Yours are all valid points, however, there have been more than a few of these over the past few years. Hell the Mario one was in the 80s I think. Here's the thing: nothing's happened. The fat cats can't have missed it since it's all over youtube and the rest of the tubes, so either they don't care or there's nothing they can do about it.Fumbleumble said:
If that were actually the movie they wouldn't show it here. If you happen to be THE WORST PERSON ALIVE and you actually PAY CASH MONEY for this, then you get to see the porn part. This is just the trailer.wildpeaks said:Oh, the mental image... Kill it with fire !thiosk said:
Also, how is that even remotely porn ? They're just painted yellowish, keep their clothes on and do.. well nothing (and no one). Am I too old fashioned ?
No, they've just caught up with 30 years of Rule 34 [http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Rule%2034].Tom Goldman said:
Rule 35 [http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Rule%2035].Rpground said:
I just have a hard time (oo-er) seeing why this isn't copyright infringement..... I'd be curious how far an 'amature' would get when doing stuff like this... People have been sued into oblivion for far less.. and there have been cases built on far sketchier evidence.JdaS said:
End of the video has the url to the real site for it and you can see a more.... "hardcore" trailer and other "extras"Swaki said:well i think its because the trailer dont want to give away to much, something Hollywood should learn, and there might be a more graphic trailer but i doubt the escapist would link to that, kinda curious if they are painted all over and have dyed all the hair.wildpeaks said:Oh, the mental image... Kill it with fire !thiosk said:
Also, how is that even remotely porn ? They're just painted yellowish, keep their clothes on and do.. well nothing (and no one). Am I too old fashioned ?
