Seriously, stop calling it the "God Particle"

Recommended Videos

Exterminas

New member
Sep 22, 2009
1,130
0
0
Cool Story Bro, but I have to agree that I never head anyone use that expression before.

Must be a Sun-Fox/News-Kind-of-thing.
 

TimeLord

For the Emperor!
Legacy
Aug 15, 2008
7,506
3
43
I thought the term 'God Particle' was just supposed to convey it's imporance, not to have anything to do with god or what not.
 

Mr. 47

New member
May 25, 2011
435
0
0
While the name does represent the particles affects rather well, I agree. It makes some religious groups irritated to have their god compared to a particle. I find it kind of funny how people view this as belief, or disbelief, in god. It has a 'blasphemous' nickname, but that doesn't make the particle 'against god.' Most monotheistic, if not all, believe that god created everything, this is just something else he/she/it created, god just used it a lot.

Kind of nice to know that there are great scientists among us gamers, shows that we're all not a bunch of 12 year olds and murderers.
 

chuketek

New member
Sep 28, 2009
70
0
0
Von Strimmer said:
What are you doing on this website? You should be with LHC practicing science!

Now go do science!
and lo, xkcd did say: http://xkcd.com/303/

thethingthatlurks said:
...Here's his website: http://www.badscience.net/
Why not start something like that for particle physics? With that whole CERN=destroyer of worlds, and that "God's particle" malarkey, you should have plenty of starting material.

...would you be interested in doing an IAMA here?
See, this is one of the reasons I love the internet. It lets people who actually know what they're talking about reach out to anyone who's genuinely searching for the answers.
Doing my own one seems like far too much work.
Also, at the risk of breaking my apparently knowledgeable image, what's an IAMA?
Google tells me:
International Artist Managers' Association
International Antiquarian Mapsellers Association
International Acoustic Music Awards
etc. etc.
 

orangeapples

New member
Aug 1, 2009
1,836
0
0
I guess there should have been a catchier name than 'Higgs Boson'

Science really does need to find more fun names for different things like this. Most regular people will not remember something like 'Higgs Boson', sadly that would be asking a lot from them. If a regular person were looking at the words 'Higgs Boson' and 'God Particle', the first is two unfamiliar words and the second are words that make for an easy understanding.

Remember Laminin?

Trying to remember scientific names is hard. You science people need to pick simpler words.
 

Handbag1992

New member
Apr 20, 2009
322
0
0
Somewhat similar to Stem Cells, although "Stem Cell" is the proper name. There are entire groups of people that think scientists are monsters that harvest the brain-stems of newborn babies. We get Stem Cells from the umbilical cord.
 

chuketek

New member
Sep 28, 2009
70
0
0
GeneWard said:
You people are misguided, blind bigots. Go to a church if you want to hear the truth, not the liberal lies spread by the likes of scientists. Na, I'm just fucking with you
Damn, you had me going for a second there.
 

Owlslayer

New member
Nov 26, 2009
1,953
0
0
Well, i didn't know it was being called a God particle, and i won't call it that, either.
So... good, i guess?
 

Mr. Google

New member
Jan 31, 2010
1,264
0
0
Ive never even heard God Particle before but 1. Awesome job keep up the good work I could never do that stuff I'm not smart enough. 2. That part at the end about "You should read it sometime" would have pissed me off so much. Unless it was a friend I would have told them off. Kudos to you for keeping your cool.
 

MassiveGeek

New member
Jan 11, 2009
1,213
0
0
Thank you for the interesting post, and fuck me, but "God Particle"? It doesn't sound cool, it sounds retarded.

I'll probably be looking into this, it seems really interesting.
 

GoodOmens

New member
Apr 23, 2011
54
0
0
imnotparanoid said:
Wait who ever called it that?
Leon Lederman, in his 1994 book "The God Particle: If the Universe is the Answer, What is the Question?" He did sort of win a Nobel Prize in Physics, so he sort of knows what he's talking about. I'm not sure if he was the first to use the name, and I doubt he meant it with any explicitly religious connotations
 

DeathWyrmNexus

New member
Jan 5, 2008
1,143
0
0
Thamous said:
Anyone believes the term "God Particle" has anything more than a completely superficial religious significance is an idiot. It is simply a term used to indicate the importance of this particular particle. It is astounding that people can honestly believe that scientist would ever make such a costly initiative to prove or disprove any sort of deity.
Pretty much this. It is an apt nickname and shouldn't be sabotaged by idiots. If he thought that telling you to read a creation myth would make you a theist, he already had a preconceived notion of how things worked and your explanation wasn't going to do dick.

