Space Marines: They're becoming wimpier with each generation (Now with added ORK!)

Kadamon

New member
Feb 8, 2009
276
0
0
ward. said:
Kadamon said:
Edit: Ok, Warhammer 40k has been out before Doom or Starship troopers. Warhammer 40k has been out since 1983 and started as a tabletop game. And also about people saying that the WH40k Space Marines not being well equipped, you obviously haven't look into it for very long.

Not saying they are the definition, but definitely saying they were the peak.
While the first part isn't entirely correct the last part is, Warhammers marines are the epitome of marine awesomeness.
I meant the Starship Trooper movies.

And yes, the epitome of Space Marines

*Starts up chainsword*
 

Kadamon

New member
Feb 8, 2009
276
0
0
Hunde Des Krieg said:
Kadamon said:
Edit: Ok, Warhammer 40k has been out before Doom or Starship troopers. Warhammer 40k has been out since 1983 and started as a tabletop game. And also about people saying that the WH40k Space Marines not being well equipped, you obviously haven't look into it for very long.
^Huh? Dude, Troopers is first 1953=earliest
The movies man, THE MOVIES! Wow, I can't believe I'm still hearing this...
 

Kadamon

New member
Feb 8, 2009
276
0
0
olicon said:
Kadamon said:
pantsoffdanceoff said:
Really? There's a pretty obvious one-up to your average space marine for just the badassliness factor. Chaos Space Marine.

Although if I was to choose one armor-toting man to rule them all, Gordon Freeman. But he doesn't really count does he?
But he COULD be the Emperor (lord of all Space Marines)

Praise the Emperor
Or
Praise the Freeman?
Why shouldn't Freeman be considered a space marine? Sure, he's not 12 feet tall, but he can leap a 30feet ledge and snipe someone from 3 football fields away. Plus, he's actually recruited by intergalactic mercenary agency (G-man), so he must have had a lot going for him. Did I mentioned he decimated the Combines virtually by himself?

The Master Chief wasn't that much of a wuss, but compared to 40K marines, he is one. But even then, the Master Chief is pretty strong compared to other recent space marines, like the new Red Faction guy, GoW Cogs, and that other game where you fly around and shoot people.
And I don't think it's done for the sake of game balance or anything either. The newer marines are just that way because they are the good guys. How many of you can honestly claim the 40K space monstrosities are truly the good guys?
Gordon Freeman is a Space Marine. And any other word you can think of that is manly.

About Space Marines: they are complex. To some they are an amazing column of power, but to others they are cruel people. Kill in the name of good, but kill with basically a chainsaw. Space Marines have more depth than Master Chief or The GoW Cogs.

And again, they spit acid.
 

Kadamon

New member
Feb 8, 2009
276
0
0
keyton777 said:
Kadamon said:
Eipok Kruden said:
Kadamon said:
Eipok Kruden said:
Kadamon said:
Dude, they wear big armor because they ARE big, about 12 feet tall and need a lot of armor to cover themselves. If you want sleek, stay AWAY from Space Marines, because staying alive is better than looking SEXY to the opposite RACE

http://mind-games.com/temp40/w4k.jpg

Does a shoulder plate really need to be THAT sophisticated?
Why are they 12 feet tall in the first place? How is that practical?
Because they were born that way?

Astartes were made different from humans, gene-created to be the most powerful and ultimate soldiers of all time. They have 4 lungs, 2 heart, and a lot of other extra things in their body. You can't fit it all in the human anatomy.
I know they were genetically engineered, but why do they need to be 12 feet tall, have 4 lungs, 2 hearts, and tons of backup organs? If something is 12 feet tall, it's a lot harder to maneuver and a lot easier to shoot. The Space Marines also have to drive specially made vehicles to accommodate their size. Why were they engineered so impractically? That is NOT what a super-soldier should be. A super soldier is something like the Master Chief. Small, lean, fast, agile, and efficient. He can use any weapon and any vehicle he can get his hands on and he's extremely powerful and fast due to the powered exoskeleton he's in.
*A Space Marine Astartes takes a blow to the chest, the round penetrating deep into his organs, ripping apart his lungs and heart*

