Hence the "silly" reasoning.Super Toast said:That's a shame. King Kong is actually one of the good ones.badgersprite said:"It's a tie in to a movie/TV series."
Never opened that King Kong game, never will.
Hence the "silly" reasoning.Super Toast said:That's a shame. King Kong is actually one of the good ones.badgersprite said:"It's a tie in to a movie/TV series."
Never opened that King Kong game, never will.
that is EXACTLY my problem, except taken to THE EXTREME! i wouldnt play silent hill 3 and i'd played 2. i wouldnt play tony hawk 4 until i played 2 and 3. i wouldnt play san andreas until i played III and vice city. i wouldnt play soul calibur iv without playing ii and iii. so many examples.PhunkyPhazon said:Lately I've been feeling like playing Zelda: Majora's Mask, but I can't bring myself to do that without playing Ocarina of Time first. Why? Because MM is a direct sequel, so it feels like I'm starting a game halfway through the overall story. I know it's stupid, just because you're the same character doesn't mean the stories themselves are all that connected. Does anyone have this 'sequel conundrum' as I'm calling it?
And what other dumb reasons do you have or have heard for not wanting to play a game?
I notice you not needing to play the actual origional of something,Ashcrexl said:that is EXACTLY my problem, except taken to THE EXTREME! i wouldnt play silent hill 3 and i'd played 2. i wouldnt play tony hawk 4 until i played 2 and 3. i wouldnt play san andreas until i played III and vice city. i wouldnt play soul calibur iv without playing ii and iii. so many examples.PhunkyPhazon said:Lately I've been feeling like playing Zelda: Majora's Mask, but I can't bring myself to do that without playing Ocarina of Time first. Why? Because MM is a direct sequel, so it feels like I'm starting a game halfway through the overall story. I know it's stupid, just because you're the same character doesn't mean the stories themselves are all that connected. Does anyone have this 'sequel conundrum' as I'm calling it?
And what other dumb reasons do you have or have heard for not wanting to play a game?
right now, i'm trying to play through liberty city stories on ps2 before i allow myself to play vice city stories on psp.
this sometimes is a good idea because the sequels do everything so much better and its hard to go back. majora's mask is not an example of this by the way.
i decided that i didnt want to play the original tony hawk or the original silent hill period.moretimethansense said:I notice you not needing to play the actual origional of something,Ashcrexl said:that is EXACTLY my problem, except taken to THE EXTREME! i wouldnt play silent hill 3 and i'd played 2. i wouldnt play tony hawk 4 until i played 2 and 3. i wouldnt play san andreas until i played III and vice city. i wouldnt play soul calibur iv without playing ii and iii. so many examples.PhunkyPhazon said:Lately I've been feeling like playing Zelda: Majora's Mask, but I can't bring myself to do that without playing Ocarina of Time first. Why? Because MM is a direct sequel, so it feels like I'm starting a game halfway through the overall story. I know it's stupid, just because you're the same character doesn't mean the stories themselves are all that connected. Does anyone have this 'sequel conundrum' as I'm calling it?
And what other dumb reasons do you have or have heard for not wanting to play a game?
right now, i'm trying to play through liberty city stories on ps2 before i allow myself to play vice city stories on psp.
this sometimes is a good idea because the sequels do everything so much better and its hard to go back. majora's mask is not an example of this by the way.
Oversight, or actual quirk?
also LCS ties into GTA3 but not VCS which ties into Vice City, also they're both prequals.
May I ask why or should I assume it's because of the "it's old" argument that I so despise?Ashcrexl said:i decided that i didnt want to play the original tony hawk or the original silent hill period.moretimethansense said:I notice you not needing to play the actual origional of something,Ashcrexl said:that is EXACTLY my problem, except taken to THE EXTREME! i wouldnt play silent hill 3 and i'd played 2. i wouldnt play tony hawk 4 until i played 2 and 3. i wouldnt play san andreas until i played III and vice city. i wouldnt play soul calibur iv without playing ii and iii. so many examples.PhunkyPhazon said:Lately I've been feeling like playing Zelda: Majora's Mask, but I can't bring myself to do that without playing Ocarina of Time first. Why? Because MM is a direct sequel, so it feels like I'm starting a game halfway through the overall story. I know it's stupid, just because you're the same character doesn't mean the stories themselves are all that connected. Does anyone have this 'sequel conundrum' as I'm calling it?
