The amount of PS2s sold in Japan alone is not even a million less than the total amount of the Gamecubes sold worldwide. The Xbox did better, but combing the sales of the Xbox and the Gamecube still don't even make up a third of the amount of total PS2s that have been sold. That's not a monopoly, which they didn't say it was, but that's definitely a console dominance right there.amaranth_dru said:Nope, and actually the PSX almost failed in its first few years. Sega was still around back then and Nintendo also had consoles. So there was no undisputed dominance. PS2 era marked the failure of the Dreamcast and the rise of the Xbox, also Gamecube existed. So there was no monopoly for 15-16 years. Take off the nostalgia glasses.Angelous Wang said:Did you miss the the entire PS1&PS2 15-16 years of undisputed console dominance?amaranth_dru said:Sony will have free reign to charge whatever they want?
Even when they have the monopoly console game prices are kept in check by PC game prices and other things.
There are people who do that?amaranth_dru said:I'm not saying they will, I'm saying that people who root for Xbox and Nintendo to fail are short-sighted.
While I'm not counting Xbox One out in North America, I don't think it will have the unmitigated dominance that 360 had. Last time I asked what the preorders were looking like at my own local Gamestop, it was pretty much PS4 head and shoulders over the Xbox One. And I live in an area that has good internet access. So, that certainly wouldn't be a problem for people (keep in mind you need a Day One Patch to actually make it work).james.sponge said:I still think MS will be making money in the North America whereas sony will get European and Asian markets. Despite all that negative feedback xbone is getting we can't forget about that silent majority whose allegiance no one is able to determine not to mention the fact they can be easily swayed by marketing campaigns. And there is no reason to think MS or Sony will refrain from aggressive marketing strategies.
Pretty much. Still, it's probably better for PR than saying "Damn it guys, we were looking forward to dominating the market without you. Couldn't you have kept drinking the Kool-aid for a little longer?"ThunderCavalier said:So, what I read was:
"It's nice to know that Microsoft is actually going to try and go down with a fight rather than lie down and let us completely curbstomp them."
I wouldn't put Steam down yet. I know a lot of non core gamers who use Steam, and it's on the rise. Valve knows which way the wind is blowing, and they've been able to not only adjust to the market, but actively shape it in a big way. I could see them being a dominant force in the future of gaming, if the play their cards right, which they always do.amaranth_dru said:Put it like this folks, if Microsoft does lose and stop making consoles, and Nintendo decides the US market is no longer profitable, you realize that there will be no more competition to drive down prices and Sony will have free reign to charge whatever they want? Unless for some reason the SteamBox thing is embraced by the non-core gaming society, which I doubt heavily.
Less competition though will mean more you'll pay and no incentive for Sony to care what you say.
I look forward to seeing the xbox fail, Nintendo I hope keeps doing well along with Sony and hopefully another new console will come along they always do.amaranth_dru said:Nope, and actually the PSX almost failed in its first few years. Sega was still around back then and Nintendo also had consoles. So there was no undisputed dominance. PS2 era marked the failure of the Dreamcast and the rise of the Xbox, also Gamecube existed. So there was no monopoly for 15-16 years. Take off the nostalgia glasses.Angelous Wang said:Did you miss the the entire PS1&PS2 15-16 years of undisputed console dominance?amaranth_dru said:Sony will have free reign to charge whatever they want?
Even when they have the monopoly console game prices are kept in check by PC game prices and other things.
Fair enough. I agree it's a brilliant PR move, but I still disagree it in any way is a positive thing for Microsoft. As nice as they sound Sony are still twisting the knife in their competition. As if they see the Xbone as such a weak competitor they can afford to offer them sympathy and platitudes.Lightknight said:No, that's exactly when it's the hardest to be the big man. Considering that all of the ps4's preordered versions including the standard version are currently sold out, now would be an easy time to rub it in.Psychobabble said:"Yoshida then went on to give a fakey cough that sounded suspiciously like 'losers'"
It's pretty easy to be the "big man" when your opponent is busy hopping around in pain after shooting themselves in the foot.
