I knew a kid in high school who pulled this, except his dad was a soldier, and taught him all he knew, so clearly, he was just as right as a real soldier.
Well... Let me get this out of the way first. I served my country as well. Did my time in the Army, did a deployment to Iraq. Got into combat, all that. That being said, I don't use my combat experience to win arguments unless it pertains to anything military related. Now I would also like to point out, not every serviceman or servicewoman acts like that. Its sad that alot of the servicemembers you've met do act like that, as they have seemingly painted a picture for you that ALL servicemembers act in that way. I myself and most of the vets Ive been around and served with all have very open minds on things, and we tend to call out folks that are closed minded as well. I'm not saying youre wrong for calling BS when you see it. I applaud that. Just try to be a little more open minded. Now I do try to win arguments all the time, I have that kind of personality, but I use my knowledge that I've gathered through research, personal experience and what not to win, not just the blanket "I carried a rifle so I know what Im talking about" statement.Mid-Boss said:Snip
My god! Really? I have no words ... but this explains a lot.Mid-Boss said:That's because if a movie depicts the army it has to pass a military board and get approval otherwise it wont be allowed in theaters. If it doesn't present the military in a positive light, it doesn't get approval.Snoozer said:America is pretty strange about their military. How they always are so proud of their soldiers that protect their country (while actually causing more people to become a potential threat to it)
Also in movies, the American military has way to much of a positive reputation.
Seven years Navy here, and agree with the above completely. Although I'll take issue with some of the posters who are stereotyping military members as nothing but "dumb grunts trained to take orders". Like anywhere else, it varies a lot. We had the guys who couldn't figure out which end of the mop to hold and we had some amazingly smart guys, mostly in the technical rates (not saying there were no smart Boatswains mates. I met one once).slash2x said:Speaking as a former military member...... anyone who uses that in an argument is a moron, and they were morons while they were enlisted probably too.
You don't have to be a veteran to point out political hypocrisy.Belaam said:As a veteran, you shouldn't necessarily give our words additional weight because we are veterans.
And you have to do that, because I'm a veteran. ;p
Personally, I only play the veteran card when someone is doing something that drives me nuts like supporting candidates who cut military medical benefits while simultaneously having a "support our troops" sticker on their car.
Not necessarily. Only if they want military assistance in making the film. If people are wearing their uniforms correctly and you're getting long, lingering shots of US military as totally awesome (looking at you, Bruckheimer) it's military-approved. If they're in Marine fatigues with Navy insignia, not so much.Mid-Boss said:That's because if a movie depicts the army it has to pass a military board and get approval otherwise it wont be allowed in theaters. If it doesn't present the military in a positive light, it doesn't get approval.
The goverment spending that money on people rather then corporations is not the same as giving the money away. Yes there is a problem with simply handing a million dollars to everyone, but giving it to corporations in an effort to increase lending and preventing job loss (neither of which has ever proved effective in the past) was a horrendous waste of money.Fagotto said:manaman said:This is just another skewed story. It's presented from one side as that person remembers it.
I don't doubt that the person worked military experience into the situation, but I highly doubt it played out exactly like that, like some kind of trump card with no other relevance to the discussion.
Really it seems the OP and the vet where arguing about something neither of them had any right to be arguing about except from a purely philosophical viewpoint, as neither seemed to have any idea what they where actually talking about.
No, actually the OP was quite right to point out the problem with everyone being millionaires. Incredibly obvious reason why the OP is right: Who is going to be making bread for less than something like $1000 when they're a millionaire?
No, he's full of shit. The only thing the military does is loan out its equipment to movies under the condition that they depict the US military positively.Snoozer said:My god! Really? I have no words ... but this explains a lot.Mid-Boss said:That's because if a movie depicts the army it has to pass a military board and get approval otherwise it wont be allowed in theaters. If it doesn't present the military in a positive light, it doesn't get approval.Snoozer said:America is pretty strange about their military. How they always are so proud of their soldiers that protect their country (while actually causing more people to become a potential threat to it)
Also in movies, the American military has way to much of a positive reputation.
Ann Coulter often claims the left does this, not by stating, "I"m a soldier" but that, "I'm a victim" and we're all supposed to shut off our brains and shut our mouths: someone with better credentials has spoken and we just better shut our mouths.Mid-Boss said:This is going to be a touchy subject since we Americans idolize soldiers as much as we do. So I'm going to establish right off the bat that I respect soldiers for what they done and the sacrifices they've made. This wont stop most of the knee jerk reaction I'm sure this will get but maybe some of it.
That being said, I don't think being a soldier automatically means their opinions are right. But they bring up their combat history as if that makes all their opinions right.
I was recently arguing with a very right wing old man who stated "If Obama had given us all that bail out money every American would be a millionaire right now!"
And I said "But if we were all millionaires then a load of bread would cost a thousand dollars."
"I'm a soldier and I had three tours in Vietnam and that's not how it works."
Long awkward pause because, I too, respect soldiers and I wondered if I should pursue this or just let it go.... But fuck this guy. I don't care if you're Superman, stupidity is stupidity. So I said "It's called INFLATION. The more money we have the more things cost! If everyone had ten times more money then everything would COST ten times more. It's basic economics."
The argument went on and skewed off into other subjects like how he thought the rich shouldn't be taxed at all because they give us jobs and we should honor them for that etc etc etc. But the sticking point for me was... He brought up his combat history repeatedly as if killing people in Vietnam made his opinion more correct than mine. And he got very... VERY upset that no matter how many times he brought up that he was a soldier, I wouldn't back down.
Honestly, he's not the only one. I've seen soldiers bring up that they are soldiers, their tours, etc many times as a way to establish their own credibility.
If I used my job I'd say "I'm a janitor of two years and I clean shit off walls put there by ignorant slob tourists and my opinion of economic reform is this!" See how ridiculous that sounded? That's what I feel when they try to pull their combat history into a discussion that has nothing to do with combat.
But they can do it not get called out on it.
Come now, we're all gamers here. His opinions might not be more right than yours, but since he killed more people than you, he IS higher level.Mid-Boss said:He brought up his combat history repeatedly as if killing people in Vietnam made his opinion more correct than mine.