Security Guard kicks ass and takes name.

Recommended Videos

Chives on top of me

New member
Jun 2, 2012
17
0
0
razer17 said:
Alexnader said:
It's always amazing how bad people are at aiming in combat situations. That guard just starts unloading at those guys yet only one of them is hit and is still able to crawl away. What's the acceptable accuracy for policemen in close quarter combat? 30%? I've heard that figure bandied about.

So it's a testament to both the fragility and determination of the human body as well as the negative effects of stress.
Research suggests that accuracy on a firing range and accuracy in real combat are basically unlinked. Basically it's down to the person, if they have the balls to shoot and potentially end a human life. And the guard could have just been laying down fire to make them leave, rather than actively trying to shoot the robbers.


I'm not sure we should celebrate a guy shooting someone else, seems kind of weird to me. Still the guard probably did the right thing.
This quote from Unforgiven seems to fit

Little Bill Daggett: "Look son, being a good shot, being quick with a pistol, that don't do no harm, but it don't mean much next to being cool-headed. A man who will keep his head and not get rattled under fire, like as not, he'll kill ya. It ain't so easy to shoot a man anyhow, especially if the son-of-a-***** is shootin' back at you."
 

The Human Torch

New member
Sep 12, 2010
750
0
0
Signa said:
The Human Torch said:
Signa said:
If it was anything like that other attempted internet cafe robbery, then this guy did the right thing, no question about it.

Seeing the video shows some guys being stopped before they could actually cause harm, which is admittedly a little off-putting. It's harder to 100% justify shooting someone when their only crime up to that point was acting rowdy with a strange sense of apparel. Do I have any doubt that they were up to no good? None at all.
Are you fucking kidding me? Please read your own post again and get back to me on how many things are wrong with that statement. In the meantime I will be busy banging my head against my desk.
Quite flaming me, human torch. I'm agreeing with the situation. Judging by your quoted post I read, you agree too. I just know the gun control advocates love to be whiners about some of these things. "oh dear, he hadn't opened fire on any innocents yet, so he didn't deserve life-threatening injuries!" I was showing them the ground they have to stand on with those statements, and how shallow it was. Could I possibly could have phrased something better? Maybe.
I completely misread your post, consider my first reply retracted. My apologies.
 

DoPo

"You're not cleared for that."
Jan 30, 2012
8,663
0
0
axlryder said:
I'm pretty sure there was no name-taking done by the security guard in this video. I'm disappointed by the misleading title.
Well, it was a time to kick ass and take some names...without taking the names.

Probably obscure video game reference for the win!
For the record, it's from Deer Avenger 4
 
Apr 2, 2010
43
0
0
He did his duty, if the police thought otherwise we'd here about him being charged. The fact that other people we're present at the cafe meant he was not just responsible for the store but other lives.
 

II2

New member
Mar 13, 2010
1,492
0
0
*looks at thread*

>__O

I think regardless of your feelings on the politics and cultures, we can at least agree that it's very bad thing when people get shot, but that violence in self defense is (often) justified and that being rushed by multiple hooded, armed men is sufficient justification to take action.
 

Goofguy

New member
Nov 25, 2010
3,862
0
0
Say what you will about the security guard but the suspects had it coming. They were rushing armed in to that building with the intent to rob the place. If you put yourself in such a position, you better be ready to face the potential consequences (imprisonment, death, injury).

It's easy to sit here and critique the security guard. Until you find yourself in that situation with three armed thugs coming towards you, you can't really speak against him. Often, such split second decisions could mean the difference between life and death.
 

axlryder

victim of VR
Jul 29, 2011
1,862
0
0
DoPo said:
axlryder said:
I'm pretty sure there was no name-taking done by the security guard in this video. I'm disappointed by the misleading title.
Well, it was a time to kick ass and take some names...without taking the names.

Probably obscure video game reference for the win!
For the record, it's from Deer Avenger 4
Yeah, I'd say that ranks about an 8.5 on my obscurometer.
 

Savryc

NAPs, Spooks and Poz. Oh my!
Aug 4, 2011
394
0
0
Good on him, I'd happily buy the guard a pint. Let those scumbags rot for all I care if you're going in armed it's obvious what your intention is, no sympathy for them whatsoever and a giant...


...to the people trying to bash the security guard for doing his job with zero casualties.
 

Nickolai77

New member
Apr 3, 2009
2,843
0
0
Not to belittle the security guard or anything, but he could have heard them running outside before they opened the door, warning him to their presence hence his startlingly quick reaction time.

Still- very impressive performance from the security guard. He saw armed figures running at him in ski masks. Obviously a very dangerous situation but he what was necessary.
 