Consider this, the only XBO version to sell out is the XBO Day one edition and that version sold less than the PS4 launch day version. The XBO has only two versions, standard and day one. The PS4 had six versions. Launch, Standard, and four bundles (Knack, Killzone, Watchdogs, Battlefield 4). All six versions are currently sold out and four of their versions are in 2013's 100 top seller's in video games list for amazon. The standard XBO isn't even on that list and isn't sold out.
So Sony is truly handing it to Microsoft right now. Even if the XBO eventually reaches that list, it'd still have a long way to catch up to just one of the other versions. Not to mention that I now the Killzone bundle isn't far from that list. I'm not sure about the knack version. I think that one had the least bundles for sale.
What Sony is doing here isn't showing class. I mean, it is. But what we're seeing is a company that has a marketing/pr department that deserves a raise. Whoever bungled their launch for ps3 must have been let go and these new guys learned from the predecessor's mistake. I even saw a PS4 add that I liked. Even chuckled at it. The one with the robots where the other gamers showed up late to the carnage after the early birds had already cleaned up. I remember ps3 ads that were practically designed for no other purpose to give people nightmares. I distinctly remember a weird crying baby doll with a broken eye that reminded me of Toy Story's creepiest scene.
except that we kinda can determine. judging by the largest seller - amazon - preorders for consoels software, even in USA sony dominates 3:1.james.sponge said:I still think MS will be making money in the North America whereas sony will get European and Asian markets. Despite all that negative feedback xbone is getting we can't forget about that silent majority whose allegiance no one is able to determine not to mention the fact they can be easily swayed by marketing campaigns. And there is no reason to think MS or Sony will refrain from aggressive marketing strategies.
Well it's actually Microsoft and Nintendo or if you like, Xbox One and Wii U. Just a pet peeve, choose to group things as companies or products.amaranth_dru said:I'm not saying they will, I'm saying that people who root for Xbox and Nintendo to fail are short-sighted.Vivi22 said:Anyone who honestly believes that Microsoft failing in the console business and/or Nintendo pulling out would lead to less competition doesn't know much about the history of the console industry.amaranth_dru said:Put it like this folks, if Microsoft does lose and stop making consoles, and Nintendo decides the US market is no longer profitable, you realize that there will be no more competition to drive down prices and Sony will have free reign to charge whatever they want? Unless for some reason the SteamBox thing is embraced by the non-core gaming society, which I doubt heavily.
Less competition though will mean more you'll pay and no incentive for Sony to care what you say.
No monopoly but Sony certainly had dominance and what did they do? They charged $40 for games (if memory serves) while Nintendo went on charging $50 and beyond.amaranth_dru said:Nope, and actually the PSX almost failed in its first few years. Sega was still around back then and Nintendo also had consoles. So there was no undisputed dominance. PS2 era marked the failure of the Dreamcast and the rise of the Xbox, also Gamecube existed. So there was no monopoly for 15-16 years. Take off the nostalgia glasses.Angelous Wang said:Did you miss the the entire PS1&PS2 15-16 years of undisputed console dominance?amaranth_dru said:Sony will have free reign to charge whatever they want?
Even when they have the monopoly console game prices are kept in check by PC game prices and other things.
I read on this site a while ago that Sony said if the PS4 isnt successful then there will be no PS5 - now the PS4 will sell well - but then you know companies an their sales. Like a game selling 6mil can be seen as a failure for some strange reason. They are in debt still, especially their entertainment department. MS, on the other hand will do well enough for another console. Sony really shouldn't keep making jokes about MS because if they do end up quitting the hardware business, they are going to be embarrassed by the fallout of MS comments. But personally, i hope both companies sell enough to make a console for the next-next gen.....or they just both work together and co produce a console.Mangod said:Atta boy, Sony! Keep rubbing the salt in that wound!
Honestly, I'm almost starting to feel bad for Microsoft.