Simpsons Porn Parody Induces Vomiting
- Thread starter Tom Goldman
- Start date
Surprisingly well-made, and, dare I say, pretty funny.
Once you get past that though, and think about all the characters having sex with each other, that's where my sanity begins to leak out of my skull.
Once you get past that though, and think about all the characters having sex with each other, that's where my sanity begins to leak out of my skull.
Parody adult media by all means.. but when they start parodying media that has as much relevence to kid's entertainment then I think the line has to be drawn.
Comics and cartoons, nah... that's just too much.
Isn't bring disrepute on a franchise one of the main reasons to sue?.. shouldn't Warner and Fox be doing just that?
Asides from the porn though.. isn't all this copyright infringement? and the infringers ARE making money out of it, so what makes them so special they don't get sued, but mothers and children do?
Comics and cartoons, nah... that's just too much.
Isn't bring disrepute on a franchise one of the main reasons to sue?.. shouldn't Warner and Fox be doing just that?
Asides from the porn though.. isn't all this copyright infringement? and the infringers ARE making money out of it, so what makes them so special they don't get sued, but mothers and children do?
And yet people still need to scream 'ZOMGZ' about it - I guess few people genuinely understand this simple, succinct rule that is probably the only thing that is 100% true in this world. Ah well... *shrug*Ranooth said:
As for me...no vomiting on my part. Heck, I was amused more than anything. I guess that's usually the thing with porn these days for me - either it's hilariously bad or it's actually good. Vomiting? Sheeeit...we're way past that phase.
I believe the operative term is "WhatthefuckIdon'teven"
Honestly, I barely understand rule 34 as a whole, but this is just too creepy.
Honestly, I barely understand rule 34 as a whole, but this is just too creepy.
Wow, that was actually quite good in terms of the voices and some vaguely jokey bits, though I think as soon as it gets to the sex it'll all fall apart. Even the bit where McBain & girl starting kissing was quite jarring, going from 'heh, this is a fairly good live action Simpsons' to 'oh...porn'.
I'm ok with this.
I love it when porn doesn't take itself too seriously.
PS: that Marge there was pretty hot.
I love it when porn doesn't take itself too seriously.
PS: that Marge there was pretty hot.
I guess I could further imply that I've seen my fair share of these by telling you how they avoid that. They only bear a striking resemblance to the characters in the show, use a theme song that only almost sounds like the original one, don't use any copyrighted logos and use names that only sound similar to the ones in the show. Thus, legal problems averted.Fumbleumble said:
No offense Tom, but don't see how any of it is relevant... porn producers are just jumping on that parody bandwagon (for God knows what reasons, I certainly don't find it arousing, even when they hire decent porn stars for it) and they've been through normal movies as well already. Not much here other than just another IP they're taking to make a porn out of. And yeah, as all porn, if you're looking at the story in it, you're not doin' it rite.
I have to do one of two things now....
1. Wash out my mind's eye by bleaching my brain
2. Build a time machine so I can stop myself from pressing the play button on that trailer.
I'll let you guys know which one I decide on.
1. Wash out my mind's eye by bleaching my brain
2. Build a time machine so I can stop myself from pressing the play button on that trailer.
I'll let you guys know which one I decide on.
