+1Shanecooper said:I don't know, but that would be one hell of an episode of 'deadliest warrior'.
+1Shanecooper said:I don't know, but that would be one hell of an episode of 'deadliest warrior'.
Azmael Silverlance said:On the other hand i believe Master Chief vs a Space Marine is a pure Spartan win.
ask a star wars fan, he will give you an encyclopaedia of all the ways star wars beats everything..... despite the second bigger badder death star with no exposed ..exhaust port was beaten by ewoks.Sojoez said:Is there actually ANYTHING outside the WH40K universe that could beat an Astartes? As in, from an other game?
Nah theyd just F it up like they do every timemackanmeost said:+1Shanecooper said:I don't know, but that would be one hell of an episode of 'deadliest warrior'.
Understandable. Can we agree though that both universes are somewhat equal on this particular matter? As far as armor, training, genetic augmentation and reflexes are still open for debate?kingcom said:My point was explaining that marine drops aren't just getting into a pod and using gravity to get you there.Magicman10893 said:My point was that being dropped from space in drop pods isn't really saying much considering they do that in the Halo universe too.kingcom said:Problem is, even if the chief gets into melee combat with the marine, he still has to both hit him, and hit something vital. Other than straight decapitation, the marine is prtty much at a functional level of fighting.Magicman10893 said:I just wanted to point out that in the Halo universe there are regular (as in, not genetically enhanced) soldiers that are dropped from orbit in a way that completely rips of Warhammer 40K, not to mention that the Chief and Noble 6 from Halo Reach (Noble 6 being a member of the inferior generation of Spartans) are both dropped from orbit with just their armor to protect them and survive just fine. The only problem suffered was Noble 6 lost his gun while falling from space.
EDIT: My two cents are that the Astartes would win 9 times out of 10. The only way I see a Spartan winning the fight is if the Spartan could manage to get in close enough to use the Energy Sword to cut through their armor. I assume that it would be able to cut through it because it is essentially a Lightsaber.
But this is wholly irrelevant because you can't compare the two universes. I mean, Warhammer is literally almost 35 thousand years ahead of Halo. Aside from technological dark ages, there is still at least 20+ thousand years of technological improvement over Halo. That would be like debating on who would win in a fight between a team of Green Beret/NAVY SEAL/SAS/Spetsnaz and a Samurai.
Also in warhammer 40k there is an entire imperial guard division that specialises in lower orbit drops (these guys sometimes do in with nothing but a jump pack let alone being in a secure drop pod). The idea of the Space Marine drops is they ride alongside the lance and macro cannon battery strikes (i.e. they are literally fired at the planet at the same time as giant laser beams and they are directed at the exact same landing zone). That way they can clear the landing zone and provide cover for any anti-air defences.
Ask a fan anything about his fandom vs another and you will get a biased opinion.O maestre said:ask a star wars fan, he will give you an encyclopaedia of all the ways star wars beats everything..... despite the second bigger badder death star with no exposed ..exhaust port was beaten by ewoks.Sojoez said:Is there actually ANYTHING outside the WH40K universe that could beat an Astartes? As in, from an other game?
I can't give you a 100% guarantee on that, but I'm pretty sure that the Halo 1 manual said that the sniper had some kind of wicked anti-matter bullets that can pierce through almost anything.kingcom said:Whats the penetration of the Halo sniper rifle? If its not capable of punching tank armour its going to have a tough time doing anything to a marine.Totenkopf said:If the Chief had the Halo-sniper rifle, he would win.
But this way it looks like the Space Marines are superior.
In the novels they describe the energy sword as being able to cut through the titanium plating on starships, so ima say ap 1.orangebandguy said:Astartes.
They make Spartans look like toy soldiers. I don't know the armour penetrating capabilities of an energy sword, but the assault rifle would do very little to Astartes plate.
Strength and agility are completely different things mate. So adding armour makes them tougher, but heavier. So less agile. Regardless of the extra strength, the Chief is still much more agile.blind_dead_mcjones said:funny i thought ultimate showdown of ultimate destiny threads weren't allowed...
irrelevant, as astartes armour is powered (think iron man or fallout powered armour), an astartes is just as agile with the armour as they would be without (in fact they'd probably be more agile as it increases their already progidious strength)
The halo assault rifle uses 7.62x51 mm ammo, which would still be pretty much useless against space marine armour, but the pistol and sword would fair better.Daverson said:From what I gather (I've only played the first Halo, and that was some time ago) the Spartans mainly use an assault rifle with an intermediate caliber (so, something like 5,56x45)
Now, the Astartes equivilent to this would be the the Bolter, a .75 calibre (~20mm) fully automatic gyrojet rifle.
Now, for those who don't know, here's some comparative scaling:
![]()
That little one, that's 5,56 round. That big one, that's a 20mm, the bit to the left is the warhead from that. (it's a gyrojet, to quote Cave Johnson, "plus we shoot the whole bullet, that's 65% more bullet per bullet!")
Uhm ... you're just a wee bit wrong there. And with wee I mean quite a bit, And with quite a bit I mean a considerable amount. I think you get the point.Xixikal said:Chief. He's actually genetically modified.
Space Marines are only elite humans.
Wrong.Xixikal said:Chief. He's actually genetically modified.
Space Marines are only elite humans.
Wrong. Adeptus Astartes is the "official" name of what people colloquially refer to as Space Marines. It's exactly the same thing. What you're confusing is the specialist branches. Chaplain, Librarian and Apothecary are specialist branches of the Astartes. They're still Adeptus Astartes. They're still Space Marines. They're still angels of death. Just specialize in different areas.ChupathingyX said:I just realised that the OP said "astartes".
He never specifically stated "Space Marine", for all we know it could be a Space Marine, Scout, Terminator, Apothecary, Techmarine, Force Commander, Chaplain, Librarian, Devastator or even one of the Primarchs.
All of those are part of the Adeptus Astartes.
space marines are also bio engineered, but assuming you mean MASTERCHEIF and not a random spartan he would either fire the pistol into the eyesocket of the space marine armour if he misses run in with the energy sword and cut him up like sushi.Xixikal said:Chief. He's actually genetically modified.
Space Marines are only elite humans.
yes but im pretty sure this is one tactical marine versus master cheif no? spacemarines fight in big armys whereas spartans fight in groups of 3-6. if it were a group of space marines they would probably win.norwegian-guy said:Astartes fight avatars of dark gods, orc-hordes, eldars, robots bend on ending all life.
Chief fights some religious aliens...
I'm going for the badasses here.
you are thinking of terminator armour. even ork weapons can kill space marines in the games.orangebandguy said:Astartes.
They make Spartans look like toy soldiers. I don't know the armour penetrating capabilities of an energy sword, but the assault rifle would do very little to Astartes plate.
First bit, yes, second bit, no.ScoopMeister said:Strength and agility are completely different things mate. So adding armour makes them tougher, but heavier. So less agile. Regardless of the extra strength, the Chief is still much more agile.