Some Gaming Commandments

Recommended Videos

BloatedGuppy

New member
Feb 3, 2010
9,569
0
0
I feel like issuing some proclamations today. Not that any of these are likely to ever come true, but issuing more realistic proclamations like "I shall purchase a sandwich" or "Today I shall visit the bathroom thrice" lack the heft and import to make for interesting reading. So I will pretend, for a second, that the gaming industry has the slightest interest in doing things I actually want them to do, and make a list of haughty demands. Do feel free to add your own.

[HEADING=3]THOU SHALT STOP CONFUSING STREAMLINING WITH SHALLOWNESS[/HEADING]

And this goes for all of you, too. Streamlining doesn't have to be a dirty word. Feature creep can actually be a serious problem, and sometimes the best games are simple games. Archon was simple. Peggle is simple. Chess is simple. However, simpleness is only special when it conceals great depth. When all you're doing is cutting features and calling it streamlining, no one is fooled. Stop trying to fool us we are not fooled.

[HEADING=3]THOU SHALT GIVE US DLC WORTH BUYING[/HEADING]

I don't even mind DLC. If I like your game enough, I will throw my money at the screen. But there's no need to be INSULTING about it. What's this, EA? You want to sell me a hat for Sims 3? And it costs a dollar? That's fucking ridiculous. I could buy a real hat for a dollar. I might never want to be seen in it, but I could panhandle with it, and use that money to buy a better hat. Can I do that with your stupid virtual hat? No I cannot. Give us real DLC you monsters.

[HEADING=3]THOU SHALT GIVE US BETTER EXTRAS IN OUR COLLECTORS EDITIONS[/HEADING]

I don't know about all of you, but I'm tired of the tchotchkes they keep pawning off on the Collector's Edition crowd. You're already taking advantage of nerds with more money than sense by pricing the thing at $150, you can at least throw in a beefy manual and a nice cloth map or something. There are only so many gaming posters and action figures you can have around before your chance of ever having sex again falls below zero. A cloth map looks sophisticated. "What is this a map of? Are you some kind of explorer?" your date will ask, and you will silence her with a kiss.

[HEADING=3]THOU SHALT REALIZE THAT CHALLENGE CAN BE REWARDING[/HEADING]

Specifically, a sweet spot for challenge can be rewarding. No one seems to be tuning their difficulty any more. It's either insultingly easy, or ball crushingly hard. A little challenge can be a good thing. People like to feel like they're overcoming challenges to accomplish their goals. It helps soothe their guilty conscience about all the challenges they've failed to overcome in their actual lives, like the PHD they never got, or bathing.

[HEADING=3]BY THE SAME TOKEN, THOU SHALT REALIZE THAT GAMES CAN BE MORE THAN JUST CHALLENGES[/HEADING]

We don't have enough sandbox games, and the gaming community at large needs to stop sneering at the sandbox games we do have, because some of them are really excellent. Sometimes just mucking about in a virtual space can be enormously engaging. There's nothing wrong with giving gamers basic tools, and letting their imaginations do the rest. Minecraft is probably the best example of this, but even the Elder Scrolls games are a kind of sandbox, and of course you have the Sims.


[HEADING=3]THOU SHALT STOP FORSAKING TURN BASED STRATEGY[/HEADING]

I get that we all have a patience issue these days. Years of television commercials and microwave ovens have ruined us. If people aren't bunny hopping all over the screen in every direction, we're thumping our monitors, sure that the application has crashed. But we're really missing out on something special. Some of the best games of ALL TIME are stately and turn based. They let you breathe, let you think. They exercise something other than your wrist muscles, which, let's face it, are probably close to collapse from a life time of abuse anyway. Yet look what we're getting. A real time Jagged Alliance? A FPS shooter X-Com? Developers, politely go fuck yourselves, and come back with proper games.

Firaxis, Paradox, we're good. I have no problem with either of you. Have a slice of pie.

[HEADING=3]THOU SHALT RECOGNIZE THAT NOT EVERYTHING NEEDS TO BE TURNED INTO A FUCKING SHOOTER[/HEADING]

An addendum to the last commandment. Enough of this bullshit! I like shooting men as well, and as certain legal complications force me from doing it in real life, I'm forced to turn to virtual environments just like the rest of you. But what idiot took X-Com and Syndicate and thought "This could be greatly improved if there was more running and shooting"? Shooter fans get a new Call of Battlefields every 25 seconds. Give the rest of us some time at bat, you greedy pricks.

