Square Enix Responds to "Racist" Deus Ex Character

Recommended Videos

AdumbroDeus

New member
Feb 26, 2010
268
0
0
mokmoof said:
AdumbroDeus said:
I'm not saying that you personally are racist (well, beyond the most academic sense of the term which is morally neutral it's impossible to discuss modern race issues without being able to see things in terms of race), you merely have no expirience with modern African-American urban culture beyond the "hollywood" version of it that's presented in hip-hop.

The people who do know are the racists.

This is not mistral-speak, this is ebonics. The small similarities are only present because evolution in language resulted in some vestiges remaining in the modern language.

Why is this sickening? Because this is yet another example of people attacking ebonics, classifying it as uneducated and uncouth and implicitly classifying everyone who uses it as such.

What makes it even worse is that this time, they suckered a bunch of well-meaning people who merely were unfamiliar with the culture of modern urban centers into protesting in favor of this view that ebonics means the speaker is uneducated in order to cement it into the popular consciousness, when it is clearly false.

That is tragic and sickening.
Six things:

1. Not to be a stickler, but "racist" does not mean "seeing things in terms of race." According to the Oxford English Dictionary, racism is "the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics, abilities, or qualities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races." To see race as a social and historical circumstance is not the same thing as ascribing intrinsic characteristics or innate superiority to people based upon their racial backgrounds. To talk about race, then, is not an automatically racist pursuit.

2. How you can presume to know what personal experience I have "with modern African-American urban culture" is totally beyond me--unless you're assuming that anyone who disagrees with you must simply lack the wisdom and experience necessary to agree with you.

3. You've yet to explain how exactly "Hollywood" enters into this conversation.

4. As I said, it's entirely possible that some real people sound more or less like Latisha. I've never met one, and I've met plenty of people who speak in what could reasonably be called Ebonics and who sound nothing like Latisha, but the black people whom I happen to know do not somehow represent the Platonic ideal of all black people as such--nor do those whom you happen to know. For someone going on about diversity, you seem to be pretty convinced that there is an absolute linguistic sameness among all black people who live in all cities everywhere.

5. As succinctly as possible: To question the specific way that Latisha talks (even if that manner of speaking is indeed a subset of Ebonics) is absolutely not an attack on the whole of Ebonics, which is in any case a linguistically imperfect category that refers to lots and lots of different ways of speaking, rather than some cohesive, unified, downtrodden mono-accent.

6. It is baffling to me that you would be so offended by a perceived attack on Ebonics (because you see it as an attack on a racial minority), and yet see nothing at all wrong with perpetuating racist character cliches (which historically have constituted an attack on racial minorities).
1. Hence "the most academic sense". Academics define technical terms differently then average people do for the purpose of effectively examining things, just like engineers do.

2. Because your argument doesn't attempt to explain individuals who DO use that variant of the english language. It just assumes that this based entirely on mistral-speak.

3. I'm equating knowing about urban african-american culture from hip-hop to knowing any other culture solely through hollywood. Pop culture is not the same as culture and any representation gleaned from it will be grossly inaccurate.

4. You're drawing a conclusion that I never stated. There are substantial linguistic variances based on regions and even within regions. That said, her language is distinctly identifiable as ebonics.

5. Because every commentary on ebonics follows this exact same assertion, that it is uneducated and uncouth. This attempts to differentiate itself by saying that it bears a resemblance to mistral-speak which is passing at best.

6. Because it's NOT a racist cliche, it's a normal homeless person with a normal way of speaking for that area that follows normal patterns of behavior. If this was the only context that African-Americans were presented in within the story then it would be suggesting that all african-americans were homeless with all that implies. As best I can tell, it doesn't, so she's within acceptable variation of characters within the game.


When you suggest that she as a singular character by her speech pattern perpetuates African-American steriotypes by speaking in ebonics, then it becomes an attack on the vocal pattern and in turn an attack on African-Americans as a racial minority.
 

PhoenixVanguard

New member
Aug 28, 2010
25
0
0
Mister Linton said:
So REAL PEOPLE who talk like Letitia are actually a racist depiction? Someone should go tell them.

If my wife eats a meal of fried chicken and waffles with some watermelon for desert, is she actually being racist against black people whether she knows it or not? I'll explain this asinine theory of yours to my in-laws just to get their hilarious reaction. Thanks for the laugh.
Yes, we get it, you have a black wife. You should subtly work that into your argument more to add validity. Subtly. Subtlety. Subtle. Be more subtle. Really.

