Scott Pilgrim hasn't opened in the UK yet, but I'd imagine it'll do well seeing as it's directed by Edgar Wright, who wrote and directed Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz. And those two are British classics.
You know, that is a fair point. Could also do with a little Shah Rukh Khan, although pretty much no one in the western hemisphere has heard of him.tellmeimaninja said:The lack of Samuel Jackson automatically renders the main selling point of The Expendables invalid.Yokai said:Noooooooooo!
I stand by my belief that Scott Pilgrim was the second best film this year after Inception, but honestly I'm not surprised. A movie full of retro video game references based off a small-time graphic novel doesn't really stand a chance against a movie with every action star ever in it, regardless of how awesome the former is and how terrible the latter.
I don't care though, I mark it as another success in Edgar Wright's perfect record. It was so great.
Cera's performance is much better than usual in this case. He's still not exactly right for the spastic and naive role, but he does better than I expected him to. Even if you hate the guy on principle, the very well-written secondary characters make up for him.dathwampeer said:I hate that guy too. I think practically every film he's been in has suffered for it... Well in my opinion.Furburt said:I would see Scott Pilgrim, but Michael Cera's faux awkwardness prevents me from doing so. However, I'm looking forward to the Expendables. Dumb, yes, but fun.
Anyway, I'd say it'll make it back in DVD sales. Those films popular with the indie crowd usually do.
Actually, The Expendables had a budget of 40 milion while Scott Pilgrim had a budget of 60 milion.Axolotl said:What the large budget action film staring some of the most well known actors today outperformed a film aimed purely at uber-hardcore video game/comic/manga/anime nerds? Who could have possibly guessed?
I plan to see both on the opening day, The Expendables didn't dissapoint and I doubt Scott Pilgrim will either.
That's so offensive. To monkeys. Even drugged they have better decision-making skills than average film-goers.tellmeimaninja said:Plus, as I've said: People are drugged monkeys who are easily entertained by random flashing coloured lights. That's the main reason The Expendables has made money at all.
But 40 million is still a big budget, meaning that The Expendables is a big budget film. The budget for Scott Pilgrim may be bigger but the target audience is, small, really small.IamQ said:Actually, The Expendables had a budget of 40 milion while Scott Pilgrim had a budget of 60 milion.Axolotl said:What the large budget action film staring some of the most well known actors today outperformed a film aimed purely at uber-hardcore video game/comic/manga/anime nerds? Who could have possibly guessed?
I plan to see both on the opening day, The Expendables didn't dissapoint and I doubt Scott Pilgrim will either.
What? That happened all the way back in volume 5.no oneder said:I just finished reading Scott's Vol. 6 and I really have to say this:
Stephen Stills is gay!
As for the OT, I don't plan on seeing The Expendables until they apologize.
Whoa. That didn't make you sound like an egocentric jackass at all.tellmeimaninja said:The lack of Samuel Jackson automatically renders the main selling point of The Expendables invalid.Yokai said:Noooooooooo!
I stand by my belief that Scott Pilgrim was the second best film this year after Inception, but honestly I'm not surprised. A movie full of retro video game references based off a small-time graphic novel doesn't really stand a chance against a movie with every action star ever in it, regardless of how awesome the former is and how terrible the latter.
I don't care though, I mark it as another success in Edgar Wright's perfect record. It was so great.
I think we should all go see Scott Pilgrim. Right now.
Plus, as I've said: People are drugged monkeys who are easily entertained by random flashing coloured lights. That's the main reason The Expendables has made money at all.
I really don't remember that.crimson5pheonix said:What? That happened all the way back in volume 3.no oneder said:I just finished reading Scott's Vol. 6 and I really have to say this:
Stephen Stills is gay!
As for the OT, I don't plan on seeing The Expendables until they apologize.
Well that's what he said. And looking back, I can now see moments where he's referred to like that.no oneder said:I really don't remember that.crimson5pheonix said:What? That happened all the way back in volume 5.no oneder said:I just finished reading Scott's Vol. 6 and I really have to say this:
Stephen Stills is gay!
As for the OT, I don't plan on seeing The Expendables until they apologize.
And it's directed by Edgar Wright, the director of Hot Fuzz and Shaun of the Dead. And is a homage to retro gaming and nerd culture in general.Eggsnham said:I honestly didn't see the appeal of either movie.
Whoo. An awkward kid played by Michael Cera (again) who meets a beautiful girl who's undoubtedly out of his proverbial league and somehow convinces her to be in a relationship with him by using his charmingly awkward social skills (again).
But the twist is that there's music and superpowers involved. And fighting.
If it isn't good, I plan to chase Edgar Wright around the garden with a bit of wood.SalamanderJoe said:Scott Pilgrim hasn't opened in the UK yet, but I'd imagine it'll do well seeing as it's directed by Edgar Wright, who wrote and directed Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz. And those two are British classics.