Simpsons Porn Parody Induces Vomiting

Recommended Videos

mr_rubino

New member
Sep 19, 2010
719
0
0
So... how many more times will we be seeing "Kill it with fire" in this topic? I could start a pool if you guys would like.
 

Dastardly

Imaginary Friend
Apr 19, 2010
2,420
0
0
Tom Goldman said:
Stop giving them ideas. Every time you utter a potential title, Rule 34 kicks in, and there will be porn of it within the fortnight. You're raping our childhoods, Tom!
 

Fumbleumble

New member
Oct 17, 2010
341
0
0
JdaS said:
Fumbleumble said:
Isn't bring disrepute on a franchise one of the main reasons to sue?.. shouldn't Warner and Fox be doing just that?

Asides from the porn though.. isn't all this copyright infringement? and the infringers ARE making money out of it, so what makes them so special they don't get sued, but mothers and children do?
I guess I could further imply that I've seen my fair share of these by telling you how they avoid that. They only bear a striking resemblance to the characters in the show, use a theme song that only almost sounds like the original one, don't use any copyrighted logos and use names that only sound similar to the ones in the show. Thus, legal problems averted.
I very much doubt it's different enough for the issues to be averted.. in fact it's not different at all, apart from the T & A... they use the likeness, the voices.. and above all the REAL name of the characters and the show (they also use the real names and likenesses of the characters in their superhero porn).

If what you said was relevent to the 'products' were talking about (what you said was quite true... but what you said doesn't hold true to what's been done) then yeah.. I'd certainly admit your point.

I think this all boils down to not wanting to pick a fight with an industry that's collectively worth more than they are, remember the porn industry has some pretty big pull unfortunately.. they don't mind 'fucking' the little guy (pardon the pun)... but they're not about to try it with someone who can afford better lawyers than they can.

I think if some private citizen had enough money then they could force some 'fairness' in the situation by protesting this matter.... I'm pretty sure the law says something about having to reasonably enforce your copyright or risk losing it.. and allowing someone else to publically make money by copyright infringement isn't reasonably doing so.

Yet another case of one law for the people and another for industry.
 

TheColdHeart

New member
Sep 15, 2008
728
0
0
That was weird to say the least, I'd love to see the god-awful 'narratives' they throw into the film. Also the Flanders character was pretty funny.
 

DeepComet5581

New member
Mar 30, 2010
518
0
0
In the words of Mr Burns: Excellent.

I wonder if he's going to be in it...

I wonder how much longer until the Futurama one...
 

BarbaricGoose

New member
May 25, 2010
795
0
0
That was hilarious, and I'll definitely watch it.

Just liked I watched "Who's Nailin' Paylin" (And the sequel) and "Sex Trek!"
 

The Last Nomad

Lost in Ethiopia
Oct 28, 2009
1,426
0
0
I didn't watch all of it, because it was loading oddly slowly, but they looked a little green don't you think?

And there already has been lots of Simpsons porn... trust me on that, don't go trying to find it, some of its probably a hellova lot worse than this.

Some one has probably mentioned this... but rule 34... If it exists, there is porn of it...
NOTHING IS SAFE!!!
 

crudus

New member
Oct 20, 2008
4,410
0
0
Ok, it was working for me when the tint was green and Marge's hair was down. All else I could just hear my childhood dying.
 

ENKC

New member
May 3, 2010
619
0
0
One visit to that blog-style site that documents porn parodies would cause you to realise that nearly every popular tv show and movie is either already parodied, or going to be. Rule 34 much?
 

ninja51

New member
Mar 28, 2010
342
0
0
Look when you get into "being faithfull to the source material" with porn, your just wierd. Its porn, dont hate it because its not in line with the freaking source material. Hate this porn because its gross looking and yellow people is a REALLY out there fetish that personally actually makes my junk shrink
 

Shoggoth2588

New member
Aug 31, 2009
10,247
0
0
Woah woah woah woah...there's a Justice League one!?

The Simpson's trailer didn't seem that bad. Isn't that the porn standard? If that's below average than I'm now a bit more seriously interested in the Justice League one.
 

Fetzenfisch

New member
Sep 11, 2009
2,454
0
0
ninja51 said:
Look when you get into "being faithfull to the source material" with porn, your just wierd. Its porn, dont hate it because its not in line with the freaking source material. Hate this porn because its gross looking and yellow people is a REALLY out there fetish that personally actually makes my junk shrink
But i have to say that their retro Batman parody is damn close to the original.And VERY funny too. Cut out the sex-scenes and you have a better parody than all those scary/fantastic/whatever-movie pieces of crap have been.
 
Mar 26, 2008
3,428
0
0
Well Marge herself said she usually brings her "A Game" to the bedroom so it could be quite distur.... I mean interesting. Then again self-praise is never worth much.

I wonder if they'll roll out the old McBain line "I feel like holding another meeting; in bed"
 

Doc Funky

New member
May 22, 2010
54
0
0
What's the big deal? I thought it was cute, harmless fun, and would gladly watch it if I got my hands on it for free.