[HEADING=3]THOU SHALT RESPECT THE PAST[/HEADING]

EA, this one is for you. Where's System Shock 3, EA? Where's Wing Commander? What's this Lords of Ultima crap? You have a lot to answer for, EA. Stop murdering classic franchises. Not everyone loves Eidos Montreal, but at least they're trying. Give me Ultima X. You can even let that head case Garriott do it, if he's not too busy banging around in his castle, playing with his secret doors. Just call him up and hand him a blank cheque. You owe it to me. The only reason George Lucas didn't ruin my childhood is because you got there first.

[HEADING=3]THOU SHALT STOP HYPING YOUR GAMES FIVE YEARS BEFORE YOU'VE EVEN ENTERED BETA[/HEADING]

Seriously, enough. Diablo what? It's been 73 years Blizzard. We will have flying cars and a city on the moon before the games we see in today's trailers actually come to market. Hype has a life cycle, you can't just keep stacking it up forever.

Except you, Arena.net. Keep stoking those Guild Wars 2 flames, I'm buying whatever you're selling, you glorious bastards.

[HEADING=3]THOU SHALT STOP PANDERING TO THE LOWEST COMMON DENOMINATOR[/HEADING]

It feels like that article that came out revealing that the average gamer is now in their thirties was ages ago. Surely we're all in our 50's by now, which means we're incontinent and unemployable and thus have more time for gaming than ever before. Whatever the case, when is the industry going to stop writing and marketing these goddam games for adults? I don't mean by adding more titties, either. We're already at maximum titty saturation. I mean when are we going to put aside the evil galaxy destroying robots and orc invasions and grow this medium up a little bit? It's sad when the most intelligent, sophisticated, adult game of the year looks like it came out in 1985, because the major developers are still aiming directly at the pleasure centers of 12 year old boys.

 

BloatedGuppy

New member
Feb 3, 2010
9,569
0
0
Matthew94 said:
I feel sorry you took the time to write things that most people already know.

The only thing worth taking from that is the current state of DLC needs to be fixed, we need more "expansion" like DLC.
Friend, I am at work. If you understand how boring lulls at work can be, you will understand why this was the height of excitement by comparison.

I don't even need expansions, to be honest. I remember too many bad expansions to be nostalgic about the expansion pack experience. I just need the DLC we're getting to be...better, somehow.
 

Fappy

\[T]/
Jan 4, 2010
12,010
0
41
Country
United States
I like how one commandment has "fuck" in it. Makes Gamer-God sound like a hardcore BAMF. Anyway about that streamlining bit... I don't find it to be a dirty word, but sometimes games take it too far in sequels.
 

BloatedGuppy

New member
Feb 3, 2010
9,569
0
0
Lagao said:
Thou shall never lose, and if thou hast died, it was hacks or screen looking.
Thou shall not speak on a mic until your voice is stable.
Thou shall teamstack, so that you seem better.
Those are excellent Gamer Commandments. Would make for a far snarkier OP. I should do that next time.
 

Weaver

Overcaffeinated
Apr 28, 2008
8,976
0
0
This was a fun read. Thanks for typing it up, Guppy!
(I'm also at work _>)
 

Zhukov

The Laughing Arsehole
Dec 29, 2009
13,757
5
43
Have I ever mentioned that your posts are a pleasure to read?

Well, I have now.

EDIT: Oh, and in the spirit of the thread...

Thou shalt make thy cutscenes skippable place a checkpoint after each one.
 

DustyDrB

Made of ticky tacky
Jan 19, 2010
8,361
3
43
Zhukov said:
Have I ever mentioned that your posts are a pleasure to read?

Well, I have now.
Lists like this just hit the pleasure center in my brain somehow.

My commandments have more to do with actual gameplay, like...

If your game has platforming, you better give me control of the camera. This is why I will never replay the God of War games.

Then there are the The Collectable Doodad Commandments [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/comics/critical-miss/8230-The-Collectable-Doodad-Commandments]. I love Enslaved, but man it got so much wrong there.
 

boag

New member
Sep 13, 2010
1,623
0
0
BloatedGuppy said:
I feel like issuing some proclamations today. Not that any of these are likely to ever come true, but issuing more realistic proclamations like "I shall purchase a sandwich" or "Today I shall visit the bathroom thrice" lack the heft and import to make for interesting reading. So I will pretend, for a second, that the gaming industry has the slightest interest in doing things I actually want them to do, and make a list of haughty demands. Do feel free to add your own.

