Erm it's not AC:3, it's like San Andreas in the sense that it's not a numbered sequel. If it were it'd be AC:4 considering Brotherhood.Kurokasumi said:And well Assassins creed 3, I just want to see how it all ends. It's also just a fun game.
Erm it's not AC:3, it's like San Andreas in the sense that it's not a numbered sequel. If it were it'd be AC:4 considering Brotherhood.Kurokasumi said:And well Assassins creed 3, I just want to see how it all ends. It's also just a fun game.
Well that's the thing about DLC, you don't have to buy it.honestdiscussioner said:Revelations. I'd totally get Skyrim, but I don't want to drop $60 and then have to drop an additional $40 on the DLC.
thats if i can over look the whole fantasy element lol i have very few exceptions to my gaming preferences.. i hate RTS games, but i loved company of heroes, i genrally hate all space/futeristic games but loved Halo so skyrim could be the fantasy exceptionAlotFirst said:Well, I originally ignored Fallout 3 because I wasn't interested in a post-apocalyptic world. But as I read more reviews I noticed how similar it was to Oblivion, so I bought it and loved it. Not because of the theme/IP/atmosphere but because of the typical open-world gameplay.silverbullet1989 said:BF3 and Halo Remake
im more and more tempted by skyrim although i have never played oblivion, but i did get into fallout 3 and new vegas... just the whole fantasy stuff isnt for me, but skyrim looks amazing... ahhhhh dunno what to do!
Skyrim will still be using the same gameplay formula, but with more content.
Short answer: If you like Fallout 3/New Vegas, youu'll probably like Oblivion/Skyrim.