*He shrugs them off, the wounds quickly healing themselves and re-orienting his breath and cardio to his other side of the body, making up for the organs*

To be big is to be better, can you really say that Master Chief could stop a man into oblivion? (Or survive getting ran over by a jeep...)

well, he wouldnt get hit by said jeep cause he would just jump or step out of the way...
and i think a rocket to the face will pretty much kill ur 12ft freak on legs.
which a smaller and faster normal human could find and fire with ease.
size doesnt make you powerful, size mean literally nothing more than a big target in battle, the smaller the faster, the less often you die
simple
All of you just don't stop!

Space Marines were built to be strong, big, and AGILE. A Space Marine has more of a chance to jump out of the way of a rocket even WITHOUT any cybernetic enhancements, because they have enhanced MINDS too.

Anyway, Master Chief isn't exactly the quickest person in the world either.

Praise The Emperor!
 

Specter_

New member
Dec 24, 2008
736
0
0
scumofsociety said:
Assassinator said:
People here are confusing "awesomeness" with things like "effectivness" and stuff ^^ Sure Guards may be better against Space Marines, but that doesn't make an individual Guard not more awesome then an individual Space Marine.
Bah! You know nothing! On page 63 of the guards codex it clearly states that the Awesomeness stat (A) for an individual guard is 1, as is that of a space marine...tabletop stats people! From this we can clearly see that an individual guard is as awesome as an individual marine. Not to mention on page 150 of Gaunts Ghosts where...etc etc
Oh come on! You bring Gaunt's Ghosts here?! Gaunt kills a Chaos Space Marines in a 1-on-1 meleefight (Traitor General).
The W40k-fluff sucks, because whatever faction is depicted is so totally awesome they can take on the combinated force of Behemoth and Kraken singlehandedly with nothing but a stringtanga and a blade of grass.

Kadamon said:
Hunde Des Krieg said:
Kadamon said:
Edit: Ok, Warhammer 40k has been out before Doom or Starship troopers. Warhammer 40k has been out since 1983 and started as a tabletop game. And also about people saying that the WH40k Space Marines not being well equipped, you obviously haven't look into it for very long.
^Huh? Dude, Troopers is first 1953=earliest
The movies man, THE MOVIES! Wow, I can't believe I'm still hearing this...
You're hearing it because the movie is shit. You talk about Starship Troopers, you talk about the book.
 

Kadamon

New member
Feb 8, 2009
276
0
0
Specter_ said:
scumofsociety said:
Assassinator said:
People here are confusing "awesomeness" with things like "effectivness" and stuff ^^ Sure Guards may be better against Space Marines, but that doesn't make an individual Guard not more awesome then an individual Space Marine.
Bah! You know nothing! On page 63 of the guards codex it clearly states that the Awesomeness stat (A) for an individual guard is 1, as is that of a space marine...tabletop stats people! From this we can clearly see that an individual guard is as awesome as an individual marine. Not to mention on page 150 of Gaunts Ghosts where...etc etc
Oh come on! You bring Gaunt's Ghosts here?! Gaunt kills a Chaos Space Marines in a 1-on-1 meleefight (Traitor General).
The W40k-fluff sucks, because whatever faction is depicted is so totally awesome they can take on the combinated force of Behemoth and Kraken singlehandedly with nothing but a stringtanga and a blade of grass.

Kadamon said:
Hunde Des Krieg said:
Kadamon said:
Edit: Ok, Warhammer 40k has been out before Doom or Starship troopers. Warhammer 40k has been out since 1983 and started as a tabletop game. And also about people saying that the WH40k Space Marines not being well equipped, you obviously haven't look into it for very long.
^Huh? Dude, Troopers is first 1953=earliest
The movies man, THE MOVIES! Wow, I can't believe I'm still hearing this...
You're hearing it because the movie is shit. You talk about Starship Troopers, you talk about the book.
Well I'm sorry sir but I haven't read the book, like how most of you guys have never read A Warhammer 40k book (there are many...)
 

