Moonlight Butterfly said:
Just because things are sexist to make profits doesn't mean they are any less sexist... One would argue that making content sexist is exclusionary to the core gameplay. That itself is something I take umbrage with.
That said I have no idea why men have a problem with better female characters.
Better is relative. For some men better female characters are characters with less clothes and big tits. So by their standards a lot of games are giving good female characters.
Secondly, you can't expect developers to just make characters better. It comes at a cost, dev time to be more precise. As such better female characters will come at the detriment of male characters or other things. It's not a win-win it's a tradeoff. It's like how everyone likes better graphics but don't want devs to invest too much in graphics because they know in one way or an other it will back fire (less investment in gameplay, story, etc.)
And remember how my quote was that if feminists were only about equal treatment that they overstepped their boundaries by attacking the gaming industry. Whether or not the environment in the games are sexist because of whatever reason is irrelevant. Because the industry does not treat female players differently because they are female. And the way characters are treated would only be relevant if we start considering gaming characters to be real persons.
It's a chicken and and egg situation devs make games sexist, intentionally or not, and women are then put off by it and so they don't play the game and so devs make sexist games.
That is an assumption without any evidence. Make a market study, go ask women who don't play games why they don't and see if "the games are sexist" reason comes out in a spontaneous manner on such a scale that it is indeed the fault of devs that the male player-base is that much bigger.
Only way they are going to break that is by making better female characters, the onus is on them because if we support sexist games then they will think we are okay with it...
See above
I play games and love them but I still recognize there is room for improvement and indeed more characters like Elizabeth and Lara would be welcome and look they aren't hideous man women you think feminists want to force on you. Who would have thunk huh.
I have never stated feminists wanted to shove hideous man women on our faces. That was a mere assumption on your part. And fyi i'm one of those who dislikes bikini armor in RPG's and other silly useless oversexualization of women. But not because it's some kind of anti-women move but because it's silly, absurd and usually isn't consistent with other elements of the game. (if females can be fully protected by a bikini than why as a male would i wear bulky armor which covers my entire body?)
Imagine if you loved games but lived in a world where 90% of games were aimed at women. Would you like that? Would you complain? Would you enjoy Loki in just his pants?
These are questions you need to ask yourself.
No. Yes. No. But unlike feminists I wouldn't use underhanded tactics by bringing in social issues and just state: i don't like it. Which is what I do when i complain about the easiness of games nowadays. You assume i'm angry about the complaining. I'm not. I'm disgusted by how the complaining is done and trying to guilt people to such a point they feel they have to conform or feel like misogynistic pigs is just wrong.