[HEADING=3]THOU SHALT STOP CONFUSING STREAMLINING WITH SHALLOWNESS[/HEADING]

And this goes for all of you, too. Streamlining doesn't have to be a dirty word. Feature creep can actually be a serious problem, and sometimes the best games are simple games. Archon was simple. Peggle is simple. Chess is simple. However, simpleness is only special when it conceals great depth. When all you're doing is cutting features and calling it streamlining, no one is fooled. Stop trying to fool us we are not fooled.

[HEADING=3]THOU SHALT GIVE US DLC WORTH BUYING[/HEADING]

I don't even mind DLC. If I like your game enough, I will throw my money at the screen. But there's no need to be INSULTING about it. What's this, EA? You want to sell me a hat for Sims 3? And it costs a dollar? That's fucking ridiculous. I could buy a real hat for a dollar. I might never want to be seen in it, but I could panhandle with it, and use that money to buy a better hat. Can I do that with your stupid virtual hat? No I cannot. Give us real DLC you monsters.

[HEADING=3]THOU SHALT GIVE US BETTER EXTRAS IN OUR COLLECTORS EDITIONS[/HEADING]

I don't know about all of you, but I'm tired of the tchotchkes they keep pawning off on the Collector's Edition crowd. You're already taking advantage of nerds with more money than sense by pricing the thing at $150, you can at least throw in a beefy manual and a nice cloth map or something. There are only so many gaming posters and action figures you can have around before your chance of ever having sex again falls below zero. A cloth map looks sophisticated. "What is this a map of? Are you some kind of explorer?" your date will ask, and you will silence her with a kiss.

[HEADING=3]THOU SHALT REALIZE THAT CHALLENGE CAN BE REWARDING[/HEADING]

Specifically, a sweet spot for challenge can be rewarding. No one seems to be tuning their difficulty any more. It's either insultingly easy, or ball crushingly hard. A little challenge can be a good thing. People like to feel like they're overcoming challenges to accomplish their goals. It helps soothe their guilty conscience about all the challenges they've failed to overcome in their actual lives, like the PHD they never got, or bathing.

[HEADING=3]BY THE SAME TOKEN, THOU SHALT REALIZE THAT GAMES CAN BE MORE THAN JUST CHALLENGES[/HEADING]

We don't have enough sandbox games, and the gaming community at large needs to stop sneering at the sandbox games we do have, because some of them are really excellent. Sometimes just mucking about in a virtual space can be enormously engaging. There's nothing wrong with giving gamers basic tools, and letting their imaginations do the rest. Minecraft is probably the best example of this, but even the Elder Scrolls games are a kind of sandbox, and of course you have the Sims.


[HEADING=3]THOU SHALT STOP FORSAKING TURN BASED STRATEGY[/HEADING]

I get that we all have a patience issue these days. Years of television commercials and microwave ovens have ruined us. If people aren't bunny hopping all over the screen in every direction, we're thumping our monitors, sure that the application has crashed. But we're really missing out on something special. Some of the best games of ALL TIME are stately and turn based. They let you breathe, let you think. They exercise something other than your wrist muscles, which, let's face it, are probably close to collapse from a life time of abuse anyway. Yet look what we're getting. A real time Jagged Alliance? A FPS shooter X-Com? Developers, politely go fuck yourselves, and come back with proper games.

Firaxis, Paradox, we're good. I have no problem with either of you. Have a slice of pie.

[HEADING=3]THOU SHALT RECOGNIZE THAT NOT EVERYTHING NEEDS TO BE TURNED INTO A FUCKING SHOOTER[/HEADING]

An addendum to the last commandment. Enough of this bullshit! I like shooting men as well, and as certain legal complications force me from doing it in real life, I'm forced to turn to virtual environments just like the rest of you. But what idiot took X-Com and Syndicate and thought "This could be greatly improved if there was more running and shooting"? Shooter fans get a new Call of Battlefields every 25 seconds. Give the rest of us some time at bat, you greedy pricks.

[HEADING=3]THOU SHALT RESPECT THE PAST[/HEADING]

EA, this one is for you. Where's System Shock 3, EA? Where's Wing Commander? What's this Lords of Ultima crap? You have a lot to answer for, EA. Stop murdering classic franchises. Not everyone loves Eidos Montreal, but at least they're trying. Give me Ultima X. You can even let that head case Garriott do it, if he's not too busy banging around in his castle, playing with his secret doors. Just call him up and hand him a blank cheque. You owe it to me. The only reason George Lucas didn't ruin my childhood is because you got there first.