But back to the the point, I think someone already made this argument, let me find the quote...oh yes, here it is.

PhoenixVanguard said:
I'd just like to clarify something to those dozens upon dozens of you using the defense that essentially boils down to, "Well I know people who actually talk this way so it's not racist." This argument does not in ANY way, shape, or form qualify something as not being a racist stereotype. Stereotypes emerge BECAUSE there are a large number of people fitting the given epithet. What, do you think people make up random character qualities about a group of people and then HOPE they come true so they can all laugh at it later? Really now. Lots of people from all races enjoy fried chicken and watermelon, are good with math, and try hard to save money, but that doesn't mean that these aren't stereotypes aimed at SPECIFIC groups of people. Please, please, PLEASE stop making this ridiculous counter argument. It's utterly baffling to me.
So to review...again...stereotypes are GROUNDED in reality, so no, the fact that they are sometimes real doesn't counter the argument. If anything, It only supplements it. Going further...fulfilling limited number of characteristics within a stereotype does not instantly make one a stereotype, no. But being a cut and paste caricature of a very old, frequently repeated racial epithet is worth examining, yes. I don't think I'll bother repeating this again...this thread is long enough with responding to the same silly argument ad nauseum. So if anyone else is going to quote me and I don't respond, just assume what you;re saying is irrelevant and has already been addressed at some point.

I'll leave you all with this. Study hard; http://racerelations.about.com/od/understandingrac1/a/WhatIsaStereotype.htm
 

Mister Linton

New member
Mar 11, 2011
153
0
0
PhoenixVanguard said:
[So to review...again...stereotypes are GROUNDED in reality, so no, the fact that they are sometimes real doesn't counter the argument. If anything, It only supplements it. Going further...fulfilling limited number of characteristics within a stereotype does not instantly make one a stereotype, no. But being a cut and paste caricature of a very old, frequently repeated racial epithet is worth examining, yes. I don't think I'll bother repeating this again...this thread is long enough with responding to the same silly argument ad nauseum. So if anyone else is going to quote me and I don't respond, just assume what you;re saying is irrelevant and has already been addressed at some point.
Obviously missed my point entirely. A single instance of a dialect in a game with many characters of multiple ethnicities DOES NOT FIT THE DEFINITION OF A RACIST STEREOTYPE. Because it is ONE character. Among MANY. Like the REAL WORLD. If all black characters in the game spoke a certain way or behaved in some sort of negative fashion, there might be an argument that the creators were making a statement.

Eidos addressed this and their point was spot on: the game represents a VERY diverse cast and does not assign ANY blanket stereotypes to any of those groups. Letitia does not exist in a vacuum and any ONE person speaking a certain way CANNOT be a stereotype.

So thick.
 

TwilightVulpine

New member
Nov 5, 2010
4
0
0
How many black people there are in Deus Ex: HR?

Do most of them act stereotypically? If they do, it's a problem. If not, it isn't.
 

mokmoof

New member
Apr 8, 2010
11
0
0
AdumbroDeus said:
Your argument doesn't attempt to explain individuals who DO use that variant of the english language. It just assumes that this based entirely on mistral-speak.
My argument doesn't "assume" any such thing. We've all seen the clip of Latisha, and I provided a clip of an archetypal mammy talking in a very similar way. If you don't see the similarity, then fair enough, but there's no assumption there. Just juxtaposition.

As I've said multiple times now, how people talk in everyday life is not in any way the point. The point is that it's loaded to make a subservient black character, of low socioeconomic status, talk that way in a movie or a game.

You're responding angrily to an argument I'm not even making--no one has ever sounded anything like Latisha, and anyone who did would sound stupid--and ignoring the argument I am actually making: Latisha's speech sounds rather close to a specific tradition of black characters whose functions were essentially racist.

AdumbroDeus said:
I'm equating knowing about urban african-american culture from hip-hop to knowing any other culture solely through hollywood. Pop culture is not the same as culture and any representation gleaned from it will be grossly inaccurate.
I now understand what you're saying, but I still don't see how it applies to what we're talking about. The very fact that you and I are having a literate conversation about minstrelsy (among other things) demonstrates that neither of us is getting our information about black people exclusively from hip-hop, or about other cultures exclusively through Hollywood, or whatever.

AdumbroDeus said:
Because every commentary on ebonics follows this exact same assertion, that it is uneducated and uncouth. This attempts to differentiate itself by saying that it bears a resemblance to mistral-speak which is passing at best.
I offered an example that sounds quite similar to Latisha. You have not done that so far. I'm not asking you to take my word for it here. I'm putting two things next to each other and explaining why I think they're similar.

