Smoking?

Recommended Videos

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,305
0
0
Zer0 Zeal said:
Miumaru said:
Zer0 Zeal said:
I gotta say, im pretty offended by the question "How can you live with yourselves?"

Why honestly, does everyone care so much about people smoking? Studies show that second hand smoke does not harm anyone, the only reason that people think so is because of smear campaigns against the tobacco industry.

That said, I'm only a party smoker. I'll do it occasionally but wont go out to buy cigarettes or anything. I just stinge off other people. Someone before me got it absolutely right; moderation is the answer.
I didnt know Malboro put out studies. People think second hand smoke causes damage because of the damage caused by second hand smoke. Also you have no right to be offended because you have a bad habit that harms others. If smoking did nto harm anyone but yourself, then fine, but it doesnt.
http://knol.google.com/k/second-hand-smoke#

While it's not exactly a credible source, it pretty much lays down all the fine points that are accurate. I'm in a rush to go out somewhere so I havent had time to go get all the sources i read initially, but the one that started my change in views was watching an episode of "Penn and Teller: Bullshit". I don't know if you're familiar with the show but it presents hard evidence against the second hand smoking studies. Penn and Teller abstain from smoking anyway and still present this stuff.

I'm not saying that smokings good for you, im just saying that people are overly concerned about something thats not harmful anyway (im refering to second hand smoke here of course) -- SMEAR CAMPAIGNS PEOPLE.

EDIT: if you want me to find the sources, PM me and when i get back from going out ill send them your way.
If it's that harmless, then why do my lungs fill with mucous and I have to be rushed to a hospital whenever some jerk blows smoke in my face?

Oh right, I'm asthmatic. But it's clearly all in my head, because Penn and Teller say second hand smoke is harmless.

Actually, I find Penn and Teller to be extremely biased and often outright inaccurate.

EDIT: Also, my friend's grandma worked in a restaurant that encouraged smoking, although she never smoked herself. She died of emphysema. So... yeah. Reality overrules studies, you know.
 

oktalist

New member
Feb 16, 2009
1,603
0
0
Even though I have quit smoking (which was easy for me, by the way) I will answer this as if I hadn't.

1. I can take it or leave it. It performs a valuable function in my life. I'm only smoking two or three per day (or six, depending on how far you go back in my life).
2. Headrush. I was already hitting the weed pretty hard, and the cigarettes were just filling the space during a shortage.
3. Yes. I coughed up a lung.
 

YouCallMeNighthawk

New member
Mar 8, 2010
722
0
0
Lawyer105 said:
YouCallMeNighthawk said:
I'll put it again but more clearer.

So WHEN you start driving i can throw bowls of puke over you 3 times a day, as you are poisoning my air? fair play mate i look forward to that day :D
Original post clarified... And your argument is just as flawed as Spinozaad's. You smokers CREATE the problem (see revised post - I'm not typing it again). Public urination is also considered unacceptable by a significant majority of people, and nobody tries to assert their 'right' to pee in public!
yeah your earlier post saying that the pollution from cars has it's benefits, yes, but so does smoking. All the taxes we pay for our cigarettes pay for stuff aswel, so without smokers governments will have alot less money to spend on emergency services and so on.
 

thenoblitt

New member
May 7, 2009
759
0
0
1. smoked once tasted bad and just didnt really like the feeling, i do love the smell of second hand smoke though, damn my aunt for smoking around me as a kid

2.same as 1

3.never had a cigar but they look damn fancy
 

Frankydee

New member
Mar 25, 2009
1,137
0
0
1.Didn't really bother me. Shame wasn't something particularly on my mind when I did smoke.
2.Again, didn't really care. Thought about it but then remembered that I hadn't really planned on living past 30 anyway.
3.Really really high. Or lightheaded.
4.Yes and they're okay I suppose. I smoked the cheap, flavored sort.
 

Levitas1234

New member
Oct 28, 2009
1,016
0
0
^=ash=^ said:
3. No. It's about the image.
actually i enjoy smoking a flavored cigar more than a cigarette especially for after toke.

1. I don't really care to be honest, i try to eat healthy and stay active.
2. first time i tried, just like you op i thought it was disgusting i stayed away from smoking for a long time.
3. Cigars are flavored :3 i have a pack of colts sweets that i bought instead of smokes today because i like variety or some shit


 

Plurralbles

New member
Jan 12, 2010
4,611
0
0
YouCallMeNighthawk said:
Lawyer105 said:
YouCallMeNighthawk said:
I'll put it again but more clearer.

So WHEN you start driving i can throw bowls of puke over you 3 times a day, as you are poisoning my air? fair play mate i look forward to that day :D
Original post clarified... And your argument is just as flawed as Spinozaad's. You smokers CREATE the problem (see revised post - I'm not typing it again). Public urination is also considered unacceptable by a significant majority of people, and nobody tries to assert their 'right' to pee in public!
yeah your earlier post saying that the pollution from cars has it's benefits, yes, but so does smoking. All the taxes we pay for our cigarettes pay for stuff aswel, so without smokers governments will have alot less money to spend on emergency services and so on.
it's commonly said that the savings in healthcare would overcome the collective money made from taxes, jobs, pretty much everything regarding smoking. That's the fault of healthcare artificially made to be expensive for no reason though so a lot of people disregard this.
 

