Yup, but here's the thing: there were several failures on Sony's part here that, if they weren't there, would've at least made the hack less severe. For example: I sure as hell wouldn't keep the information of 77 million accounts in one concentrated place. Instead, I'd have the information split up regionally. While this obviously doesn't prevent hacks, it does make it so that the hackers won't be getting everything you happen to have.Aeonknight said:You do know that no system is impossible to hack, right?SuperMse said:Yeah, and so was BP.
I'm sorry, but the bitching is justified, because this NEVER SHOULD HAVE HAPPENED IN THE FIRST PLACE.
Obviously the guy/gal who pulled this stunt wasn't a scrub. He knew his way around a computer better than 99% of the users out there. Hell there's no guarentee that this same person couldn't turn around and pull this stunt on microsoft.
At the end of the day, shit happens.
And, hell, how does it take a week to find out whether your servers were hacked or not? It shouldn't take that long to figure this shit out if you have everything be monitored... especially huge database transactions. I know people in security firms like this and they usually have things like this figured out within 48 hours. And that's really the slowest, worst case scenario.
Shit like this really is inexcusable and I wouldn't at all be surprised if the whole "no firewall, old versions of Apache" story were true. This was the company that used constants for data that was supposed to be random, which ended up being the biggest reason the PS3 was hacked to begin with.
So, no, I have no reason to feel sorry for a multi-billion dollar corporation that has failed at just about everything they've done this generation.