Saladfork

New member
Jul 3, 2011
920
0
0
I'm going into security myself, and security guys aren't allowed to carry firearms in Alberta unless autherized by the soliciter general, and he generally only allows it for armoured van companys and bodyguards. I'm actually rather glad that I won't have an option for lethal force, since I'd rather not have the risk of somebody dying over a misjudgement on my part. Hopefully if and when I join the police, the training will be good enough to where I'll feel cmfortable with my own judgement in that regard, but I don't right now.

That said, I think this guy did the right thing, considering the high liklihood of criminals being armed in the states.
 

DoPo

"You're not cleared for that."
Jan 30, 2012
8,663
0
0
axlryder said:
DoPo said:
axlryder said:
I'm pretty sure there was no name-taking done by the security guard in this video. I'm disappointed by the misleading title.
Well, it was a time to kick ass and take some names...without taking the names.

Probably obscure video game reference for the win!
For the record, it's from Deer Avenger 4
Yeah, I'd say that ranks about an 8.5 on my obscurometer.
No worries, I didn't even remember that game until I saw your post. And I realised I haven't heard anybody mention it in...a very long tome. We're talking 8+ years here. You're excused.

But if you have the opportunity, do try DA4, say if they release it on GOG or something. It's incredibly fun game - a deer is hunting hunters. And he looks like this



Also, you get fart powers. And lots of hilarious quotes.
 

GundamSentinel

The leading man, who else?
Aug 23, 2009
4,445
0
0
I'm on the fence. Here in the Netherlands, because of the relatively small presence of organized crime and drug problems and yes (it's silly to deny it), because of gun control (well, maybe not gun control itself, but more the national attitude towards it), gun crimes are very rare. The reaction of this security guard would be unthinkable here, and not just because he'd probably be prosecuted into jail for shooting someone without a 100% clear cause. This situation just doesn't really happen here, and certainly not on a regular basis.

But I can certainly understand how these situations would exist in America and how the security guard's reaction would (and maybe should) be condoned. It's a matter of atmosphere and attitude, both of which are very different here than in the US. That's why I can't really blame the security guard for the way he reacted.

That said, I don't think he should be lauded for it either (I frankly find that abhorrent). He did what he thought was right, considering the circumstances. Whether it was the right thing, I don't know. It's not the way I'd reacted, but again, I can't blame the guy for doing what he did.
 

McMullen

New member
Mar 9, 2010
1,334
0
0
irmasterlol said:
You may be European and therefore unaware of this, but guns still work when you're laying down. For all that guard knew, the failed robber was about to turn around and start shooting back.
I love comments like this. I've seen more and bigger guns during visits to Europe than I have while growing up and living in the US.
 

GistoftheFist

New member
Jan 6, 2012
281
0
0
As expected. Gun thread = belittle/insult America for having them.

I propose we invent a new ___'s Law: anytime violence/shooting happens, someone will mention America in a negative way every time. Sort of like Godwin's Law.
 
Oct 10, 2011
4,488
0
0
The Human Torch said:
username sucks said:
What? Hes being complemented for this? In the video you can clearly see that they turn to run as soon as he pulls the gun, but he still keeps shooting them as they are running. He did react quickly, but he also definitly overreacted here. If they are already running, why whould he shoot them? I would complement him if he stopped shooting as soon as he noticed that they were running, but he keeps shooting even at the guy who is crawling out the door.
Captcha: Lets be serious now
Let me know how rational you are thinking when 3 armed men, with hoods covering their faces rush into your store/cafe/whatever and you are (literally) caught in the moment.
I had the pleasure of being dragged along at gunpoint in the morning when me and my co-workers were opening the supermarket I worked at at the time. I didn't have a gun to draw on them, but on the way (whilst being pushed forward by the muggers) from the kantina where I was putting on my workclothes to the office where the safe is located, I was activating every silent alarm I could get my hands on.

In hindsight it may have been a dumb thing to do, because if the muggers actually did their homework and knew where all the silent alarms were and how to activate them, they would have put a stop to me before I even got the chance. Maybe even with a bullet.

But those are snap-decisions you make in the heat of the moment.

You have the benefit of hindsight and even misplaced sympathy for the robbers. These guys took a chance by trying to rob a place, and actions have consequences. They got more than they could handle, I applaud the security guard for his swift and decisive action which probably saved lives and kept whatever customers were in the building at the time from a traumatic experience. I had to get fucking therapy to get over my ordeal, because having a gun pushed against the back of your skull is not something that you just shrug off.

This whole event took less than 5 seconds, you had the entire length of the video, plus maybe a few extra minutes to write a post about that. You can't compare these situations. You can't judge what the security guard should have done. It does not work that way.

Put some more thought into your replies before you shoot your mouth off.
If you finished reading my comment, you would have seen that I said his quick reaction was commendable, but I didn't like that he continued to shoot at a guy that was crawling on the ground after already being shot. Also, you just said that I spoke incorrectly because I had too much time to think about it, then told me to think more before posting. And I thought that the whole point of a comment section on a news article is for people to analyse the news. I said what he should have done, but I never said that he should be expected to do it, because I know its a stressful situation. I know, because I have had my former best friend try to kill me punching me in the head while trying to drown me in a pool. I didnt think clearly, and I didn't expect anyone to in a bad situation.
 