Also, I'm not willing to accept that Latisha's manner of speaking "is distinctly identifiable as Ebonics" with no supporting evidence of any kind. I'm not a linguist, and I'm assuming that you're not, either, so give me some examples of Ebonics that sound like Latisha--YouTube's good for that kind of thing--or link me to an article explaining why what sounds to me (and to plenty of others) like minstrelsy actually isn't. The burden of proof is on you, as far as that goes.

AdumbroDeus said:
Because it's NOT a racist cliche, it's a normal homeless person with a normal way of speaking for that area that follows normal patterns of behavior. If this was the only context that African-Americans were presented in within the story then it would be suggesting that all african-americans were homeless with all that implies. As best I can tell, it doesn't, so she's within acceptable variation of characters within the game.
The issue is not "suggesting that all African-Americans [are] homeless" in the world of the game. Who said that? Again with the responding to an argument I never even made.

AdumbroDeus said:
When you suggest that she as a singular character by her speech pattern perpetuates African-American steriotypes by speaking in ebonics, then it becomes an attack on the vocal pattern and in turn an attack on African-Americans as a racial minority.
And again with the arguing about something way, way over yonder. I never said Ebonics = Sterotypes = Latisha, and the reason I never said that is that that would be a stupid thing to say.

I've explained why Latisha strikes me as a racial caricature. Your only counter-argument seems to be but that's what homeless black people are really like. To which I can only respond:

1. Seriously? Regardless of whether or not you find her racist (I know that you don't), you don't find Latisha at all over-the-top or wacky? She just strikes you as a reasonable, balanced portrayal of a homeless black woman?

2. Latisha does align neatly with the trope of the helpful, subservient, non-threateningly sassy black female. No argument I have made here is concerned with how closely that trope does or does not align with the circumstances of real people. You knowing a homeless lady who talks and acts just like Latisha (or whatever) is irrelevant. Even if you were right about every single thing you're saying, the choices that Edios made with Latisha would still be really loaded in a way they, the developers, clearly didn't intend or understand when they made those choices.
 

ORLOFT

New member
Apr 29, 2009
67
0
0
Is it really that terrible? I've put about 20 hours into that game and, though not all of the voice acting is "good", I find most of it effective. Am I so tone deaf? :-/
 

PhoenixVanguard

New member
Aug 28, 2010
25
0
0
Mister Linton said:
Obviously missed my point entirely. A single instance of a dialect in a game with many characters of multiple ethnicities DOES NOT FIT THE DEFINITION OF A RACIST STEREOTYPE. Because it is ONE character. Among MANY. Like the REAL WORLD. If all black characters in the game spoke a certain way or behaved in some sort of negative fashion, there might be an argument that the creators were making a statement.

Eidos addressed this and their point was spot on: the game represents a VERY diverse cast and does not assign ANY blanket stereotypes to any of those groups. Letitia does not exist in a vacuum and any ONE person speaking a certain way CANNOT be a stereotype.

So thick.
Actually, I think you've missed the point of everything I've said, mokmoof continues to say, and it looks like you didn't even read the original Narcisse article at all. No one's saying anyone at Square or Eidos is trying to make an intentionally racist statement. And no one's saying the entire game or any other character in it is racist (Okay, I AM saying Hengsha's a little racist, but I digress). In fact, Narcisse goes out of his way to say the character is so out of place in an otherwise well put together game that she's almost alien. The ENTIRE argument being made is that this character is a jarring example of an old racist stereotype in the game. And yes, one person CAN be an example of a racist stereotype. Direct quote from the article;

"I can't imagine anything Eidos Montreal would say that would make the existence of Letitia understandable. The problem generally tends to be one of under-representation. If there's only one black character in a game and he acts in wince-inducing fashion, then your construction of that character's going to be called into question.

But that's not to say that there's a magic algorithm that diffuses upset. Jenny Alexander?Adam Jensen's old police buddy?speaks in full, understandable sentences and she's apparently black. Even if there were five noble, upstanding black characters, it wouldn't make one insulting persona okay. Because the insulting one still isn't a human being.

Some people reading this might counter with, "Ok, fine, Letitia's just a poorly drawn character. What's the harm in that? Weak character construction isn't racist." But it's what this particular weak character construction draws on that makes it so appalling. Making her a black, jive-talking street person echoes decades of racist imagery about poor African-Americans."

Before you respond with the same thing everyone's been saying again and again and taking it on a personal level, read the article in full, look up the black face minstrel behavior he says it's alluding to, and make a genuinely informed statement related to the argument that anyone is actually making.

If you can't make a well reasoned counterpoint to pick apart any similarities between the two, then you don't have an argument. At least not one to the point being presented. That's all there is to it.
 

Blind Sight

New member
May 16, 2010
1,657
0
0
I don't really have an issue with this in a racial context, but I sure as hell have a problem with it from a voice acting and dialogue perspective, as you stated. I mean, come on, this is clearly something that could have been handled far better. I mean, everything she says seems lazily written and poorly performed. Trash Lady indeed.

It's really just silly and draws you out of the experience, that's all. Hell, you want to see better done, lower class black characters L.A. Noire does a great job (they have the benefit of better actors though).

Captcha: What the hell is an omega symbol doing there?!?
 

Escapefromwhatever

New member
Feb 21, 2009
2,368
0
0
Ghengis John said:
Okay, so an easily offended lack man was just offended.
FREUDIAN SLIP!

I'm just amazed that in a game as hyped and followed as this was, Squeenix didn't have someone catch this and say "You know, this may border the line of racial caricature too much. Probably best not to put it in the game." I'm not saying that they don't have the right to put it in, but what was the point of it?

I will say, though, that I am surprised that this gets press attention while "THE COLE TRAIN" is allowed to continue being AWFUL.
 

Escapefromwhatever

New member
Feb 21, 2009
2,368
0
0
Ghengis John said:
SuperMse said:
Ghengis John said:
Okay, so an easily offended lack man was just offended.
FREUDIAN SLIP!
I may not be as perverted so I don't get it... zur?
It wasn't a sexual comment at all. As much as Freud focused on sex, the term "Freudian slip" can be applied to a multitude of topics. Anyway, I found it amusing that you called a black man a "lack man." There are so many different ways to interpret that, and all of them are offensive. That is not to say that you are being racist, but rather me jokingly calling you out on a typo that denotes a feeling that black people are inferior. It's in such a fitting topic, too.
 

FamoFunk

Dad, I'm in space.
Mar 10, 2010
2,626
0
0
Stilkon said:
The first time I talked to her, I thought "Wow, a transsexual character! What a nice touch of diversity!"
Never played the game, but after that YouTube clip, I thought the same xD

I think I'd be more concerned about how awful the Blokes voice is, it's really, really bad lol
 

Xaositect

New member
Mar 6, 2008
452
0
0
Ive tried to write a number of different responses to this, but Ive given up.

Now Im just left wondering if this PC fascism and self-hating guilt mongering by left wing nutcases is a uniquely western sickness, or if you can find these people no matter the country they live in.

Since every "race" has a past history of crimes longer than anyone can read, do they have sad pathetic individuals looking to link it to every unrelated modern day excuse they can find.

Its a poorly voice character. Every sane, non-pc liberal agenda obsessed person will most likely view it thay way. To those who are fabricating a racist issue out of this: thats your own fucking problem. Stop forcing it on other people who can play this game without trying to guilt trip themselves or others over the smallest fucking things, and dont need you people to do it for them.
 

hooksashands

New member
Apr 11, 2010
550
0
0
Thedek said:
hooksashands said:
Thedek said:
hooksashands said:
I'm going to Kentucky tomorrow and pretty much everyone from around there talks like this, black and white.
That kind of depends on the area. May be in eastern KY but it ain't in western. We still have accents but they aren't quite to THAT level.
Nonsense, my friend. I've only been here three days and already heard someone use 'hootenanny', plus you all seem to enjoy crawfish like it's going out of style. Stereotypical? Yes. Offensive? Only if you accept it like I'm trying to be mean.
I don't take it offensive. I just question the validity is all.

Granted I use the word "reckon" I great deal. So I'm not saying I'm exempt or nothing. I would think crawdad's are like shrimp and I don't much care for those. You sure you aren't thinking about cajuns? Granted there ain't much a canjun WON'T eat.
Mm mm cajuns. You're making me hungry. I can't speak for the vadility, it was one of those conversations you hear over in the next booth at a restaurant... but I could swear the lady said 'Don't you bring up that hootenanny.'

I reckon the problem is: People have been misled to think the way someone talks gives away all you need to know about them, when it really doesn't. Letitia's voice is somewhat over-the-top, yes, but I really can't pinpoint anything about her character that stands out as stereotypical. The fact that she is a stranger in the street having a perfectly friendly conversation does put me on edge though.
 

Apophenia Overload

New member
Nov 24, 2009
12
0
0
I'm pretty tired that whenever someone points out something in a game is tasteless, or questionable, or appalling, there's legions of reflexively anti-political correctness players who shout it down with "it's just a game, it's no big deal." Yet they're probably the ones qq-ing the most whenever ol' Ebert doesn't consider their precious Bioshock or Portal as art.

If you're going to claim that video games are art, then you're going to have to take some level of responsibility in terms of taste. That means dealing with accusations of racism. That means reexamining portrayals of people in games. If you can't deal with it, if all you're going to do is shout ad hominems, then get your ass back to Tetris and quit claiming that video games is a legitimate medium.

This is more or less directed to all of the uppity players who can't take some social commentary.
 

Mausthemighty

New member
Aug 3, 2011
163
0
0
I'm offended that they included such a stupid character in the game. This is the Deus Ex equivalent of Jar Jar Binks.
 

Atmos Duality

New member
Mar 3, 2010
8,470
0
0
And the shit-pot continues to stir...and stir...and stir...
Be careful not to shake it though. You don't want that on your shoes, do you?

People will play the race-card at the drop of a hat. Especially if they're lashing out against anything popular or critically acclaimed.
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,908
0
0
AdumbroDeus said:
[
What are you talking about? The fact is the vast majority of roles in cinema no asian american male will ever have a chance in, because those of very specific roles. Even when we're talking about comedic actors or action heroes, there are so few roles given to them that it no way makes of for roles they can never receive.


Furthermore, you're missing the bigger, but implicit point. OTHERNESS. Asian Americans are no perceived as american, they are perceived as exotic, and therefore suitable for roles of mystical martial artists, or sources of amusement through wacky cultural hijinks (which bridged somewhat into them being acceptable in other wacky roles).

While I was talking about male leads, there are other roles written, notice that when something is set in america or with Americans asians are almost never americans, they're always foreign tourists. There is another steriotype for female asians, various "exotic" love interests. Furthermore, supporting actors like in lost have their own steriotypes, but they're incredibly rare in cinema and emphasize the otherness (granted, the other asian-american in lost was an exception, but an incredibly rare exception).

Also, ever wonder why asian males (including leads) almost never get the girl in the end?



Here's the thing though, it isn't so much that asians aren't commonly in cinema, it's that they're signifigantly less common then their percentage of the population would suggest. Are 4.8% of roles in movies taken by asian americans?

This is especially true when you consider that asian americans are concentrated on the coasts, and especially the west coast asian americans have been here for generations and have fully assimilated, so go into the arts in comparable rates. Since the coasts, especially the west coast is so dominant compared to the american heartland one would expect that asian americans would have at least a comparable percentage in movie parts, but that's not true.


And bringing it back to the movie 21, the story that it was based on was about asian americans and their ethnicity played a significant role in why the scam worked (playing on the racism of the casino owners), but the execs decided to rewrite the roles as white, why? They felt it would be more marketable. If that doesn't tell the story nothing does.



.
I apparently missed some messages I received a few days ago. Apologies.

The problem with your arguement is that you have to keep adding exceptions and exemptions to try and make it, because there is no real case to it. You talk about asians who don't play martial artists or geniuses or do comedy, I give examples and that apparently doesn't count. Then you go on about the lack of such characters but at the same time you also want to exempt anything that is a meaningful role because it involves martial arts, comedy, or some kind of technical skill.

To be blunt most of the so called "stereotypes" you mention with Asians apply to pretty much everyone nowadays, it's just that a pattern is being sought where one doesn't exist. Today pretty much everyone who fights seriously has some form of martial arts in there. Most white/black/etc... action heroes are also martial arts masters. The technical genius is again a stock role, there are plenty of people from other ethnicities that play those roles too, and comedy is likewise popular, and DOES include self-depreciating white people which is how guys like "Jeff Foxworthy", and "Larry The Cable Guy" have made their careers.

Likewise a "we are the world" approach to film making isn't going to work, largely because to meet that objective EVERY film is going to have to involve every group you can think of somewhere in the movie, which is going to lead to messes of irrelevent characters.

The truth is simply that you seem to be "noticing" things that aren't really present, and making a case based around a pattern that doesn't exist. All of the types of roles you mention are integral to enterainment in general and played by members of all ethnicities, asians playing them just means that they have a prescence in the media in general.

