I don't know, but there better be a wicked sweet end boss for how long it's taken us to get through.
Sorry the importance of end bosses as a gamin experience may have been phased out was being discussed in an article X DProject_Xii said:I don't know, but there better be a wicked sweet end boss for how long it's taken us to get through.
this, always and forever...Mithol said:As long as humans have free will people will die because of their opinions. Sad really, but this has always happened, only in the last 10 years its got the media fanfare to accompany it.
The war on terror is an illusion. You can't fight terrorism and geurillas because the collateral damage creates new enemies faster than you can kill them. Hell, just killing the right people will often convert their friends and family to the cause. Beyond that, the occupation itself is probably creating enemies, and we haven't changed the policies that created terrorists in the middle east. We still interfere in their politics for our own good to their detriment, so of course they will continue to want us to stop. and some of them will be willing to kill and die to make us.Manji187 said:It's been almost 10 years since 9/11, Osama bin Laden is dead...like so many other Al Qaeda/ Taliban insurgents. Is the end in sight? How does the end even look like?
Even if you kill every single Al Qaeda/ Taliban operative and their financial backers...the pain and sorrow of 10 years of atrocities (Abu Ghraib/ Guantanamo Bay) and incidents (infamous collateral damage) could possibly inspire a new generation. What is the U.S. gonna do...wipe entire nations of the map...women and children included?
Will the War on Terror end when every single "rogue state" will be a liberal democracy with free market capitalism for ideology and a U.S. base on its territory? What are the chances of that?
Or will it end with the downfall of the U.S. economy (national debt over 14 trillion and counting and the upcoming Medicare/ Medicaid trouble)? Isn't the U.S. technically bankrupt?
Or is there another way?
Or....will it continue indefinitely? Like in the saying "Eternal war for eternal peace"...basically meaning that there never will be peace.
The reason you don't hear about successful campaigns against insurgents is because victory isn't achieved by big newsworthy conflict, but by careful economic and social reform that doesn't interest the general public.spartan231490 said:I don't understand why anyone thinks we will win. Napoleon couldn't do it in Spain, we couldn't do it in Korea, the British couldn't do it in America. I am not aware of any time when an insurgency has completely been irradicated by the occupying force. It's a pretty good bet that the American government is well aware of that and has no intent to ever "win" the war on terror, but that the war on terror is actually a cover for some other agenda.
If you read my whole post(I'm sure you did, I'm just pointing it out for people who read this post and not my last one), you will notice that I say kinda the same thing. I say that you can't beat an insurgency with military force, but I also say that the war on terror will never end because the US policies that lead to terrorism in the first place are still in place, which is exactly what you said, just from another angle.thaluikhain said:The reason you don't hear about successful campaigns against insurgents is because victory isn't achieved by big newsworthy conflict, but by careful economic and social reform that doesn't interest the general public.spartan231490 said:I don't understand why anyone thinks we will win. Napoleon couldn't do it in Spain, we couldn't do it in Korea, the British couldn't do it in America. I am not aware of any time when an insurgency has completely been irradicated by the occupying force. It's a pretty good bet that the American government is well aware of that and has no intent to ever "win" the war on terror, but that the war on terror is actually a cover for some other agenda.
You don't fight insurgency, any more than you fight religion or other ideas. You take away the social factors that make it worth fighting about.
This runs contrary to most popular notions of warfare (if you call the enemy a military force) or justice (if you call them criminals), though, so it's not palatable. It's also time consuming and makes your much loved fancy toys fairly irrelevant.
About US policies, though, it doesn't help that there are any number of important power groups involved, each playing their own game. It only takes one of them to cause a disaster on their own, or by interfering in something vital someone else is doing.spartan231490 said:If you read my whole post(I'm sure you did, I'm just pointing it out for people who read this post and not my last one), you will notice that I say kinda the same thing. I say that you can't beat an insurgency with military force, but I also say that the war on terror will never end because the US policies that lead to terrorism in the first place are still in place, which is exactly what you said, just from another angle.
Well, the Roman Empire seemed to be fairly good at preventing that sort of thing. You have noteworthy exceptions...Boudica and the Iceni come to mind, but they had been loyal Romanised Britains for some time up until then.spartan231490 said:Also, I wasn't just talking about modern times, I was talking about historically, where newsworthy has very little to do with it. Admittedly, history doesn't have very much to do with it either.
the war on terror ends when someone kills Diablo in Diablo 3 on hardest difficulty. the Lord of Terror will be destroyed once and for all.Manji187 said:It's been almost 10 years since 9/11, Osama bin Laden is dead...like so many other Al Qaeda/ Taliban insurgents. Is the end in sight? How does the end even look like?
Even if you kill every single Al Qaeda/ Taliban operative and their financial backers...the pain and sorrow of 10 years of atrocities (Abu Ghraib/ Guantanamo Bay) and incidents (infamous collateral damage) could possibly inspire a new generation. What is the U.S. gonna do...wipe entire nations of the map...women and children included?
Will the War on Terror end when every single "rogue state" will be a liberal democracy with free market capitalism for ideology and a U.S. base on its territory? What are the chances of that?
Or will it end with the downfall of the U.S. economy (national debt over 14 trillion and counting and the upcoming Medicare/ Medicaid trouble)? Isn't the U.S. technically bankrupt?
Or is there another way?
Or....will it continue indefinitely? Like in the saying "Eternal war for eternal peace"...basically meaning that there never will be peace.