[HEADING=3]THOU SHALT STOP HYPING YOUR GAMES FIVE YEARS BEFORE YOU'VE EVEN ENTERED BETA[/HEADING]

Seriously, enough. Diablo what? It's been 73 years Blizzard. We will have flying cars and a city on the moon before the games we see in today's trailers actually come to market. Hype has a life cycle, you can't just keep stacking it up forever.

Except you, Arena.net. Keep stoking those Guild Wars 2 flames, I'm buying whatever you're selling, you glorious bastards.

[HEADING=3]THOU SHALT STOP PANDERING TO THE LOWEST COMMON DENOMINATOR[/HEADING]

It feels like that article that came out revealing that the average gamer is now in their thirties was ages ago. Surely we're all in our 50's by now, which means we're incontinent and unemployable and thus have more time for gaming than ever before. Whatever the case, when is the industry going to stop writing and marketing these goddam games for adults? I don't mean by adding more titties, either. We're already at maximum titty saturation. I mean when are we going to put aside the evil galaxy destroying robots and orc invasions and grow this medium up a little bit? It's sad when the most intelligent, sophisticated, adult game of the year looks like it came out in 1985, because the major developers are still aiming directly at the pleasure centers of 12 year old boys.

Arent half of these Game Making Commandments not Gaming Commandments?

Also, did you climb a Mountain and talked to fiery bush to get these? :D
 

NerfedFalcon

Level i Flare!
Mar 23, 2011
8,105
2,016
118
Gender
Male
Gamers, this one is on you:
If you say you're going to boycott buy a certain game as part of a group, make sure you actually stick to that.
Half of this is on that Modern Warfare 2 boycott a couple years back. I still remember the screenshot of all the group's members busy playing the game, which kinda doesn't work for "boycotting". 'But, but, we just want to know exactly how bad it is!' Then play it on a friend's machine.

The other half, naturally, is on Operation Rainfall. April 2nd, guys. And you only get a limited run of the game. Don't let us down by not buying it. ...That goes for a hypothetical release of Earthbound on Virtual Console, as well.
 

Fappy

\[T]/
Jan 4, 2010
12,010
0
41
Country
United States
Thou shalt not spoil new games- I am guilty of this myself. People need to be more conscious of discussing story spoilers in games when they have friends around who haven't beaten it yet. Especially bad in long RPGs >.>
 

Shoggoth2588

New member
Aug 31, 2009
10,247
0
0
Where's the edict about the return of the space-combat sim? Or the commandment condemning games where the entire gimmick is cover-based shooting? I can deal with games turning into shooters but when it comes to cover-based shooting I have to agree with what Yahtzee said X years ago: it's boring and kind of a cock-smack against the graphic designers and, other artists who worked on things that weren't chest-high walls.
 

Wolfram23

New member
Mar 23, 2004
4,095
0
0
ravenshrike said:
BloatedGuppy said:
Chess is simple.
No, Go is simple. Chess is quite complex.
No, chess is simple. There's not a lot of rules. It's pretty straight forward as far as how to play.

He (the OP) also specifically says "it conceals great depth". It's pretty accurate. Chess has a huge amount of depth built around simple rules.
 

Atmos Duality

New member
Mar 3, 2010
8,470
0
0
"THOU SHALT NOT ADD GRIND TO THY GAMEPLAY"

Focus on execution and content; not mindless reiteration.
 

Michael Hirst

New member
May 18, 2011
552
0
0
"THOU SHALT NOT SEIZE CONTROL FROM THY PLAYER"

I hate being mid-level during a big action sequence having lots of fun when suddenly the game TEARS the control away from me to show some pre-rendered scripted BS without warning leaving me feel like I'm just pressing buttons until the next video winds up.

Cutscenes are fine before I begin an action sequence and after but not during, don't ruin my fun and murder the fucking pace of what was a fun encounter.
 

gigastar

Insert one-liner here.
Sep 13, 2010
4,418
0
0
I support some, oppose others. Its just easier to quote and explain.
BloatedGuppy said:
[HEADING=3]THOU SHALT STOP CONFUSING STREAMLINING WITH SHALLOWNESS[/HEADING]
Careful with where thats applied to. Not everyone has a head for complexity and ive seen it firsthand. My sister is currently playing through Skyrim, it took her two weeks to even notice the perks system. And even then it was only through my help when she buckled and asked for it.

