Baby Tea said:
Looks like they've missed the point too.
There was a thread on a similar topic recently, so I'll just re-post what I put there for my thoughts on the topic:
A guy is walking through a rough neighbourhood waving a wad of cash around, and he gets mugged.
Now, obviously the one who mugged the guy is in the wrong 100%. That was illegal, and he should be punished.
And the guy should have the right to wave around money as much as he wants without fear of being attacked and robbed. But it's a naive and dangerous game to play. Ideally, I should be able to leave my doors unlocked, my keys in my car, and my money on my counter. But it's asking for trouble if I do any of those things.
Again, not my fault if someone robs me. I have the right to leave my door unlocked, my money out, and my keys in my car. But, at the risk of sounding redundant, it's dangerously naive to do any of those things.
The_root_of_all_evil said:
To be brutally honest, I don't think rapists choose their victims based entirely on their clothes, do you?
They prey on the vulnerable members of society.
Absorb these posts. There is much truth in them.
In my own post on this subject when it was first rolled out, I shared some similar sentiments to the effect that (paraphrasing):
"How the victim (of rape) dresses is a factor that takes a back seat to factors such as opportunity, environment, uninhibited sense of impunity, etc."
We can all agree that people
SHOULD be free to dress and go where they wish, when they wish without fear of assault, mugging, rape, murder etc.
However
We can all also agree, if we're being honest, that the world is not safe and caution is a virtue when you know there to be danger. That the danger
SHOULD not
EXIST is a reasonable desire, but I don't believe going to war over a single, prejorative word will make any significant difference in decreasing sexual criminal's behavior (rape) in society.