Grenbyron

New member
Dec 31, 2008
178
0
0
Kadamon said:
What happened to us? Why have we let scrawnier Space Marines thrived?
Lets be fair, the marines you are describing are wimpy compared to what they came from. As powerful as they were the Primarchs make them look like children. The books constantly say the technology was lost and hint that because of the religion the arose around the Emperor and the machine god the technology is no longer "researched". Lets face it, you can only photocopy a picture so many times before it looks nothing like the original.
 

Kadamon

New member
Feb 8, 2009
276
0
0
Grenbyron said:
Kadamon said:
What happened to us? Why have we let scrawnier Space Marines thrived?
Lets be fair, the marines you are describing are wimpy compared to what they came from. As powerful as they were the Primarchs make them look like children. The books constantly say the technology was lost and hint that because of the religion the arose around the Emperor and the machine god the technology is no longer "researched". Lets face it, you can only photocopy a picture so many times before it looks nothing like the original.
Well I couldn't find any good pictures of Primarchs, and lets face it, the Emperor is just a stack of bones on life support. Also the Machine God is the Void Dragon Necron god, and the Emperor god is... the Emperor in the Lectio Divanitus
 

Grenbyron

New member
Dec 31, 2008
178
0
0
Kadamon said:
Grenbyron said:
Kadamon said:
What happened to us? Why have we let scrawnier Space Marines thrived?
Lets be fair, the marines you are describing are wimpy compared to what they came from. As powerful as they were the Primarchs make them look like children. The books constantly say the technology was lost and hint that because of the religion the arose around the Emperor and the machine god the technology is no longer "researched". Lets face it, you can only photocopy a picture so many times before it looks nothing like the original.
Well I couldn't find any good pictures of Primarchs, and lets face it, the Emperor is just a stack of bones on life support. Also the Machine God is the Void Dragon Necron god, and the Emperor god is... the Emperor in the Lectio Divanitus
I always wanted them to make an army based off the Tech-priests of Mars. I just like giant war machines which is why I play a Space Marine Drop Pod army and Tau Army.

On another note, if I remember correctly the ORCS used to be alot bigger as well. ORCS were at least as tall as a space marine and were described as being able to tear a humans limbs off with ease.
 

Kadamon

New member
Feb 8, 2009
276
0
0
Grenbyron said:
Kadamon said:
Grenbyron said:
Kadamon said:
What happened to us? Why have we let scrawnier Space Marines thrived?
Lets be fair, the marines you are describing are wimpy compared to what they came from. As powerful as they were the Primarchs make them look like children. The books constantly say the technology was lost and hint that because of the religion the arose around the Emperor and the machine god the technology is no longer "researched". Lets face it, you can only photocopy a picture so many times before it looks nothing like the original.
Well I couldn't find any good pictures of Primarchs, and lets face it, the Emperor is just a stack of bones on life support. Also the Machine God is the Void Dragon Necron god, and the Emperor god is... the Emperor in the Lectio Divanitus
I always wanted them to make an army based off the Tech-priests of Mars. I just like giant war machines which is why I play a Space Marine Drop Pod army and Tau Army.

On another note, if I remember correctly the ORCS used to be alot bigger as well. ORCS were at least as tall as a space marine and were described as being able to tear a humans limbs off with ease.
BY GOD YOU'RE RIGHT! TO THE EDITING BUTTON!
 

Grenbyron

New member
Dec 31, 2008
178
0
0
Kadamon said:
Grenbyron said:
Kadamon said:
Grenbyron said:
Kadamon said:
What happened to us? Why have we let scrawnier Space Marines thrived?
Lets be fair, the marines you are describing are wimpy compared to what they came from. As powerful as they were the Primarchs make them look like children. The books constantly say the technology was lost and hint that because of the religion the arose around the Emperor and the machine god the technology is no longer "researched". Lets face it, you can only photocopy a picture so many times before it looks nothing like the original.
Well I couldn't find any good pictures of Primarchs, and lets face it, the Emperor is just a stack of bones on life support. Also the Machine God is the Void Dragon Necron god, and the Emperor god is... the Emperor in the Lectio Divanitus
I always wanted them to make an army based off the Tech-priests of Mars. I just like giant war machines which is why I play a Space Marine Drop Pod army and Tau Army.

