Cool Story Bro, but I have to agree that I never head anyone use that expression before.
Must be a Sun-Fox/News-Kind-of-thing.
Must be a Sun-Fox/News-Kind-of-thing.
and lo, xkcd did say: http://xkcd.com/303/Von Strimmer said:What are you doing on this website? You should be with LHC practicing science!
Now go do science!
See, this is one of the reasons I love the internet. It lets people who actually know what they're talking about reach out to anyone who's genuinely searching for the answers.thethingthatlurks said:...Here's his website: http://www.badscience.net/
Why not start something like that for particle physics? With that whole CERN=destroyer of worlds, and that "God's particle" malarkey, you should have plenty of starting material.
...would you be interested in doing an IAMA here?
Damn, you had me going for a second there.GeneWard said:You people are misguided, blind bigots. Go to a church if you want to hear the truth, not the liberal lies spread by the likes of scientists. Na, I'm just fucking with you
Leon Lederman, in his 1994 book "The God Particle: If the Universe is the Answer, What is the Question?" He did sort of win a Nobel Prize in Physics, so he sort of knows what he's talking about. I'm not sure if he was the first to use the name, and I doubt he meant it with any explicitly religious connotationsimnotparanoid said:Wait who ever called it that?
Pretty much this. It is an apt nickname and shouldn't be sabotaged by idiots. If he thought that telling you to read a creation myth would make you a theist, he already had a preconceived notion of how things worked and your explanation wasn't going to do dick.Thamous said:Anyone believes the term "God Particle" has anything more than a completely superficial religious significance is an idiot. It is simply a term used to indicate the importance of this particular particle. It is astounding that people can honestly believe that scientist would ever make such a costly initiative to prove or disprove any sort of deity.
IAMA=I am a. It's basically a Q&A session that's very popular on reddit. You write a brief introduction "IAMA physicist working at CERN," people ask their questions, and you respond for however long you want. Given that you have such an amazing job (seriously, I would pack my bags and move to Geneva in a heartbeat if there were any use for a 20-something nerd pursuing a MS degree in theoretical chemistry at CERN), I think it would be a great opportunity for the people here to learn about CERN, particle/theoretical physics, and what being a scientist working in one of the most impressive laboratories on earth is like.chuketek said:and lo, xkcd did say: http://xkcd.com/303/Von Strimmer said:What are you doing on this website? You should be with LHC practicing science!
Now go do science!
See, this is one of the reasons I love the internet. It lets people who actually know what they're talking about reach out to anyone who's genuinely searching for the answers.thethingthatlurks said:...Here's his website: http://www.badscience.net/
Why not start something like that for particle physics? With that whole CERN=destroyer of worlds, and that "God's particle" malarkey, you should have plenty of starting material.
...would you be interested in doing an IAMA here?
Doing my own one seems like far too much work.
Also, at the risk of breaking my apparently knowledgeable image, what's an IAMA?
Google tells me:
International Artist Managers' Association
International Antiquarian Mapsellers Association
International Acoustic Music Awards
etc. etc.
Yep, he was the first. He said in a foreword added to a newer edition that it was initially a joke, and a working title for the book that ended up sticking. I think somewhere else he said he disliked it (in my own words) because it offended physicists, as it over-exaggerated the importance, and it offended the highly religious because, well, it used the word god, and therefore undermines them.GoodOmens said:Leon Lederman, in his 1994 book "The God Particle: If the Universe is the Answer, What is the Question?" He did sort of win a Nobel Prize in Physics, so he sort of knows what he's talking about. I'm not sure if he was the first to use the name, and I doubt he meant it with any explicitly religious connotationsimnotparanoid said:Wait who ever called it that?
Just wait until they start researching the "Armageddon Particle". All the crazies will start predicting the "End Times".Ghengis John said:I can just imagine the firestorm right now: "Don't research the Satan particle!".Saltyk said:Well, next will be the "Jesus Particle". Then, the "Buddha Particle". Then, the "Muhammad Particle". Then, the, um... "Satan Particle"?
Sure, sounds like it could be interesting.thethingthatlurks said:IAMA=I am a. It's basically a Q&A session that's very popular on reddit. You write a brief introduction "IAMA physicist working at CERN," people ask their questions, and you respond for however long you want.
Haha good little comic. You could always bring out the tried and true "Can it wait for a bit I'm in the middle of some callibrations".chuketek said:and lo, xkcd did say: http://xkcd.com/303/Von Strimmer said:What are you doing on this website? You should be with LHC practicing science!
Now go do science!