Bored Tomatoe

New member
Aug 15, 2008
3,619
0
0
1. I'm aware smoking is generally bad for my health... then again, I'm a teenager and long term consequences are difficult to put into context with my current reasoning skills, so there's your honest answer.

2. The first time I had a cigar, I actually had a rather pleasant buzz, however, my first Cigarette made me pretty dizzy and nauseous.

3. Yep, I've tried one. For the special part, they can taste really nice if you've got a good cigar. Other than that, I don't know...
 
Apr 29, 2010
4,148
0
0
1. I know it's dangerous to one's health. Everyone knows this. But, if someone wants to smoke, I say let them. It's their choice.
2. I remember coughing the first time I tried smoking. It was also the last time.
3. Actually, the first time I tried smoking was with a cigar.
 

Miumaru

New member
May 5, 2010
1,765
0
0
Spinozaad said:
Miumaru said:
Well, I never had to sit in a room full of car exhaust for one, and certainly I am all for cleaning up its bad effects too.
Sure, but unless you're out living in the middle of nowhere, you're constantly breathing in toxic fumes. If you're living in the city, it's quite possible that you're doing so right now.

However smokers do not provide ANY positive service such as transportation...
The act of smoking does not provide a positive effect, but smokers not doing anything positive? Carefully phrase your wordings, my friend. Transportation can also be provided through trains or bicycles. Cars, with their exhaust fumes and statistical tendency to kill people dead are unnecessary on their own as well.

...and certainly it would be easier to remove all smoking with positive effect than all cars. People would have more money to spend for one.
That last argument makes absolutely no sense at all. People don't have 'more money to spend'. They have the same amount of money, just less choice to spend it on. An institution that would have less money if smoking were to stop, would be the government. And trust me that the government would find another way to get that money.

Perhaps a tax on videogames. AFterall, when you're playing videogames, you are not contributing to society.
The act of smoking does nothing positive. If someone who smokes IS helping society, then that just helps my side since smoking will remove them sooner than later which would be bad.
If you stopped buying something you buy regularly, you can use that money for other things. And from what my mom says, smoking aint cheap.
My playing video games is not killing anyone beyond the goblins and taliban parodies of their virtual worlds.
 

Miumaru

New member
May 5, 2010
1,765
0
0
SODAssault said:
1.How can you live with yourself?
That's an awfully pissy way to ask. I don't smoke anymore, but this kind of feigned self-righteous indignation makes me want to start again purely out of spite.

2.How did you feel the first time you tried?
It felt good. Manly, even.

3.Ever tried a cigar?What's so special about it?
Cigars are fine. Much better-quality smoke. They're special because they're pure, hand-rolled tobacco, as opposed to the processed crap that gets crammed into cigarettes.

Miumaru said:
I dunno, smokers who dont give a crap have a huge pole up there ass that gets shoved into other's lungs. I realize some smokers are regretful about it and want to quit, and I feel bad for them. Those who dont give a crap or feel opressed however, are pathetic in their murderious ways.
Tell me, what is it about you that's so special and entitles you to be so openly condescending?
My damaged lungs from poor parenting. I do not condescend in a way to suggest only I can. If others wish to condescend with me, then sure. If it bothers you so much, could always quit smoking. Id even give you a back pat.
 

Miumaru

New member
May 5, 2010
1,765
0
0
Aerodyamic said:
Miumaru said:
"Self-righteous snivelling and pointless aggression"
You've know told us that you'd love to see fewer cars on the road, but how do you feel about the roof on your house? I'm going to take a wild guess, and say that the roofing product is petroleum-based, and had to be shipped by truck from the manufacturer, after being made in a plant, before which the raw materials were extracted either from a sea-bed deposit, or the oil-sands. So, what's more important, the shelter over your head, or the environmental damage caused by every step of the process that created that roof?

Now could you do us smokers a favour: take your complaining about people that CHOOSE to smoke outside and shove it someplace as appropriate as we'd like to shove your pretentious, self-important soap-boxing? I'll choose to smoke, and you can choose to be a grumpy, stuck-up bint, and keep the hell away from me.

Lawyer105 said:
2) I propose that all non-smokers start carrying water pistols with red food colouring in 'em. If we have to live with the annoyance of breathing smelly smoke by-products, the smokers can live with the annoyance of wearing food colouring. Seems reasonable to me. :D
If you shoot at me with food colouring, I reserve the right to claim you've assaulted me, and defend myself.



BRING IT.

OT:

1: I smoke because it has a relaxing effect, and because I'm an industrial roofer; I inhale as much (if not more) tar during most days at work as I do smoking over the course of the same day.
2. Little bit of a buzz. Sometimes I still get one.
3. They have a different, richer flavour, and smoke slower, so it's more about enjoying the taste and the socialization, when you smoke a cigar or pipe.
Your paraphrasing of my post just makes me label you a jerk in my mind and shall otherwise ignore your certainly as rude action.
 

similar.squirrel

New member
Mar 28, 2009
6,020
0
0
1.I can't, really. It's a pretty shameful habit, and I hate myself for it. The addictive properties are currently overriding my willpower.

