There was, for a time, a subset if the 360 community who owned them specifically for the synched Netflix parties and ability to converse in the Xbox Live party chat.undeadsuitor said:what the fuck would you use a gaming console for other than gaming?Aerosteam said:Just because someone owns a gaming console doesn't mean they use it for gaming.
I mean, I know some consoles run hot enough to cook an egg on but just because girls own consoles doesnt mean theyre cooking on them exactly.
This is just more pointless goal post shifting.
There's a handheld version of the genesis, called the nomad in Europe (not sure what the call it elsewhere, seeing how we got MegaDrive instead of Genesis)Dreiko said:Apparently this study cited psp and sega genesis as examples of portables. It doesn't look like they know what they're saying all that much.
Also you must kinda differentiate between owning a console and actually using the console that you own. I own a ps1 but I haven't used the thing in like 15 years. I could see this being the case with some people and their reporting of their "sega genesis" lol.
But yes obviously women own consoles, nobody's saying they don't I don't think. People are just saying the statistic about the gamer population being 50% female is misleading. It's not something directly tied to console ownership.
You can get little Smart boxes for your TV around 80-100 that do most of that except for DVDs. You can get a DVD player at thrift shops for 10 bucks or less fairly consistently, so probably cheaper.Corey Schaff said:I used to/still use my consoles for things like playing music, watching dvds/blurays, and have used my PS4 to play youtube videos and even been considering getting a netflix subscription through it <.<
I don't know whether it'd be more economical to purchase those devices separately if you didn't plan to use the console for gaming, but it'd certainly save some space.
Smartphone Owners More Likely to be Younger, More Affluent and Highly Educated
Wow, people with more money more likely to buy expensive things. Also, I know plenty of old people and dumb people that own tablets and smartphones.Tablet Owners More Likely to be Younger, More Affluent and Highly Educated
Dude, my mom plays an MMO almost exclusively, and it's only available on PC's. My girlfriend goes hard on anything that kills you for screwing up by single pixels. I'm well aware how much women can game. Thing is, both of them are on PC. Most of my friends are exclusively PC. And most of them converted to it as their primary gaming device because consoles were too limiting for what they were interested in. Guy's got rid of them, because they could get the same games on the PC. Girls kept them because they couldn't. This is just the general thing that happened, nothing else.undeadsuitor said:But all these things were still in ADDITION to playing games.
I think it's just dishonest for a lot of people to go "well, if 50% of gamers are women then they must be using phones!"
and then when proven that it applies to consoles too, immediately switch to "well I bet they dont even game on their gaming consoles!"
there's just no amount of information that will satisfy some people when it comes to proving how much women game
When the PS3 first came out it was the cheapest blu-ray player on the market, there are reasons, though I doubt anyone with a ps4 or xb1 would fall into these scenarios as there are cheaper options for the non gaming functions those consoles haveundeadsuitor said:what the fuck would you use a gaming console for other than gaming?Aerosteam said:Just because someone owns a gaming console doesn't mean they use it for gaming.
I mean, I know some consoles run hot enough to cook an egg on but just because girls own consoles doesnt mean theyre cooking on them exactly.
This is just more pointless goal post shifting.
Nobody spoke specifically about women though. This study sure doesn't. This study speaks both about men and women and BOTH of these groups seem to be misrepresented due to the faulty methodology. You're focusing on the ramifications the study has about women but if you go there and look it doesn't seem to focus on women. It presents both sexes as equally relevant. It just so happens that this wrong methodology has as a result something that you like. It's what we call confirmation bias.erttheking said:Technically true. But one thing that always drove me crazy is objections like that, while perfectly logical, only ever seem to get brought up when talking about how many women game. When it's just men you never see arguments like that. And it just drives me insane.Dreiko said:Snip
Hell if I know man...hell if I know. I just overlook it because there's no other indicator that the data is faulty. You see anything major that points to that, just let me know and I'll eat my words.
Actually that makes more sense than you might think at first sight, considering how pathetically the PS Vita is doing. People who played handheld are five times more likely to own a PSP rather than a PS Vita (Rounding down, 10 million Vitas have been sold while 50 million PSPs have been sold). Hell, my best friend has that set up going.
The survey isn't even a survey about women. It's a survey about both sexes. The topic here was just focused on the women-aspect but the actual study isn't all about women so to tackle it's methodology isn't an indirect method of claiming this or that about women, either, since the study's methodology doesn't only speak about women but it speaks about men too. I think a whole lot of confirmation bias makes people reluctant to think critically here.Worgen said:I like how quickly this thread went right to the whole "fake gamer girl" thing without actually calling that. Is there anything that guys get called "fake" for?