On another note, if I remember correctly the ORCS used to be alot bigger as well. ORCS were at least as tall as a space marine and were described as being able to tear a humans limbs off with ease.
BY GOD YOU'RE RIGHT! TO THE EDITING BUTTON!
HEHE, perhaps there is only so much "Tall" allowed in the universe. The Chaos gods took all the tall with the Avatar and Ogern taking what was left.
 

Eipok Kruden

New member
Aug 29, 2008
1,209
0
0
j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:
Bah! When you get right down to it, what does Master Chief really have to deal with? Cowardly intergalactic stunties armed with pea shooters. Cowardly sniper rats with shields. Maybe the odd brain-dead gorilla or zombie. That's not Space Marining! My nan could do that.

40K Space Marines however... they have to fend off the collective might of the Nids, Orkz, Eldar, Dark Eldar, Necrons, Tau and the forces of Chaos. If you're unaware of any of these races, let me illustrate-
I'm tired of participating in this pointless debate. I play DoW, I know about the Warhammer universe. You, on the other hand, do not know about the Halo universe. I'm not going to argue about this anymore.
 

Sewblon

New member
Nov 5, 2008
3,107
0
0
Alex_P said:
Sewblon said:
We should have abandoned space marines once someone made a game about a theoretical physicist killing aliens.
To be fair, that was only his degree -- his actual job was more like "lab *****".

-- Alex
Yeah but the point was they had a protagonist the core audience of gaming can actually identify with but space marine became the standard again anyway.
 

Zykon TheLich

Extra Heretical!
Legacy
Jun 6, 2008
3,503
845
118
Country
UK
Specter_ said:
scumofsociety said:
Bah! You know nothing! On page 63 of the guards codex it clearly states that the Awesomeness stat (A) for an individual guard is 1, as is that of a space marine...tabletop stats people! From this we can clearly see that an individual guard is as awesome as an individual marine. Not to mention on page 150 of Gaunts Ghosts where...etc etc
Oh come on! You bring Gaunt's Ghosts here?! Gaunt kills a Chaos Space Marines in a 1-on-1 meleefight (Traitor General).
The W40k-fluff sucks, because whatever faction is depicted is so totally awesome they can take on the combinated force of Behemoth and Kraken singlehandedly with nothing but a stringtanga and a blade of grass.
No, no, it's canon, do you hear me?! SACRED CANON! None shall question the authority of a single line of print.
 

Alex_P

All I really do is threadcrap
Mar 27, 2008
2,712
0
0
Kadamon said:
http://www.gamereplays.org/community/uploads/post-90027-1205171981.jpg
...
http://media.photobucket.com/image/ork/bravest_slann/Or.jpg?o=72
Okay, found the problem:

What you define as "not wimpy" or "awesome", I tend to think of as "absurd" and "ridiculous".

Bulging muscles. Tiny/giant heads. Descriptions of how the characters are ten feet tall because, apparently, the standard trope of six-foot-tall heroes just doesn't cut it anymore. Acid-spitting.

Don't get me wrong, 40k as a setting actually has some interesting stuff in it. But it's not in the bulging muscles and tiny/giant heads. That stuff is -- well, it's downright comical. And, to be honest, I think it was always intended to be that way.

-- Alex
 

Bretty

New member
Jul 15, 2008
864
0
0
I can't believe this is still going on, lol.

I just finished reading the first in the series of the Horus Heresy books... Great books and a great read to find out more about the 40k universe.

They are the first thing I think of and see when I think of a marine. So for the sake of argument I should be right!
 

