I'm pretty sure they did. I think I remember reading a Dredd story where he head to deal with some manner of marital dispute, though I can't recall any details.Odgical said:
Dredd deserves a better game than Injustice. Sad to say I don't think he'll ever get oneZZoMBiE13 said:
yes. But with 97% unemployment and population levels that could generously be called insane (one man dies simply by walking into a smoking area) civil cases are few and far between, if only because so much of the law we think of has been rescinded. For example, in one comic, a man comes to Mega-City 1 to become a renowned comic book writer and artist (a foolish dream, as all comics are written by robots, no one reads those haphazard human-produced ones anymore!) and shows his work to a major publisher. While his comic is OBVIOUSLY inferior to the comic-bot's work, they like it anyway, because, hey, maybe this laughably imperfect comic will sell better than the predictable comic-bot that audiences are growing tired of! So obviously, they want to take his work, stamp the comic-bot's name on it, and sell it.Odgical said:
Since 2005 they've been reprinting every Dredd story in 2 series called "The Complete Case Files" and "The Restricted Case Files".Probably a good place to start if you're interested in more Dreddy goodnessLink_to_Future said:
What's even weirder is that for the last 13 years 2000AD has been owned by Rebellion who are a video game developer and yet in that time all we've gotten is the rather mediocre Dredd vs Death(2003),the pretty good Rogue Trooper(2006) and the Dredd vs Zombies iOS game(2011).They have a ridiculous library of characters and stories to base games off of yet they don't seem to be doing anything with themLocutus9956 said:
I dunno what you're on about, INJUSTICE was great.8-Bit_Jack said:
injustice is a hamfisted fighter with serious balance issues and awful animation. That's par for the course as far as Netherrealms is concerned, but even if it's the best they've ever done, it still isn't particularly GOOD.ZZoMBiE13 said:
why do you disagree? It's demonstrable.ZZoMBiE13 said:
I just didn't find the game balance to be a problem. The spams are usually beatable and I kinda feel like it's on the player to beat people who try that rather than up to the company to weaken every move that one person abuses. A few moves were overpowered when the game first came out, but everything has a counter. At least in my experience. You can't go nerfing every thing a player abuses, it's up to the community to find what works and what doesn't and to punish the Superman spammers of the world. I think it's easy to cry "UNBALANCED", I think it's more challenging and rewarding to let the spammers try to zone while I close in and beat them anyway.8-Bit_Jack said:
See, i'm right there with you: i play fighting games for the fun of simple violence. The problem is I attend a college almost wholly populated by tourneyfags, so I DO have to deal with the shitheel behavior that comes with that crowd. I never said Injustice was BAD, it just isn't as great as people say.ZZoMBiE13 said:I just didn't find the game balance to be a problem. The spams are usually beatable and I kinda feel like it's on the player to beat people who try that rather than up to the company to weaken every move that one person abuses. A few moves were overpowered when the game first came out, but everything has a counter. At least in my experience. You can't go nerfing every thing a player abuses, it's up to the community to find what works and what doesn't and to punish the Superman spammers of the world. I think it's easy to cry "UNBALANCED", I think it's more challenging and rewarding to let the spammers try to zone while I close in and beat them anyway.
As for the movement of the characters, I also think you're being hyper critical of the animations. They may not be the best thing ever put out, but they're serviceable. And more to the point, the second to second gameplay is what matters most in a fighter. INJUSTICE had that down pretty well. As for "manfaced" women, I honestly couldn't care less so long as I enjoy the gameplay. They could be stick figures for all I care so long as the game plays well.
In the interest of transparency, I'm not some huge Fighter Game enthusiast. So there may be things I'm unaware of as far as tournament level stuff goes. I watched a few EVO matches and played the game for a few weeks. But I liked what I played and I can only speak to my personal experience in response to your question. I guess the simpler answer would have been to just say "I enjoyed it", but I don't like to come off as lazy.
As for DREDD, I do agree with what you're saying there. I'd love a good DREDD shooter or maybe even a MEGA CITY ONE open-world game. That could be pretty amazing if the right team got behind it. Here's hoping, right?
8-Bit_Jack said:
If the game had been balanced in the first version, things wouldn't have needed to be changed. Superman might be easier to deal with now, but for a good while he was almost impossible to deal with. Graphics being "irrelevant" is you making an excuse for what you perceive as an attack on your ability to enjoy the game freely. Which is stupid. whether the graphics matter is ITSELF irrelevant, because the initial claim was that the game was ugly, and you stated you disagreed. I'm not trying to hold you to any sort of standardized debate rules, i'm merely asking you to understand the language you are using to waste time talking about Batman VS Superman Punchies: The Game.ZZoMBiE13 said:
