Yeah, no need to drag Spidey down to the crap of the X-Men series.suitepee7 said:i'd rather not have the new spiderman entering the x-men franchise in any way
Wait. Isn't the consumer the only reason we have the Spider-Man and X-Men reboots?bjj hero said:Yay free market capitalism. Where Big business interests trump those of the consumer for the greater bad.
Which is why Spider-Man (Threat or menace?????) would fit in thematically. And really has in the comics.Pinky said:X-Men works best in isolation, the whole "we hate muties ... but superscience and magical superheroes are okay" thing just doesn't work.
I don't know. Loki was still moving after that.cursedseishi said:Agreed. Shorter than even Loki's little spat with The Hulk in Avengers, though the little whining noise Loki makes will be the exact same thing these two studios will make.
Maybe he's looking for a cure to his powers and becomes Man-Spi...That's been done before, hasn't it?FPLOON said:So... Does this mean Spider-Man would not need some "mutant" help in order to take down the pending Sinister Six or something?
The biggest problem is, the MCU, spiderman and F4 movies all are about a few people with spesial powers helping those without any.SilverStuddedSquirre said:Looks good on Paper. Just a few problems though:Fusioncode9 said:I really don't understand why Sony and Fox don't combine their marvel universes. Not only would a Spidey/F4/X-men crossover be huge and probably make Avengers cash, it would also raise awareness for all 3 franchises. Look at what Avengers did for Cap and Thor. Even just a one time crossover film would be a massive win for both studios.
Time travel could solve that. (a bit of a cheap solution, but it has a connection to comic/cartoon)First : everything associated in ANY way with the Current Spider-Man.
Second : you can bet that the new fantastic four will be a giant steaming pile of garbage. Evidence? The first 2.
Third : brilliant casting aside, everything associated with Fox's X-Men franchise is also a steaming pile of Shyte. Not to mention Cyclops is Dead, Jean Grey is Dead, and Wolverine got his claws Neutered. (First class was a great movie, but they've already boned the franchise SO FAR past the point of redemption, that the only way stories work is in the past, or alternate realities - which I thought we were avoiding in the Movie Marvel Verse.)
I do think you are being a bit harsh to some of movies.You forget that Cap and Thor also got respectable stand alone movies, each doing the character individual justice and showing them be Awesome on their own merits, not just cool when you put them next to Hulk or Iron Man.
Removing The Avengers takes away some great moments for each character yes, but they could all still be stand alone movies and be good. None of these heroes have a BAD movie yet. Let's tally up Fox and Sony:
Spider-Man: 2 out of 4 movies are good, looking to go 3/5 ; odds strongly against.
Fantastic-Four: 2 out of 2 movies are shit. Looking for a single good outing here, odds strongly against.
X-Men: 2 out of 5 movies good, looking to go 3/6 ; odds pretty good
All of these franchises struggle to make a 50% record of decent films. So far F-Four has a 100% fail rate.
You can say "two heads are better than one," but when those two heads are Lloyd and Harry from Dumb and Dumber, it won't help you.
William Ossiss said:Why don't we...
Take the movies from Sony and Fox
![]()
and give them back to Marvel?
I read a similar report this morning. At first, I thought it was an actual crossover but the mentioning of characters like Havoc and Stryker, two characters from the X-Men's past, raised a red flag. So, this is more of a cross-promotion instead.LostPause said:http://variety.com/2014/film/news/the-secret-deal-behind-spider-man-2-plugging-the-x-men-exclusive-1201158216/
Seems this was actually just an odd instance of Sony fulfilling a contractual obligation to 'promote' Fox's new X-men movie in exchange for Mark Webb being released to work for them.
Unfortunately the way the rights were sold says that as long as a movie using that property is made every X years the rights will not revert back, it's why a terrible FF movie was made and never released a while back. Marvel won't get the characters back as long as movies keep getting made unless they can buy the studios out of their contracts.LazyAza said:One day the contracts will run out and Spidey and the Xmen will be back in the hands of their rightful owners when it comes to movie rights and this terrifies Sony and Fox because they know damn well these licenses will make Marvel SOOOOO much more money than they could ever dream of making while they have them because Marvel actually knows how to make damn good comic movies.
I wish they would just freaking give up already, sell them back to Marvel and go make other movies they're more qualified for.
Yeah, about that Fantastic 4 reboot?Lizmichi said:X-Men, in my opinion, can stay with Fox for now, but Sony, let Marvel have Peter back. I know a lot of people would like that very much. Besides, a Spiderman/Iron Man snark off would get my ass in a theater seat any day. Anyway, if Marvel really wanted to shut down Sony, and Fox they could buy back the rights if the two knuckle heads will be willing the take the cash, and run. Now, about that Fantastic 4 reboot...
It means there can never be any cross over because no one will share their toys. It is why Martin Osbourne has nothing to do with the Iron Patriot. There will be no Illuminati or Cabal (does anyone else love how Namor sits on both?). No civil war, no Avengers vs X-men, no Spidey and the avengers... I could go on.Zachary Amaranth said:Wait. Isn't the consumer the only reason we have the Spider-Man and X-Men reboots?bjj hero said:Yay free market capitalism. Where Big business interests trump those of the consumer for the greater bad.
Ignoring that, I'd really like to see a list of ways in which this actually harms you. Or anyone else.
Actually with Daredevil they did TRY to make a second movie to keep the rights but the production fell through just before the deadline and the rights defaulted back to Marvel. It was just pure luck in that case. I hear Marvel might try something with Daredevil in one of the upcoming TV series they have planned. So there's that...Jeroenr said:Yeah, about that Fantastic 4 reboot?Lizmichi said:X-Men, in my opinion, can stay with Fox for now, but Sony, let Marvel have Peter back. I know a lot of people would like that very much. Besides, a Spiderman/Iron Man snark off would get my ass in a theater seat any day. Anyway, if Marvel really wanted to shut down Sony, and Fox they could buy back the rights if the two knuckle heads will be willing the take the cash, and run. Now, about that Fantastic 4 reboot...
Is FOX just holding on to that license out of spite?
If this one fails, i don't see FOX doing a trow away movie just to keep the rights again.
If 3 out of 3 bombs, just stop and walk away.
It took only one DareDevil movie to see that it was going nowere.
And why not buy back the rights?
Fox and Sony wouldn't just ask a crazy amount of money, no they would ask all the money. (as a downpayment probably)
Marvel still makes the comics, and the characters still belong to them, but Sony and Fox have the rights to make Spiderman, and X-Man films respectively. These deal predates when Marvel started making their movies in house which saw success with Iron Man 1 in 2008. Ah, the start of a legend in film.Ghadente said:since when are X-men and spiderman not Marvel?
The movies don't even stick to the same continuity in instances where they have all the characters necessary, so I'm not sure why this is any different.bjj hero said:I guess it Doesnt "harm me" but its a real shame and it will be missed by a lot of fans I imagine.