Irridium said:[http://www.speedtest.net]
All you lucky bastards with your greater than 1mbs connection speeds...
Ah, Talktalk.Octorok said:MEANWHILE, IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
[http://www.speedtest.net]
~300kb a second. That's actually pretty good for here (Scotland). What you can't see is that the connection drops 2-3 times a day. Always at the end of long downloads and during online games.
[sup]Seriously, every goddamn time[/sup]
pffft. I pay £18 for mine...Although I live in Aylesbury where fibre optic is a local myth.Potato Dragon said:[http://www.speedtest.net]
Come to Milton Keynes I pay £30 a month for this also BT are ok
Forgetting porn for a minute, you could use internet like that to make full blu-ray quality streaming video possible for the average person. Current "1080P" internet video uses a much heavier compression scheme than Blu-ray does, which makes the video noticeably lower quality. I can guarantee that somewhere in this world there is someone complaining about how the cable companies still exist, instead of giving everyone alacarte video portals over the internet. The reason for it is the internet doesn't currently have enough bandwidth to do that. This, and Google's 1 gigabit network along with it, are a step in the direction of fixing that problem, and making that all digital future that people keep talking about technically possible. Because right now, it isn't.Product Placement said:Well, Japan's birth rate has been plummeting, so I'll take this a valid explanation.Kahani said:Porn, obviously. All the porn.Product Placement said:although I can't for the life of me understand what the average user could use it for
But damn... how High Definition do you need the stuff to be?
You think that's bad? I had about 0.31mbps on the day Max Payne 3 came out, and I had pre-ordered it on Steam. It took a fucking WEEK of constant power to download 30GBs.CalPal said:Pretty much the same over here in Canada - I'm currently in the Capital finishing my 3rd year of study - though there is one day that still haunts my nightmares whenever I think of internet connection up here...
*shivers* that was a bad, near-rage inducing day, that was...
I have BT broadband, how the hell do you get that sort of speed? I get 5Mb/s at most. What's most annoying is that all the fibre-optic services offered in my town are everywhere, except the tiny section of road I live in because I live on top of a hill. Utter bullshit, I say!Sizzle Montyjing said:Snip
That would be me!Owyn_Merrilin said:I can guarantee that somewhere in this world there is someone complaining about how the cable companies still exist, instead of giving everyone alacarte video portals over the internet. The reason for it is the internet doesn't currently have enough bandwidth to do that.
It wouldn't matter which of the ISP's was in the area, you'd still got fucked over by them.NameIsRobertPaulson said:DVS BSTrD said:T3hSource said:Swedes are not impressed, I can tell you that for a fact.
I don't know how Westerners tolerate >50 Mbps connections.[http://s1097.photobucket.com/user/Unit-22/media/2579314403_zps1eb973e8.png.html]
Because we've never had anything better. I've smashed my own computer twice (literally) raging over shitty connections. Fios won't even come to my town.[Insert Asian penis joke here]Product Placement said:Well, Japan's birth rate has been plummeting, so I'll take this a valid explanation.Kahani said:Porn, obviously. All the porn.Product Placement said:although I can't for the life of me understand what the average user could use it for
But damn... how High Definition do you need the stuff to be?
that's what she said[http://www.speedtest.net]
You got me beat. Then again, Comcast has a monopoly over in the Northwest, so not like we have options.
The problem comes in when all things are being streamed or downloaded, with no physical media or alternative distribution (cable, satellite, terrestrial) methods. The internet as a whole just doesn't have enough bandwidth to do everything on its own just yet. Things like Netflix work now because A.) they're heavily compressed[footnote]people have done comparisons between "HD" Netflix, an upconverted DVD, and a blu-ray, and I pretty much just listed the quality levels from worst to best.[/footnote], and B.) there are other ways to get that content, and not everybody uses or has Netflix. If suddenly the only method of getting videos, videogames, music, books, you name it became the internet, the whole thing would crash and burn. It would probably do it on movies alone, truth be told. That's one of the biggest reasons the rumors about an online only Xbox are crazy -- the internet couldn't handle that right now. Maybe in 10 or 20 years, if stuff like the network in this article keeps getting made, but not at the moment.Big_Boss_Mantis said:That would be me!Owyn_Merrilin said:I can guarantee that somewhere in this world there is someone complaining about how the cable companies still exist, instead of giving everyone alacarte video portals over the internet. The reason for it is the internet doesn't currently have enough bandwidth to do that.
I refuse to pay for cable companies. I bug the people that pays. I complain about it everytime I watch TV ("what do you mean when you say that you provide a service to remind me when my favorite show is about to start? I shouldn't be planning my apppointments around YOUR schedule! YOU should be brodcasting what I want, when I want!").
I scream to the four winds all my hatred to people being submitted to pay for channels they DON'T want to get the few they do want.
I complain about that almost every second of my waking hours. (and probably during sleep too)
Yeah, my family probably hates me right now!
But I don't think that I agree that this is a connection problem. This is a market problem.
In my country (Brazil) most people that can afford cable TV can also afford reasonable internet (I am talking about the big capitals, of course... Brazil is a big country and things are complicated by the countryside)...
So, even if the market is still small for internet-based television, there is a viable market.
Netflix is there to prove it!
But, as often, the problem is the market clinging to old business models until the last possible moment.
OT: I can't really understand what takes so long for the internet infrastructure to advance with the available technology. When I hear that there are places on the Unites States with dial up I get the sensation that THE FUTURE IS LATE! When I started using the internet, in the late 90s I thought that by 2010 we would be streaming EVERYTHING from the web, that hard drives would be a thing from the past, broadcast times on TV would be dead, and so on ...
In this day and age, places without broadband should be as unacceptable as places without electricity.
I am starting to sound like Adam Orth, but don't misunderstand me. Unlike him, I know that we are not living in that world yet. What I am saying is that it is the unavoidable future, and that I am a little surprised we're not there yet!