2.It depends. Sometimes paranoid, nihilistic at other times.

3.It tasted like mushrooms. So..Puzzled, I guess.

4.I have. It's nothing special. Makes you feel like Clint Eastwood, I guess. That's got to count for something.
 

Miumaru

New member
May 5, 2010
1,765
0
0
SODAssault said:
Miumaru said:
The axeman snippeth.
If you actually read my post, you'd realize that I've already quit. I just don't take kindly to people with an unwarranted superiority complex.
Well, I have a legion of pro smokers at my throat, so Ive been rushing a bit.

I too dont take kindly to such. I do not hate smokers, I hate smoking. Smokers who have no remorse for their actions however, I hate. The first person I replied to I believe was one such person, and that really irks me.
 

garfoldsomeoneelse

Charming, But Stupid
Mar 22, 2009
2,908
0
0
Miumaru said:
The axeman snippeth yet again.
And inversely, most smokers take a hostile attitude to such criticisms because they're tired of taking shit for a habit they're generally quite considerate about. Most people here smoke outdoors, or in their own vehicles when alone/with consenting passengers, but take the stance of "fuck you, I'll do whatever I want" because they're tired of explaining their personal choices to condescending people.

So your parents were inconsiderate. I've had significant problems within my own family due to alcoholism, but I never go out of my way to sling mud at people that enjoy the occasional drink; and if I did, they'd probably react to me the same way that the smokers here are getting up in arms over your comments.
 

Spinozaad

New member
Jun 16, 2008
1,106
0
0
Marmooset said:
Still, likewise I find you more reasonable than other opponents on this issue, as you seem more consistent. I believe we differ more that you are more lenient to both while I'm more strict. I can respect that.
Well, I fully understand and support a ban in public buildings. I also understand and support a ban in restaurants and hotels. I don't support a ban in bars, pubs and cafés, however. But that's a different discussion.

It's just when the anti-smoking front goes berserk on smoking in general, that I feel I must defend "my" cause. To be honest, we live in a free society. And standing next to some smoker in the streets isn't going to kill you any faster than walking down an urban center. Live and let live, which includes the occasional 'suck it up', if you catch my drift.

Lawyer105 said:
Your argument is flawed... that's like saying "I'm going to set your house on fire because you called the cops when I broke into it." If you CREATE the problem, you're hardly at liberty to get annoyed when people want the problem to go away.
Oh, it definately is. Just as the argument I fixed was flawed as well. The point is not if there's 'an added benefit'. That's just a red herring applied to confuse the subject. The subject is that certain non-smokers do not want to inhale toxins found in smoke. These toxins are also found in exhaust fumes. The cars, whether or not they supply your gatorade, are just as much 'mercyless killers' or any other hyperbole of choice as those who smoke a cigarette, and who's smoke you might inhale slightly from time to time.

Honestly, I don't give a rat's ass that you think that smokers are murderers, although horribly inefficient ones. Just admit that the cars, planes and factories. In fact, society in general is "trying" (it isn't) to kill you with its toxic fumes. That's all I want to here.

You see? I'm not even denying that second hand smoke is not healthy. Although I am doubting it's the vicious killer the stuck up anti-smokers make it out to be.
 

Miumaru

New member
May 5, 2010
1,765
0
0
SODAssault said:
Miumaru said:
The axeman snippeth yet again.
And inversely, most smokers take a hostile attitude to such criticisms because they're tired of taking shit for a habit they're generally quite considerate about. Most people here smoke outdoors, or in their own vehicles when alone/with consenting passengers, but take the stance of "fuck you, I'll do whatever I want" because they're tired of explaining their personal choices to condescending people.

So your parents were inconsiderate. I've had significant problems within my own family due to alcoholism, but I never go out of my way to sling mud at people that enjoy the occasional drink; and if I did, they'd probably react to me the same way that the smokers here are getting up in arms over your comments.
Ill care when they do. I am not so hostile to smokers I know want to quit, and show awareness of other humans, but I am quick to turn on people who show they do not care. If thats the case, then I will not feel bad for them, only superiority. Certainly if I was always covered in stink, I should not be surprised if people are bothered by it. If I do not like it, I should shower.
 

garfoldsomeoneelse

Charming, But Stupid
Mar 22, 2009
2,908
0
0
Miumaru said:
Snipping. Again.
You are really missing the point I was making, which is "people tend to get pissy and tell you to get stuffed when you give them attitude first". Like I said, most people here are likely to be very considerate and reasonable, but will go out of their way to spite you because they really don't like being talked down to anymore than anybody else does. Making sweeping generalizations like "all smokers are bad people that couldn't care less about others" certainly doesn't make you look like the reasonable one, either. In fact, I'd say your attitude is more in line with "fanatical, delusional Knight Templar that wants to exterminate everyone that doesn't agree with you."