Fox12 said:
I kind of wonder what the truth really is here, since every company is breaing records, and yet their all losing money.
In Sony's case it's more because of their other divisions failing, while only a few of them are really doing well. The Playstation division really pulled up from how it launched last gen, but at the same time the handling of the Vita hasn't been very good. Meanwhile, their other divisions are pulling them down. Really some of this should have been and could have been prevented years ago, but it wasn't and now the repercussions are strong. Sony's big problem is their pricing for one, as their TVs are really good quality but are way too expensive to buy or repair when compared to competitors, which is how Samsung pulled ahead with Smart TVs. Their limiting of their cellphones, which many say are good, is downright stupid; I mean in all honesty, I don't know a single person at my work or in my group of college friends who use T-Mobile. Their music division still has the problem the entire music industry really has now: they never adapted and accepted .mp3 format when it started.
Really, they overreached too much and spread out to far and into too many fields for them to manage. What really helped topple Rome over in the past, it was because their nation was too large to manage effectively, and Sony's in that predicament now. Will they die, no because they've still got fallbacks, but I expect them to downsize quite a bit over time which could be good or bad. We don't know yet, but hopefully they'll be fine. Honestly, I expect Samsung to be in this same situation sometime in the future because they are basically following in the same footsteps Sony did back in the day. Whether that takes 5, 10, or 20 years though we don't know.
In Nintendo's case, yeah they've got money in the bank to last them, but their handling of the Wii U at launch up until about this point has been terrible. They had a similar problem with the 3DS when it launched at it's obscenely high price. But when the 3DS was stable, Nintendo didn't focus on the Wii U and kept pumping more and more out on the 3DS, ignoring the Wii U for quite some time. Now they are finally focusing on the Wii U, but it's too late for it to be the number one seller this generation and it will most likely be the next GameCube in all honesty. Plus, their lack of creating cohesive and informative advertising has been a huge downfall on their part entirely, along with their naming convention. Many people were, and still are, confused about the Wii U due to the naming, and with things like the "New 3DS" it's only gonna get worse if they don't competently advertise. Same goes for games, as I don't think I need to mention how badly Wonderful 101 did when it had basically no advertising. Now Smash Bros just reported hitting 1 million in 2 days, but that's because Smash Bros is both a) a known franchise with a large fanbase and b) received good advertising in Japan. Wonderful 101 on the other hand was a new, exclusive IP for the Wii U, had practically no advertising at all, and was a complete financial failure because of it, despite the game being a lot of fun (bought it launch day).
Microsoft in their case don't really seem to care about how much money they really spend on things, which can be quite concerning at times. While I don't really mind them buying Mojang, I think that 2.5 billion is still way too damn much to spend on the company to buy it. They will continue to spend ludicrous amounts as well until their other divisions don't bring in as much, which may eventually happen. As someone above mentioned, Microsoft's constant attempts to go into over-saturated markets so late hasn't really been the most successful thing for them in the past. Not to mention, shareholders and investors have much more power and say in how Microsoft functions than for both Nintendo and Sony.
All in all, every one of the major console companies have made mistakes that are either biting them in the ass now, or will possibly do so in the future. The money isn't infinite, and Sony's financial problems should show that being the case. Now do I want any company to "drop out" or "go out of business"? Hell no, and no one should want that. The drop out of a major competitor would be felt all over the industry because all 3 console manufacturers have such large market shares in general. When SEGA dropped out, they were already replaced by Sony's Playstation brand, which is why the effects of a major console manufacturer weren't felt too much. With Atari, SEGA and mainly Nintendo had already replaced them so it wasn't too much. But now, I don't think there are many companies that would easily take any gap left if any of the 3 dropped out.