Even now i can just imagine some masochistic moron trying to play through Dark Souls without even realising that you can spend the collected souls on character improvement.

[HEADING=3]THOU SHALT GIVE US DLC WORTH BUYING[/HEADING]
Value of DLC depends largely on the individual, not much else to say there so ill just move on.

[HEADING=3]THOU SHALT GIVE US BETTER EXTRAS IN OUR COLLECTORS EDITIONS[/HEADING]
Im mostly in support of this, until the game you got the collectors edition, or should i say, Balls of Steel Edition, of was Duke Nukem Forever (or other suitably terrible game) then youre stuck with a bust on your shelf forever reminding you that you spent up to 3 times as much money on a game you hated.

Ill never stop mocking one of my friends for importing a Balls of Steel Edition to Europe. Never.

[HEADING=3]THOU SHALT REALIZE THAT CHALLENGE CAN BE REWARDING[/HEADING]
Yep, total agreement. Games that arent challenging in some way just arent as satisfying as a game that is.

[HEADING=3]BY THE SAME TOKEN, THOU SHALT REALIZE THAT GAMES CAN BE MORE THAN JUST CHALLENGES[/HEADING]
Yes, a game doesnt need to be a challenge to be enjoyable. Im finding Asura's Wrath is enjoyable to just watch and even if the gameplay does come out kind of mediocre ill still love it for that insane, over the top style it has in its cutscenes.

[HEADING=3]THOU SHALT STOP FORSAKING TURN BASED STRATEGY[/HEADING]
Not a fan of turn-based, so ill just shut up and move on.

[HEADING=3]THOU SHALT RECOGNIZE THAT NOT EVERYTHING NEEDS TO BE TURNED INTO A FUCKING SHOOTER[/HEADING]
This is one of the reasons why i love Capcom so much. To my knowledge theyre the only publisher to have not overseen any kind of FPS. Thats not to say they dont make shooters, they just arent very good.

[HEADING=3]THOU SHALT RESPECT THE PAST[/HEADING]
Erm, most publi-

EA, this one is for you.
Oh, right. Though to be fair, they are trying to make a Command and Conquer sequel properly this time, but thats not going to do justice to the many IP's they already ate up and now sit on.

[HEADING=3]THOU SHALT STOP HYPING YOUR GAMES FIVE YEARS BEFORE YOU'VE EVEN ENTERED BETA[/HEADING]
While my personal Give-a-Fuck meter for Diablo 3 is riding somewhere off the bottom of the scale, i doubt creating a rule based around one freak example is really justified.

Besides Diablo 3 was officially announced 4 years ago.

Except you, Arena.net. Keep stoking those Guild Wars 2 flames, I'm buying whatever you're selling, you glorious bastards.
Now Guild Wars 2, that was announced 5 years ago.

[HEADING=3]THOU SHALT STOP PANDERING TO THE LOWEST COMMON DENOMINATOR[/HEADING]
Unfortunately getting a true "adult game" out in todays world would mean having to make alot of public watchdogs worldwide and Fox News go suspiciously quiet, because hell knows they arent quietly going to let a game out to retail that features uncensored sex scenes and the like. Need i bring up what happened with Mass Effect again?

___

Heres one of my own that i feel nessesary.

[HEADING=3]THOU SHALT NOT MAKE AN ADAPTATION OF A MOVIE IF ITS TO COME OUT AT THE SAME TIME AS SAID MOVIE[/HEADING]
Seriously, has any movie adapted game since Spider-Man 2 ever been considered good by real review standards?

Im not against adaptations though. Theyre a great way to get good stories to people who cant stomach partiular types of media. Just take your damn time making it and make something quality.
 

Tanis

The Last Albino
Aug 30, 2010
5,262
0
0
"THOU SHALT NOT MAKE AI SO RETARDED YOU LOOSE A LEVEL BECAUSE THE CONVOY/PERSON YOU'RE SUPPOSE TO PROTECT GOES INTO A WALL AND NEVER BACKS OUT".

This should go for ANY game that has any kind of 'protect this dude/thing' missions.
RE4 was a FANTASTIC game, until that retarded blonde bimbo need protecting.
 

him over there

New member
Dec 17, 2011
1,728
0
0
Thou shalt not throw thous controllers across the room after making no progress for hours on end should be up there.