As far as an Asian guy getting the girl, it largely depends on the movie, in your typical action movie with an Asian protaganist, yeah he's going to get the girl at the end unless there is supposed to be some tradgedy involved. Of course your dismissing this because like every action hero the protaganist is likely to do some form of martial arts, or engage in nearly supernatural feats of gunplay (let's not forget the whole John Woo thing here while we're at it, you have to call that a stereotype too... since everything is a stereotype in something as derivitive as modern movie making).

I'll also mention one other point, members of the Chinese police, military, and intelligence services are generally trained in something called "Wu Shu" or "War Arts" which is a kind of hybridized kung-fu. Tai-Chi is also the official exercise program of China. If your dealing with a movie involving some guy from China (the most dominant ethnicity) the odds are pretty substantial that he at least has SOME knowlege of martial arts, in a MOVIE where this guy is supposed to be a hero/villain/etc.. he's going to be REALLY good at that as opposed to a more "well, yeah I've done Tai Chi in school as part of phys ed.". There is some truth to this stereotype.

Now to be honest, your correct that not all Chinese are going to have the benefits of their educational system or be a member of their services. The reality of course being that the majority of people from China are uneducated factory workers and farmers who are pretty badly abused overall, China being a country with huge, modern cities that they show the world, and places where they might as well still be in The Middle Ages, and everything in between. This is a place that has a great educational system for the elite, but makes it's money off sweatshop labour, and where diseases like SARS got started due to people living with their livestock.

The thing is that if you start pulling out THOSE examples of the Chinese (the most common culture/ethnicity) it's going to be viewed as even more racist, even is 100% accurate. Such characters DO show up in movies, albiet in the capacity that they do IRL... being victimized, either by human traffickers, or in their lifestyle overseas. It's noteworthy that the US is focusing on the BEST aspects of asian culture, if we started casting a lot of chinese characters as some most likely diseased moron, knee deep in rice paddies, or hunched over some kind of decades over manufacturing device... I don't think many people are going to consider that an improvement.

As far as the "exotic" appeal goes, well you are dealing with a minority in the Western market. The same can be said for whites (especially blondes) in other parts of the world including Asia. Overall whites are one of the smaller ethnic minorities globally. The women always get more attention/credit in foreign cultures, white guys tend not to fare all that well in say Anime and domestic Japanese cinema the same way.

One problem with Asians in general, which also applies to a lot of minorities in the US, is that we don't push force intergration and adaption into society. We wind up with situations where immigrants come into the US, form their own little communities, and then live like they did in the country they came from. Chinatown, Little Seoul, Little Italy, and numerous others all represent this problem. The result is that when you see people from domestic closed cultures dealing with the majority there are problems. I'm one of those people who has been argueing for pushing itergration and getting people who come to the US to join mainstream American culture or get out... for a lot of reasons. Truthfully though the US allows things that most countries won't, and doesn't handle immigration very well, I think a lot of the problems in the US with minorities are caused by the minorities. After all, if some guy can come into the US, move into a community of people like him, and not learn the language or whatever and do everything there, it's not surprising that there are problems when the rest of the country has to deal with them. Of course how to force integration (for those who believe in it) is a big issue. To be honest I don't think there is a big problem in the media along the lines of what your talking about, but what tiny grain of truth there is will be be gradually dealt with. After all it's things like self-created "Chinatown districts" that cause the "amusing" culture problems and ignorance that become fodder for some jokes. The truth be told you have a lot of people who live in ethnic communities who really have no idea what is going on in the country outside of their own little region. This was an issue back in the 1990s with Bill Clinton where one of his minor scandals (post second election) was that he exploited minority media and mono-lingual communities by paying to have outright lies printed in local, foreign language newspapers, the kind of stuff that would be easily dealt with by listening to the general news or radio, but people in say Chinatown couldn't understand it, many of them being mono-lingual Chinese, or having very bad english and
not really caring to check out such things. Of course the Clinton campaign claimed it was bad reporting from local papers and such, and the complaint disappeared especially seeing as it was mentioned when the election was over, but it kind of illustrates a problem. Al Gore also exploited something similar (though not identical) by accepting money for his campaign from the Chinese goverment that was fronted through Buddhist temples, and it took a long time to notice, again because it was a closed domestic culture.
 

Mister Linton

New member
Mar 11, 2011
153
0
0
PhoenixVanguard said:
If you can't make a well reasoned counterpoint to pick apart any similarities between the two, then you don't have an argument. At least not one to the point being presented. That's all there is to it.
Btw, THIS is the voice actress behind Letitia.
Yeah, very racist, I know...