And what other dumb reasons do you have or have heard for not wanting to play a game?
right now, i'm trying to play through liberty city stories on ps2 before i allow myself to play vice city stories on psp.
this sometimes is a good idea because the sequels do everything so much better and its hard to go back. majora's mask is not an example of this by the way.
Oversight, or actual quirk?
also LCS ties into GTA3 but not VCS which ties into Vice City, also they're both prequals.
Yeah. Totally agree abut Halo, amazing soundtrack.Cowabungaa said:That doesn't sound like a silly reason to me. Music, and sound in general, is a big factor in setting the tone of a game and helps create the atmosphere. Halo for example, if you ask me, was changed from being a smooth but otherwise not very special Doom-ish (yes, I said it, it's a lot closer to that than the rain of CoD-like games) shooter to an epic battle against superior forces mostly thanks to it's outstanding music.
And a game could be brought down for the same reason.
I couldn't agree more. I'm getting fed up with zombies being tacked onto everything now. I was really looking forward to some RDR DLC but this just has no appeal to me whatsoever.Judgement101 said:RDR because they made a zombie DLC, I dispise anything that tosses away its main premise for zombies.
That's why I didn't bother with it.imahobbit4062 said:The DLC has NOTHING to do with the story of the original, It's a brand new story that isn't cannon.Judgement101 said:RDR because they made a zombie DLC, I dispise anything that tosses away its main premise for zombies.
Understandable, I did the same thing, just with the actual gameplay execution.MiracleOfSound said:I don't want to play Bayonetta because I don't like the music.
GAH! Thank you for bringing this up!zombiesinc said:When people refuse to play games that are popular or mainstream for only that reason...
Wow...that is...intense. At first I thought "Now that's funky!" but bloody hell it just keeps on going and going and going. Well lets do a quick youtube search whether I like some other songs better.MiracleOfSound said:Yeah. Totally agree abut Halo, amazing soundtrack.Cowabungaa said:That doesn't sound like a silly reason to me. Music, and sound in general, is a big factor in setting the tone of a game and helps create the atmosphere. Halo for example, if you ask me, was changed from being a smooth but otherwise not very special Doom-ish (yes, I said it, it's a lot closer to that than the rain of CoD-like games) shooter to an epic battle against superior forces mostly thanks to it's outstanding music.
And a game could be brought down for the same reason.
Bayonetta on the other hand.... just rapes my ears.
Those were turnoffs for me too to be honest. I mean, I have no problem if people find her attractive (personally I think she looks like a deformed giraffe) but the game keeps shoving her sexuality in your face so hard that it made me want to punch her, and the developers who insult my intelligence with such percieved titillation.Cowabungaa said:Well honestly I wouldn't get it for it's amazingly unattractive main character, screw hyper-sexualisation, and the fact that I suck monkeyballs at combo-based games like that. I learned my lesson with Ninja Gaiden 2.
Yep. Even my non-gaming girlfriend went 'what the fuck?' when she saw the trailer, because she knew how much I'd loved the very human and mature feel of the main game and could see how this undermined it.Cowabungaa said:Oh and I also agree about the zombie DLC for RDR. I loved that game, but when I saw read about that DLC I just sighed very deeply. Really guys, just, really?
It's more the tone that doesn't appeal to me, as opposed to the gameplay.imahobbit4062 said:The whole Zombie expansion still has a lot of what made RDR so great. The Challenges, Breaking the horses of Apocalypse, lots of fun and interesting side quests, and it's fucking brilliant. It's not just another zombie game.
RPGs age gracefully. Action games don't.RanD00M said:But haven't I read that you enjoy the Persona games. They're on the PS2.Onyx Oblivion said:I won't play MGS4 because I'm not willing to play MGS2 and 3, because they are on the PS2.
OT: I give all games a chance. There has never been an incident where I didn't want to play a game for something petty.