Bulletinmybrain

New member
Jun 22, 2008
3,277
0
0
Grey Knight>Sparten


Not only are they physic, and could destory master chief with his mind, he could just as easily crush him with his massive erection spear/sword.
 

Wyatt

New member
Feb 14, 2008
384
0
0
Alex_P said:
Okay, found the problem:

What you define as "not wimpy" or "awesome", I tend to think of as "absurd" and "ridiculous".

Bulging muscles. Tiny/giant heads. Descriptions of how the characters are ten feet tall because, apparently, the standard trope of six-foot-tall heroes just doesn't cut it anymore. Acid-spitting.

Don't get me wrong, 40k as a setting actually has some interesting stuff in it. But it's not in the bulging muscles and tiny/giant heads. That stuff is -- well, it's downright comical. And, to be honest, I think it was always intended to be that way.

-- Alex
i dont know about that last line alex. ive read some of the books, played the games, and had a pal that lived and breathed playing the table top game of 40k, but im far from an expert. but knowing what i do about the universe, it kinda makes alot of sence when you relize that humans eventualy face deamons/chaos. that IS what the original storyline was was it not? the big war between deamons and mankind? all the other 'races' were kinda tossed in later it seems to me as just an excuse to add more army's but the lore of the universe is about man facing deamons.

anyhow what you lack in 'magic' you need to make up in some other way if your to fight and survive that war. that way is by tech and breading 'super human' soldiers. that would require alot of effort by ALL of humankind and to get that effort our society would need to change radicaly and most likley not for the better. i can actualy see something like the 40k universe developing as a real senario given enough eons to develope. well that and assuming that we ever come face to face with REAL deamons and Jesus isnt around to stop them.

i just dont know really, from a social dynamic point of view i think its a very well developed universe for science fiction. and while i will agree that starship troopers (the book) the space marines were pretty cool , from the point of view of the society then as well as various aspects of the 'war' itself i dont think it was that well done. lots of gaping flaws in Heinleins views on what the future would bring. a read through of starship troopers clearly shows the 'cold war' mindset of the time it was written what with the major enemy being a 'hive mind'. Russia and china anyone? and the 'small wars' fought, remind you of vietnam or Korea? or any number of 'brush wars' fought between the Soviets and Americans. he extended the 1950s into space a couple hundered years from now. (Much like Star Trek did at first) but its clear he put very little thought into how a society could change and develope even over that small a time frame. with the 40K universe it strikes me that some thought HAS gone into how much humankind could change in 40 thousands years, and just as MUCH thought has gone into how some things about humans stay very much the same.

its the society of the 40K universe that makes me like it, not the whole goth religious aspects but the way in wich it developed into that. if you assume for a moment that we humans DO meet God in the future and we DO come face to face with real deamons its actualy a rather accurate society that 40k depicts. humans have been forming armys for 'god' since recorded history, if the REAL God shows up and decided he needed a force of Space Marines do you really think that force wouldnt be the most ultimate kick ass army its even possable to create? and dont you think that the a society that was under attack by deamons for thousands of years wouldnt eventualy develope into something like 40k established?

all in all im not sure that it was ment to be funny. im certian some aspects of it are but for the most part it just seems grim and very very human.

anyhow i picked up a copy of starship troopers after seeing the movie, i often do that just too see how bad the movie butcher'd the book and too no supprise of mine it was a compleate disgrace. the book was good to my supprise, i dont often enjoy older sci-fie with the exception of Dune and some of Niven's work but i wasnt all that impressed with the whole starship troopers as a fighting force. two things make a good fighting force, your tech and your training, the starship troopers had the tech but their training as described in the book wasnt even as tough as Basic every day US Marines is now. thats not even talking about special forces training and we can assume that the troopers would be that universes equilivent of the Navy Seals or the GSG9 or the SAS. they just seemed rather piss poor as an army if they didnt have their suits, on the other hand a 40K marine would still be an awsome force armor or no. i can see a marine fighting to the death buck ass naked but i cant see a trooper without his suit doing anything but runing like a girl.