Oct 10, 2011
4,488
0
0
chadachada123 said:
username sucks said:
What? Hes being complemented for this? In the video you can clearly see that they turn to run as soon as he pulls the gun, but he still keeps shooting them as they are running. He did react quickly, but he also definitly overreacted here. If they are already running, why whould he shoot them? I would complement him if he stopped shooting as soon as he noticed that they were running, but he keeps shooting even at the guy who is crawling out the door.
Captcha: Lets be serious now
I did not see them running until several shots were already fired. What I saw was the front one taking cover for a moment before running.

The shots were justified.

As far as the "keep shooting" thing, you ALWAYS keep shooting until you are out of danger, when your life is in danger. That's one of the first rules of firearm defense. You always shoot to kill in a shoot-out scenario, and you keep firing until you are out or until the threat is absolutely eliminated.

What we saw was the would-be thieves leave out the door, but that doesn't mean that they wouldn't have just taken cover behind the door. His shots certainly discouraged that idea.
Like I said, his shooting is justified at the beginning, but the part I didnt like was continuing to fire at a guy he already hit, and who was crawling to get away. Even if that is standard firearm defense, I still question it because in my opinion that part is just wrong. I thought it was overreacting m=because of the stressful situation, but people that had plenty of time to think about it say to do this? Now that is plain wrong.
 
Oct 10, 2011
4,488
0
0
irmasterlol said:
username sucks said:
Kopikatsu said:
username sucks said:
What? Hes being complemented for this? In the video you can clearly see that they turn to run as soon as he pulls the gun, but he still keeps shooting them as they are running. He did react quickly, but he also definitly overreacted here. If they are already running, why whould he shoot them? I would complement him if he stopped shooting as soon as he noticed that they were running, but he keeps shooting even at the guy who is crawling out the door.
Captcha: Lets be serious now
I have a class D security license, and I can tell you that Security Guards are told the same thing that cops are. You only draw your gun if you're going to use it. Once you start shooting, you keep shooting until the target is dead or out of your LOS. There are no other options.

Which is why I feel this is kind of 'eh'. You're only supposed to draw your gun as a last resort (I would say that in this case it's justified because the three guys were armed, BUT did the security guard really have enough time to realize that they were armed? I'm not sure...)
Still, shooting at a guy thats crawling away and obviously not a threat anymore? That is pretty low, even if you are instructed to do that.
How does being on the floor make you no longer a threat? You may be European and therefore unaware of this, but guns still work when you're laying down. For all that guard knew, the failed robber was about to turn around and start shooting back.
Sorry, but not that it matters, Im American. Also, if you get shot, your thought process is more likely to be "holy shit Im getting out of here" than " I'll just walk it off and rob this place that still has a security guard pointing a gun at me"
 

Signa

Noisy Lurker
Legacy
Jul 16, 2008
4,746
6
43
Country
USA
The Human Torch said:
Signa said:
The Human Torch said:
Signa said:
If it was anything like that other attempted internet cafe robbery, then this guy did the right thing, no question about it.

Seeing the video shows some guys being stopped before they could actually cause harm, which is admittedly a little off-putting. It's harder to 100% justify shooting someone when their only crime up to that point was acting rowdy with a strange sense of apparel. Do I have any doubt that they were up to no good? None at all.
Are you fucking kidding me? Please read your own post again and get back to me on how many things are wrong with that statement. In the meantime I will be busy banging my head against my desk.
Quite flaming me, human torch. I'm agreeing with the situation. Judging by your quoted post I read, you agree too. I just know the gun control advocates love to be whiners about some of these things. "oh dear, he hadn't opened fire on any innocents yet, so he didn't deserve life-threatening injuries!" I was showing them the ground they have to stand on with those statements, and how shallow it was. Could I possibly could have phrased something better? Maybe.
I completely misread your post, consider my first reply retracted. My apologies.
Well, as long as you didn't give yourself a concussion for headdesking, mind telling me what you thought I meant? Since I wrote it, it's hard to misread it and know what you were thinking.
 

axlryder

victim of VR
Jul 29, 2011
1,862
0
0
DoPo said:
No worries, I didn't even remember that game until I saw your post. And I realised I haven't heard anybody mention it in...a very long tome. We're talking 8+ years here. You're excused.

But if you have the opportunity, do try DA4, say if they release it on GOG or something. It's incredibly fun game - a deer is hunting hunters. And he looks like this

Also, you get fart powers. And lots of hilarious quotes.
The image has told me everything I need to know. Playing this game is now mandatory. I only wish I'd known of its existence sooner. Kind of looks like Earthworm Jim meets Duke Nukem.