Sometimes (not often) Sony can come out of nowhere with an awesome bit of marketing.
Too bad I already own all of these games.
Too bad I already own all of these games.
Sony Reveals Franchise-Spanning Game Collections
- Thread starter Fanghawk
- Start date
That's nice and all Sony, but where is Fatal Frame Trilogy HD!
...Come to think of it, who has the rights to Fatal Frame?
...Come to think of it, who has the rights to Fatal Frame?
Wait.
When did they make InFamous 2 move compatible?
OT: 5 GoW games in one? That's almost as good as the Orange Box. Too bad the only one that I semi-enjoyed was 3.
When did they make InFamous 2 move compatible?
OT: 5 GoW games in one? That's almost as good as the Orange Box. Too bad the only one that I semi-enjoyed was 3.
Seeing as how I don't care for Disney, and didn't care for KH1 when I first tried a friend's copy, I would still get this and try it out if it ever happened, see if I can be converted.Capitano Segnaposto said:
Also, have Sora & Co. ever visited the world of Studio Ghibli or anything? What about Gargoyles or The Mighty Ducks?
I only stated that as there tends to be some level of hostility towards companies monetizing things that already exist versus releasing new products. I was being dramatic when I used the quantifier "lots" in the sentence.. and a little sarcastic.Zachary Amaranth said:
Give me a full-and-complete ".hack//COLLECTION" spanning from Infection to Link...and we'll talk.
Yay! Maybe they might release collections of franchises and actually include the first game! You know, like Metal Gear and Silent Hill 
Yes, yes I am still bitter about that. And yes, yes I do know neither of those franchises are Sony, move along.
But in all seriousness, considering we're approaching the end of the generation (It's pretty much official, we just gotta accept it now) this isn't a bad move for generating some revenue and getting a grasp of how popular these franchises are and see which ones should be getting priority over the others in the next generation. Plus consumers can more easily get their hands on the games and collectors can more easily get their hands on the original individual titles. All in all, I see no losing so have at it.
Yes, yes I am still bitter about that. And yes, yes I do know neither of those franchises are Sony, move along.But in all seriousness, considering we're approaching the end of the generation (It's pretty much official, we just gotta accept it now) this isn't a bad move for generating some revenue and getting a grasp of how popular these franchises are and see which ones should be getting priority over the others in the next generation. Plus consumers can more easily get their hands on the games and collectors can more easily get their hands on the original individual titles. All in all, I see no losing so have at it.
I think it's kinda funny how they're re-releasing old titles for the new(est) console while remembering the reason they removed the backwards compatability in the first place.
"Because we believe that people buy PS3's to play PS3 games"
I'm thinking it's more along the lines of:
"Because we want to make more money by re-selling these old games again and again"
Now, who's betting the next sony console will actually have it?
didn't think so
"Because we believe that people buy PS3's to play PS3 games"
I'm thinking it's more along the lines of:
"Because we want to make more money by re-selling these old games again and again"
Now, who's betting the next sony console will actually have it?
didn't think so
Come on Front Mission Collection and Armored Core Collection. As per internet traditions you now know my extreme wishful thinking.