http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-14340470 is what I was talking about.dogstile said:Technically, aren't we all? I mean, none of us are in that much of a negative.Shamanic Rhythm said:Still, the fact that they are holding more cash than the US means they'll survive this hurdle.
Seriously, as tempting as it is to diss Jobs' influence as merely being about encasing everything in white, putting 'i' on the front of it and sticking a high pricetag on to complete the product, he was actually one of the most shrewd businessmen of the century, both in terms of helping Wozniack pioneer the original Macintosh - which, once upon a time, was actually more powerful than the competition, as implausible as that seems today - and also in ushering in the age of the smartphone and the mp3 player. Of course he didn't invent them, but when so many industry leaders are petrified of taking any kind of risk Jobs deserves credit for investing in unproven tech. People sometimes forget that when the iPod first came out, Apple were almost a non-entity in the tech world, having been utterly dominated in the market by Microsoft. It takes a lot of guts for a CEO to invest money in a new direction at the best of times, let alone when you're on the back foot.
That said, the company has now gotten so big and faceless and uncaring towards the quality of their individual products that the above is all the grace I'm prepared to extend towards him.