IDK bout that one, the first one is rather important for you to understand the second one.siffty said:f.e.a.r 2
I think the question would have been better posed as something like "Which games will make less sense/lessen your enjoyment if you only play the sequel", and it still really depends on how much you value story in a game. I really enjoy a good story, and it can sometimes keep me playing when the game is a bit crap, but if someone is only playing for the game part the story matters little.eggcarrier said:This more or less sums it up. I think it would be harder to find a sequel that required a play-through the original game first. Most games nowadays use the sequel to update the game system and encourage more people to play it; updating the story comes more as an after thought.zombflux said:What sequels can't you play without playing the first?
That having been said, I doubt I would enjoy the upcoming Mass Effect 2 without finishing the first one. And as rhyno said earlier, the Kingdom Hearts series is more difficult to follow without having some idea what happened the first go around.
But then, that's what wikipedia is for...
I get distracted during dailies, it goes something like this "Hey Arthena, come and help kill the dragon" me "Ohhhhhhh, flower". And thats how I have switched guilds 10 times over.Enzeru92 said:That's true one of my guild mates got pissed just cause i never played any of the other warcraft games. Needless to say i never healed for any of his daily heroicsJaywebbs said:World or Warcraft, although it pisses some people off if you haven't at least played Warcraft 3, That is if you try talking about lore.