To paraphrase some things, and then address them:
1) "Sedentary recreational activities, in excess, cause obesity"
In theory, yes, in practice, no; exercise does increase metabolic needs (both directly and through the requirements needed to support the increased muscle mass)... yet, though we get more exercise in recent times than 40 years ago (this is well established), our obesity rate is higher. Thermodynamically, the only explanation would be increased consumption - which, again, is well supported.
It's not surprising that a society that likes to blame the dopamine-agonists (cocaine, nicotine, opiates, amphetamines, in roughly that order) for the addiction has something of an unbreakable addiction with a powerful dopaminergic drug, quickly metabolized food, but it is the problem.
2) "We can crackdown on gangs effectively"
Well, yeah, China showed us this... then again, and this is a false dichotomy, I think I'd prefer the gangs to what China had to do.
(Far more effective methods are available, (think "defunding") but we'll have to wait a while for the downfall of the economy to make them attractive...)
3) "We can eliminate the gangs by separating them from the host"
Propose specific programs so we can laugh at them.
4) "Women are identical to men!"
Yeah, whatever... fathers having a significant role in raising children, beyond contributing genes, is about as young as the Holocene. That's a mere 10,000 years or so for evolutionary pressures to teach men parenting skills, although they had an advantage (serial monogamy being closer to the goal than any of the r-type mating strategies)
And, guess what - there are significant aptitude differences between men and women.
I don't get it anyways... effective child-bearing is what makes humans humans. How the fuck is it an insult to suggest that someone should preserve the foundation of our culture?
1) "Sedentary recreational activities, in excess, cause obesity"
In theory, yes, in practice, no; exercise does increase metabolic needs (both directly and through the requirements needed to support the increased muscle mass)... yet, though we get more exercise in recent times than 40 years ago (this is well established), our obesity rate is higher. Thermodynamically, the only explanation would be increased consumption - which, again, is well supported.
It's not surprising that a society that likes to blame the dopamine-agonists (cocaine, nicotine, opiates, amphetamines, in roughly that order) for the addiction has something of an unbreakable addiction with a powerful dopaminergic drug, quickly metabolized food, but it is the problem.
2) "We can crackdown on gangs effectively"
Well, yeah, China showed us this... then again, and this is a false dichotomy, I think I'd prefer the gangs to what China had to do.
(Far more effective methods are available, (think "defunding") but we'll have to wait a while for the downfall of the economy to make them attractive...)
3) "We can eliminate the gangs by separating them from the host"
Propose specific programs so we can laugh at them.
4) "Women are identical to men!"
Yeah, whatever... fathers having a significant role in raising children, beyond contributing genes, is about as young as the Holocene. That's a mere 10,000 years or so for evolutionary pressures to teach men parenting skills, although they had an advantage (serial monogamy being closer to the goal than any of the r-type mating strategies)
And, guess what - there are significant aptitude differences between men and women.
I don't get it anyways... effective child-bearing is what makes humans humans. How the fuck is it an insult to suggest that someone should preserve the foundation of our culture?