Simulated Mars Mission Turned Astronauts Lazy

Mycroft Holmes

New member
Sep 26, 2011
850
0
0
I like how they casually referred to reading as a waste of time, 'non-productive' activity.

Also how was he playing counter-strike? That's an exclusively multiplayer game. The latency you would get via messages sent from space would make it completely worthless, unless they were just playing on LAN. If not, then that isn't much of an experiment, what with their having an easy and constant way to interact with dozens of other people in real time. And no freaking wonder he would be interested in doing that rather than doing other things while locked in a tiny room.
 

Vhite

New member
Aug 17, 2009
1,980
0
0
So this is what was wrong with my entire life.
 

dmase

New member
Mar 12, 2009
2,117
0
0
I bet everyone at NASA is thinking... that's why we have a vetting process for our astronauts, to avoid that shit.
 

Jadak

New member
Nov 4, 2008
2,136
0
0
GoddyofAus said:
I'm not sure how this is a problem, because if I were an Astronaut, I know I wouldn't be all lazy and lethargic at the end of the journey when YOU'RE ABOUT TO BE THE FIRST HUMANS EVER TO STEP FOOT ON A FOREIGN PLANET IN HISTORY.

I dunno about the rest of you, but I'd be pretty fucking excited.
You'd be excited for s while, sure. 17 months stuck in a fucking box tends to change that, regardless of the purpose. Might still perk up a bit around the end though.
 

Phuctifyno

New member
Jul 6, 2010
418
0
0
Jandau said:
Oh, and for every thing that can go wrong during the trip there, you still have the trip back to look forward to.
Nope. Manned mission to Mars is planned as a one way. You'd pretty much have to be ready die the whole time, knowing that that even if you make it there, you're not leaving until you do. Wonder if that's going to have an effect on the astronaut's survival skills?
 

uzo

New member
Jul 5, 2011
710
0
0
They should have installed a computer that was programemd to go insane halfway into the trip and promptly tried to kill them all.

That would have motivated them.



Or killed them.
 

havoc33

New member
Jun 26, 2012
278
0
0
I still can't believe that NASA is serious about doing this. Just makes watching scifi even more exciting, some of the shit is now actually plausible in the near future! My girlfriend (who is an adamant scifi hater) will have a hard time accepting this, lol
 

Snownine

New member
Apr 19, 2010
577
0
0
Legion said:
By the time we are able to get to Mars we'd have probably invented the kind of cryosleep that allows you to spend the entire journey under anyway. So they'd not have to worry about boredom and such.
Cryosleep technology is much further off than manned travel to Mars. We are not even close to achieving cryosleep whereas we can put people on the moon in a couple decades if NASA had the kind of funding and focus it did in the 60's and early 70's. In fact if the space race between the USA and USSR had not all but died in 70's someone would likely have had a man on Mars in the 90's. With the joke budget and lack of enthusiasm that plagues space agencies today who knows when we will send humans to Mars, if ever.