Stan Lee Media Suing Founder and Namesake, Stan Lee

Scott Bullock

New member
Nov 11, 2010
1,063
0
0
Stan Lee Media Suing Founder and Namesake, Stan Lee

Years after the fact, Stan Lee Media Inc. is finally going to get its chance to sue comics legend Stan Lee for improperly transferring rights to his characters.

In an attempt to wrangle back control of many of Lee's characters, Stan Lee Media Inc. has submitted a complaint to the court, claiming to be the rightful owner of the characters currently controlled by Marvel.

The trouble started in 1998, which is when Stan Lee Media Inc. claims Lee transferred ownership of his characters to his company. When the company declared bankruptcy in 2000 Lee moved ownership from it to his other companies, POW! Entertainment and QED Productions.

Eventually, the characters ended up in Marvel's (and by extension, Disney's) hands due to a settlement between Marvel and Lee, and have been there for several years. Marvel has made several movies using the contested characters so losing them would be a heavy blow to the company.

And it is here that the tangled web of lawsuits and bankruptcies gets confusing. Stan Lee Media Inc. was originally a subsidiary of Stan Lee Media (no Inc.), which went bankrupt. Stan Lee Media Inc. argues that all property rights then transferred to the subsidiary company, including the characters signed over by Stan Lee himself in 1998 that were moved to POW! Entertainment, QED Productions, and Marvel. It also contends that Lee signed over all his characters, not just those he created while at Stan Lee Media, and so the characters Marvel currently owns are also at risk.

Finally, after years of bickering, failed lawsuits, and bankruptcies, Stan Lee Media Inc. has gotten the go-ahead from California Federal Judge Stephen Wilson to pursue a lawsuit against Stan Lee, POW! Entertainment, and QED Productions. Oddly, Marvel (and parent company Disney) have been left out of the list of defendants in the suit. I guess I wouldn't want to have to contend with Disney's lawyers, either.

Source: The Hollywood Reporter [http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/stan-lee-media-stan-lee-100268]

Image [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Stantheman.jpg]


Permalink
 

FogHornG36

New member
Jan 29, 2011
649
0
0
oh and you think Stan Lee will be alive long enough to see the end of this? what is he 90 something?
 

Lillowh

New member
Oct 22, 2007
255
0
0
So rich get richer poor get poorer, and People sue over things that are dumb. I really don't see the significance of this case other than it seems that Stan Lee Media Inc. is greed and also a pansy for not including marvel on the list because if they did they know they would lose. And from my point of view it sounds like they should.
 

KeyMaster45

Gone Gonzo
Jun 16, 2008
2,846
0
0
Even though Disney and Marvel aren't mentioned in the suit you can bet your bottom that now Disney owns Marvel they will unleash their unholy army of lawyers on these people.
 

esperandote

New member
Feb 25, 2009
3,605
0
0
They need to win the lawsuit against those other companies in order to set precedent and stand a chance against disney.
 

SaintWaldo

Interzone Vagabond
Jun 10, 2008
923
0
0
Go back to 28 years from date of publication for length of copyright. This whole thing goes away.

Fuck any fallout. If we could handle the Civil War over the moral question of US slavery, we can take the hit over releasing human culture from the bonds of RENT, easily.

It would be TOTALLY worth it to avoid this level of ABSOLUTE ABSURDITY ever occurring again.
 

Ossian

New member
Mar 11, 2010
669
0
0
This is Bullcrap, Stan lee made these characters, I don't care what pieces of paper say, HE MADE THEM.
This company wouldn't exist without him his name is their company's name, this is the epitome of corruption in this world.
 

Bretty

New member
Jul 15, 2008
864
0
0
This is what is going to happen. Disney provides Stan with all the Law support he needs. They aren't stupid.
 

Sonicron

Do the buttwalk!
Mar 11, 2009
5,133
0
0
Oh, come on. If rights are transferred as a result of this legal action, the consumer will be the biggest loser once again, because this shit always leads to most - if not all - shows, comics etc connected to said action being cancelled, leaving a pile of stuff unresolved forever.
For example, I do not want the new Avengers show to be killed halfway in. I will murder someone if that happens.
 

Upbeat Zombie

New member
Jun 29, 2010
405
0
0
This just sounds stupid, there suing the man who is the name of their company. Besides he's the one who made the characters to begin with.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
FogHornG36 said:
oh and you think Stan Lee will be alive long enough to see the end of this? what is he 90 something?
He was bit by a radioactive publisher. He'll live forever.
 

manythings

New member
Nov 7, 2009
3,297
0
0
FogHornG36 said:
oh and you think Stan Lee will be alive long enough to see the end of this? what is he 90 something?
I could be wrong but hasn't he had cancer? Do the plan on just stealing his will?
 

Red Right Hand

Squatter
Feb 23, 2009
1,093
0
0
I'm confused but moreso disgusted. Suing the man who's name is in your fucking title!? Seems a bit mutinous does it not?