Jegsimmons said:
which proves dinosaurs could record history....WE HAVE TO DIG DEEPER IN THE GROUND FOR THE LOST DINO SCROLLS!!!
Where do I sign up?
Major Tom said:
Zachary Amaranth said:
Three minutes later, creationists rally to deny its existence.
They probably wont deny its existence, but they would probably use the excellent condition the skeleton is in to 'prove' that the world isn't as old as all that, and somehow tie Noah's flood into the mix.
It's funny. This post is split between response taking the other side (embracing it), and people trying to use my joke about creationism as a wholesale condemnation of religion. I much prefer this kind.
Mine was based on a recurring notion from the creationist camps that we're assembling the fossils wrong. I'm not sure I would call this the main view, but it's the one I find most humourous. Not that it's never happened, but the idea that we've screwed up the fossil record wholesale because we're "doing it wrong" is kind of funny, and leads to the sort of "what dinosaurs" claims that would be screwed up by this. Therefore facilitating denial or gross backpedaling.
Anyway, historically, creationists have done both, sometimes with different factions of the overall whole going "it proves our point" and "lalalala, I'm not listening!"
I do stick by my wisecrack, but I wouldn't be shocked if they did this either. And bonus points for working the flood in. Raptors can't swim, it seems.
Anyway, don't take the explanation as aimed at you. I've got an inbox full of "OMG UR STOOPID LOL," so I figured I'd just explain myself.