If only there was a section of this forum where ceaselessly cyclical arguments of a political nature could be carried out without derailing threads that have even the slightest relevance...The Human Torch said:Can you blame them? It's a topic that will always remain hot. If people feel the desire to talk about this, then we should we let them. Besides some obvious trolling and name-calling, there is no harm. The day we stop debating is the day humanity has given up.James Joseph Emerald said:![]()
I should have known this would immediately turn into a gun control / anti-USA flamewar...
Also, I'd hardly call the majority of these posts a "debate". Intellectually Dishonest Person #1 says "Dis iz y Merika is teh evulz!" and Intellectually Dishonest Person #2 says "No! If we dont haf gunz, who will shot all da terrorist?"
Besides, the issue of gun control is irrelevant in this post; the interesting part to debate is whether it was reasonable force. But even that's a very hard argument to sustain, because I don't think you can be expected to spend a lot of time exploring the philosophical ramifications of your actions when three masked gunman storm into your shop. That's a pretty solid 'shoot first, ask questions later' scenario.