endnuen said:
Roman Monaghan said:
NameIsRobertPaulson said:
Roman Monaghan said:
My thoughts are I feel like the only person in the world who fucking hates this game.
Someone please enlighten me on why so many people are pretending it's not a huge waste. It feels like Crackdown all over again.
Cause opinions man.
For a longer answer: Platinum makes great games in this genre, it doesn't affect Metal Gear Solid canon in any way, and the gameplay thus far has been really fun. Those are the three reasons I hear most.
Yeah hasn't ruined the canon in any way except totally missing the point about how Raiden is supposed to be a metaphorical representation of the player in the game. It's like, Raiden sucks, because you the person playing the game sucks. That was kinda the whole sub text of MGS 2. Then in MGS 4 he was metaphorical of the most bland superficial elements of the series that people like while totally missing the sub text.
In fact that kinda sums up Revengaence to me perfectly. Bland superficial elements of the series that people like while totally missing the point. It's like bad fan fiction. "AND I HATE ROSE SO SHE'S NOT IN THE GAME! AND THEN HE GETS A PET ROBOT DOG! AND THEN HE HAS A SUPER POWERED EVIL SIDE!!!"
The story blows ass and the gameplay isn't as good as Bayonetta, so what exactly justifies this games existence again?
You do know the story is Hideo Kojimas own? He wrote rising and just left platinum with the gameplay.
Raiden is just as Hideo wants him to be, and his "evil side" is actually brought up in MGS2 if I recall.
Okay, no it isn't. I'm sick of people fucking saying that like it excuses anything, because it isn't fucking true, and it doesn't fucking matter. Etsu Tamari wrote this game, not Kojima. He may have signed off on it, but that doesn't make it ok, we all remember Max Payne 3; it had approval from Sam Lake, but that didn't fix the fact the story was dog shit.
And furthermore, even if Kojima did write it, I fail to see how that'd excuse the stupid shit on display in this story. George Lucas wrote the prequel trilogies, we don't give those slack just because it was directly made by the 'father' of the franchise. When I see stupid shit, I don't care what asshole it sprang from, I'm still not eating it.
The "evil side" you're saying was brought up is a delusion you're creating to justify the garbage in this game. I'm not saying MGS 2 was perfect, in fact I think the game is unredeemable and not worth playing for many reasons, but the whole Raiden thing was awesome on a pure troll level. His past as a child soldier is brought up with the references and implications of child soliders in real life who are drugged to be pavlovianly conditioned to find pleasure in killing, associating the high of the drugs with the reward of killing an enemy. Raiden didn't have a bullshit "evil side", he enjoyed killing because he was trained to, because he still felt the rush of crack hitting his brain when he spilled an enemys blood, his mind no longer needing the actual substance of whatever they used to get that same high. Does this ever get brought up in Revengaence? No. Instead we get "
JACK THE RIPPER!." Inexcusable, brainless, fanfic levels of idiocy.
So the story sucks, and whatever excuse you might bring up to justify it doesn't change that. And the gameplay is nothing god damn special, just because it's P* people give it a free pass, but compared to Bayonetta, Anarchy Reigns, hell even Veautiful Joe, there's nothing substantial for this game to offer us. I don't get why fans like this game considering it's such a betrayal - story wise, and I don't get why people who don't care like it for the gameplay when the gameplay is sub par and utterly fails to hold up against its forebears and competitors.