Mimsofthedawg said:
DeSpiritusBellum said:
I wish you journalists/writers weren't so easy everytime someone felt like pulling a fast one for some free publicity.
The last one I read was that the NSA was using a cluster of PS3s to crack codes or cipher through some bandwidth or whatever, which is just as obviously bullshit. Sony for one has been pulling that stunt for the longest time now, and it's sad that the military and defence establishments don't have more sense than to whore themselves out like that.
There's a reason why snipers prefer bolt-action rifles - And that is because they're precise and RELIABLE due to their simplicity. Snipers are trained to never take any chance on anything within their control. You give a 3 year old an iPhone and it's gonna be broken within 2 hours tops, which means you basically don't want to take it into a warzone in any way, shape or form, since it is very much fallible. It's a great phone, but you don't want your effectiveness/life depending on it.
Add to that the fact that you already have all sorts of purpose-built trajectory calculators widely available, as well as the fact that most experienced snipers just do the maths in their heads, and make sure their rifles are zeroed before ever firing a shot in anger (It's only in computer games that you ever go outside the zero) and you have yourself one bullshit story.
Fair enough, it's funny if you don't know any better, and I should shrug it off instead of grumping about it, but you just take the bait every damn time, and you're really just providing these companies with free advertising based on stories that are misleading at best. The least you could do is charge them for it. Aren't you supposed to fact check this stuff?
1 year from now most people who read this story will forget about it. Why? Because it's irrelevent. I will not say whether or not this has actually been used, or even if it's practical (although, I'm sure an argument could be made in either case). What I will say is that this is a bit of comedy; a way in which to feel that our meaningless consumerism is good for something other than our fat and greedy hands. It shifts our gaze from our own pathetic apps (seriously? Who the fuck needs farmville on a phone? it's a damn phone!), and gives us a commradery with people who are using something we have for a better purpose. Lighten up and don't read so much into it. It's pretty fucking awesome that they COULD, even if they wouldn't. And frankly, that's what I hear the article saying - not so much that it's being used but more that the potential for its usage is great.
I don't disagree with any of you guys saying "Lighten up!" or "It's neat!", I thought of it myself as I was writing it, and it is cool, and it is neat and quirky when you look at it on it's own, and I am being a grumpy dude.
It's just that, as a major warhead, I take offence that something so blatantly bogus is so easy to get passed around the news circuit, because it isn't about doing cool stuff for the people behind it, or making people laugh and gadgetheads go "Ooo" - It's about snagging some free advertising and moving some product.
I think the guys behind this app are taking a bit of a cheap shot (I pun'd!) with or without Apples involvement, and quite possibly exploiting the fact that people don't know anything about war, except what they see in games and movies.
Sadly though, people really don't, and perhaps the saddest part is that the military doesn't seem to mind very much, because it makes war seem quirky and exciting, especially to a videogaming audience. It might be the greatest occupation in life for people who are truly cut out for it, but it definitely isn't a smooth ride for anyone. It's that exploitive trend that I find pretty uncomfortable, and I wish that journalists would at least be a bit more critical of it than their readers.
Apart from that, it definitely rocks. We should have way more tactical sims/games and gadgets if you ask me.