LRR, ice hockey and maple syrup.)Notsomuch said:Yes... Yess... YEEESSSSSS! I am so hot for this, no joke.
Boss."The power of a tornado is undisputed,"
French? Try Belgian. I'd like to see the energies try to oppose this.Evil Smurf said:Now say it in a French ascent, it sounds evil that way This is why I love Canada (along side LRR, ice hockey and maple syrup.)
You forgot about extracting gasoline from air [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/120241-British-Scientists-Make-Gasoline-From-Air]! I think these two companies should fuse and call their product Tornado Fuel and use "Ride the whirlwind!" as a slogan.Magichead said:What other field of human endeavour even comes close to science? Particle accelerators smashing atoms at fractions below the speed of light that cross national borders. Creating and harnessing artificial suns. Generating electricity by capturing tornadoes. SCIENCE! >
Sounds as much a perpetual motion machine as solar power, i.e. not at all, but powered by the sun.JellySlimerMan said:That sounds like a perpetual motion machine, to the point that its bound to fail.
How is it that the energy consumed by making a TORNADO is lower than the energy we receive from it?
Don't be such a blowhard.freebiewitz said:Sounds like a load of hot air.
They're just taking us for a spin.
The big twist is that it won't work.
This will blow over eventually.
This news is just static.
Okay I'm done now but seriously this is pretty electric!
He probably is referring to the fact that winds are caused by differences in pressure, which is related to temperature, which is obviously governed by the sun.rhizhim said:and in 2 weeks we will enjoy another cheesy "what would happen?: tornado apocalypse!" """""documentary""""" on the syfy channel...
wait, what?Jowe said:Sounds as much a perpetual motion machine as solar power, i.e. not at all, but powered by the sun.JellySlimerMan said:That sounds like a perpetual motion machine, to the point that its bound to fail.
How is it that the energy consumed by making a TORNADO is lower than the energy we receive from it?
(the sun drives the wind and waves)
please specify and add some sources
since i dont think the sun affects the wind that much.
http://www.windows2universe.org/sun/sunspots_and_wind.htmlOne example was a study to see if the solar cycle affected wind patterns on Earth. In 1949, H.C. Willett looked to see if the solar cycle affected long-term changes of wind patterns. He saw the solar cycle as a definite factor in influencing wind variations. He did admit that, "the physical basis of any such relationship must be utterly complex, and is as yet not at all understood." However, attempts to confirm his conclusions were not successful.
In fact, over time and with more and more studies and better instruments (especially satellites outside the Earth's atmosphere), connections between the solar cycle and Earth's weather have been found more and more unlikely.
One exception to this seems to be that solar cosmic rays do affect Earth's cloudiness.
This comes down to how much energy does it take to make a tornado vs how much energy does a tornado give off. Tornado's are made from contrasting sets of temperatures for the most part so how much energy does a tornado give off compared to heating and cooling the designated areas. It is a interesting question but obviously there must be something to it or else the government would not have invested all this money.JellySlimerMan said:That sounds like a perpetual motion machine, to the point that its bound to fail.
How is it that the energy consumed by making a TORNADO is lower than the energy we receive from it?
I can't believe he hasn't been kicked for incompetence to be honest.aegix drakan said:Sweet! Not only is this really cool and potentially a breakthrough in green energy, but Canada, my own country is making this!
Wait...Canada is making this... Harper hates the environment, is doing tons of stuff to screw over green alternatives and protected wildlife and...
.....Bah. Watch this get defunded next week for "Not showing any progress" while his big oil buddies pat themselves on the back for another successful interruption of progress.
>_< I hate that guy...
If the tornado somehow got out of hand it would just dissipate when leaving the area unless outside had the exact conditions to support a tornado in which case we would have had one already anyways.Yokillernick said:What could possibly go wrong...
Seems cool enough if they can keep everything under controller. I'd hate to see Canada engulfed by tornadoes.