It's pretty easy to see with most posters doubting the data or suggesting that just because one owns a console, doesn't mean they use it for gaming. It's just another way of saying "fake gamer girls."Corey Schaff said:I'm not seeing it. But if you want the more universal concept outside of gaming, try "Poseur". You'll find lots of examples.Worgen said:I like how quickly this thread went right to the whole "fake gamer girl" thing without actually calling that. Is there anything that guys get called "fake" for?
Please tell me you bought this PS4 via use of a time machine from some 15th century market.Phasmal said:This does remind me though, when I bought my PS4, the bloke serving me looked confusedly over at my boyfriend (while I was paying for it) and said slowly "So... this is for... you then?". Pfft. Nope.
The PS3 was one of the highest rated BD players for years, cost less than competitors, and had a lot of features on top. It did eventually lose steam to dedicated BD players, but at one point Sony was actually bragging about this. The PS2 was simlarly sold on its DVD capacities, and the PS1 on CD capabilities. Hell, media features were one of the reasons I ended up with a PS2 and a PS3, though I also planned on games for both consoles so I'm not exactly in the "non-gaming" market.undeadsuitor said:what the fuck would you use a gaming console for other than gaming?
Well, these studies are very rarely done specifically to prove such a thing. They're usually done for purposes of marketing and basic demographic information. I doubt Pew is specifically setting out to prove women play games, for example. This sort of gender breakdown is nothing new, and definitely predates the gamer gatekeepers. Or gamers as a whole, really, as research like this dates back to before gaming was a thing (though they were likely weighted quite different).Rebel_Raven said:It's a shame we have to keep doing these studies to show women are valid gamers, even though the gate keepers of gaming will not likely believe the studies anyhow.
Worgen said:It's pretty easy to see with most posters doubting the data or suggesting that just because one owns a console, doesn't mean they use it for gaming. It's just another way of saying "fake gamer girls."Corey Schaff said:I'm not seeing it. But if you want the more universal concept outside of gaming, try "Poseur". You'll find lots of examples.Worgen said:I like how quickly this thread went right to the whole "fake gamer girl" thing without actually calling that. Is there anything that guys get called "fake" for?
Something Amyss said:True, these studies aren't generally done just to say women game, but these are used to show such to counter arguments to keep certain demographics away from being marketed to.Phasmal said:Well, these studies are very rarely done specifically to prove such a thing. They're usually done for purposes of marketing and basic demographic information. I doubt Pew is specifically setting out to prove women play games, for example. This sort of gender breakdown is nothing new, and definitely predates the gamer gatekeepers. Or gamers as a whole, really, as research like this dates back to before gaming was a thing (though they were likely weighted quite different).Rebel_Raven said:It's a shame we have to keep doing these studies to show women are valid gamers, even though the gate keepers of gaming will not likely believe the studies anyhow.
Yeah, and that really is a shame. It's somewhat heartening though that research and marketing groups treat it as the norm, though. It means the protests are likely in vain.Rebel_Raven said:True, these studies aren't generally done just to say women game, but these are used to show such to counter arguments to keep certain demographics away from being marketed to.
except that noone is claiming that women are not valid gamers, nor owning a console makes you a gamer. being a gamer requires gaming to be your hobby, and this is definitely not true for all consoles owners. some console owners i know haven't even played a single game on them.Rebel_Raven said:It's a shame we have to keep doing these studies to show women are valid gamers, even though the gate keepers of gaming will not likely believe the studies anyhow.
It's a shame that the gate keepers of gamers are, bluntly, deluded enough to think that people like being forcibly marginalized, and on top of that should be quiet about it.
for quite a while PS3 was the cheapest blue-ray player around and people bought them for that. Same deal with DVDs and PS2 though that probably is less relevant nowadays. I also know some people that do not use their Xboxes for gaming but only for Netflix. (they game on PC instead).undeadsuitor said:what the fuck would you use a gaming console for other than gaming?
I mean, I know some consoles run hot enough to cook an egg on but just because girls own consoles doesnt mean theyre cooking on them exactly.
This is just more pointless goal post shifting.
except that people explicitly mentioned guys buying consoles for non-gaming reasons.....Worgen said:It's pretty easy to see with most posters doubting the data or suggesting that just because one owns a console, doesn't mean they use it for gaming. It's just another way of saying "fake gamer girls."
yes, you could, but as far as i see there was none of that in this study. thats the point of that paragraph.Corey Schaff said:I feel like you could solve this problem with a few more questions; how many people in your household, what are their genders, which of them plays the console.Strazdas said:i do wonder how did they account for families? Families tend to share gaming devices. Could not find that in their methodology. thous would have a significant impact in making both genders closer to each-other because no matter which member of the family answered the phone they would say they have a console.
I get called a "fake gamer" for playing on PC and refusing to buy an XBOne this year.Worgen said:I like how quickly this thread went right to the whole "fake gamer girl" thing without actually calling that. Is there anything that guys get called "fake" for?