However, I did enjoy your OP post since I didn't know the whole Electromagnetism connects everything part. I probably should have but that is bad on me and I appreciate the snippet of education.
 

thethingthatlurks

New member
Feb 16, 2010
2,101
0
0
chuketek said:
Von Strimmer said:
What are you doing on this website? You should be with LHC practicing science!

Now go do science!
and lo, xkcd did say: http://xkcd.com/303/

thethingthatlurks said:
...Here's his website: http://www.badscience.net/
Why not start something like that for particle physics? With that whole CERN=destroyer of worlds, and that "God's particle" malarkey, you should have plenty of starting material.

...would you be interested in doing an IAMA here?
See, this is one of the reasons I love the internet. It lets people who actually know what they're talking about reach out to anyone who's genuinely searching for the answers.
Doing my own one seems like far too much work.
Also, at the risk of breaking my apparently knowledgeable image, what's an IAMA?
Google tells me:
International Artist Managers' Association
International Antiquarian Mapsellers Association
International Acoustic Music Awards
etc. etc.
IAMA=I am a. It's basically a Q&A session that's very popular on reddit. You write a brief introduction "IAMA physicist working at CERN," people ask their questions, and you respond for however long you want. Given that you have such an amazing job (seriously, I would pack my bags and move to Geneva in a heartbeat if there were any use for a 20-something nerd pursuing a MS degree in theoretical chemistry at CERN), I think it would be a great opportunity for the people here to learn about CERN, particle/theoretical physics, and what being a scientist working in one of the most impressive laboratories on earth is like.
 

CAMDAWG

New member
Jul 27, 2011
116
0
0
GoodOmens said:
imnotparanoid said:
Wait who ever called it that?
Leon Lederman, in his 1994 book "The God Particle: If the Universe is the Answer, What is the Question?" He did sort of win a Nobel Prize in Physics, so he sort of knows what he's talking about. I'm not sure if he was the first to use the name, and I doubt he meant it with any explicitly religious connotations
Yep, he was the first. He said in a foreword added to a newer edition that it was initially a joke, and a working title for the book that ended up sticking. I think somewhere else he said he disliked it (in my own words) because it offended physicists, as it over-exaggerated the importance, and it offended the highly religious because, well, it used the word god, and therefore undermines them.

But don't quote me on the second part, I can't remember where it's from.
 

SiNCry

New member
Jan 21, 2010
27
0
0
Well, I have to say, that was a rather enjoyable read.
To answer your question, no, I don't think we can stop calling it the God Particle. It just (to some) sounds better and, as you said, creates an image. I don't call it that, I just think people will always call it the "God Particle".
 

Saltyk

Sane among the insane.
Sep 12, 2010
16,755
0
0
Ghengis John said:
Saltyk said:
Well, next will be the "Jesus Particle". Then, the "Buddha Particle". Then, the "Muhammad Particle". Then, the, um... "Satan Particle"?
I can just imagine the firestorm right now: "Don't research the Satan particle!".
Just wait until they start researching the "Armageddon Particle". All the crazies will start predicting the "End Times".
[sub]So, basically it'll be a Tuesday.[/sub]
 

MartialArc

New member
Aug 25, 2010
150
0
0
Personally I'd kinda like for string theory to go away as I've never really felt it deserves the attention it got. Seems like academic politics made it the leading theory over actual scientific merit. So in a way I'm glad to finally see it get tested in some way, and hopeful that when no higgs boson is found the fiasco ends. I realize that it probably won't, and the string theory faithful will just keep hammering away trying to make it work. Holy crap! It's almost like a religion itself! =). Maybe God particle is somewhat of an adept name.

On the other hand, failing to find the higgs boson will certainly be used as ammo by creationists.

I don't see much upshot either way =\, so I'm very torn.
 

chuketek

New member
Sep 28, 2009
70
0
0
thethingthatlurks said:
IAMA=I am a. It's basically a Q&A session that's very popular on reddit. You write a brief introduction "IAMA physicist working at CERN," people ask their questions, and you respond for however long you want.
Sure, sounds like it could be interesting.
Although my code has now finished compiling and I need to get back to work...
 

Von Strimmer

New member
Apr 17, 2011
375
0
0
chuketek said:
Von Strimmer said:
What are you doing on this website? You should be with LHC practicing science!

Now go do science!
and lo, xkcd did say: http://xkcd.com/303/
Haha good little comic. You could always bring out the tried and true "Can it wait for a bit I'm in the middle of some callibrations".