Absolutely.CorvusFerreum said:The Problem is not that it's allways russia as enemy, the problem is more the focus on the USA (or the west in general) as the good side.
I mean there are a lot of conflicts in the world, that would make a good framework for an fps. Like Pakistan-India (or Pakistan in generell), Taiwan-China, Russia-tchechenia, Eritrea and many more. They would not require any americasn character and would make far more realistic scenarios then most modern fps have.
How do you think Germany feels about always being forced to be Nazis in WWII shooters?Soviet Heavy said:And the Middle East for that matter. Big time war games are always about blowing up insane modern day Soviets or some vague Middle Eastern country. And I'm sick of it.
It's not any more ridiculous than a whole lot of other concepts that we never even seem to question (like how a single man can lead us to victory in a war or how in RTS's it always seems to be that the fate of humanity will be forever changed because of the outcome of a single small skirmish).The full scale war that is shown in these games is ludicrous in today's era of warfare. That it is always about the United States taking on the Russians like the Cold War never ended just makes it more ridiculous.
Like Lobstermen vs. Roman Centurions?If we are going to make some balls out stupid gung ho action shooter military game, why are we limiting the global war to the US and Russia? If it is so over the top, why not come up with some equally stupid entertaining premise?
Hey! What's your beef with Canada? (besides, we already know that Canada would win, they burned the White House down before after all)USA versus Canada
What's your fixation on the USA always being involved?USA versus the Ocean Men
You have a problem with USA vs. Russia yet USA vs. Eastern Europe is fine? (you are aware that Russia happens to be in Eastern Europe, right?)USA versus the Eastern European potential crossdressing supervillain
And watch as no-one outside of the US gets too worked up about that idea and sits there scratching their heads going 'which side is supposed to be the bad guys again?'.USA versus USA: Republicans versus Democrats in a fight to the death.
I wouldn't say Russia vs. USA is completely fucking stupid.All of these are about as likely as a full scale war with Russia, as in, completely fucking stupid.
Because the 'old grudges' had a lot of movies made about them which are nostalgic to a lot of people (even into the late 90's we had 'Soviets' as generic villains in stuff like Bond films and video games even though we weren't in a conflict with Russia and the Soviet Union wasn't really around anymore).But fun regardless. Just, why pick on your old grudges when you could make something else as equally idiotic?
Get over yourself, it has nothing to do with grudges, it has to do with the fact that Russia is the only country that could actually stand up the the USA in a full out war. The US has the second largest standing military next to China who is financially tied to the US in a way that they would suffer more from a war then they would staying where they are. The European countries are equally tied to the US which leave Russia as the only realistic opponent to the US.Soviet Heavy said:And the Middle East for that matter. Big time war games are always about blowing up insane modern day Soviets or some vague Middle Eastern country. And I'm sick of it.
The full scale war that is shown in these games is ludicrous in today's era of warfare. That it is always about the United States taking on the Russians like the Cold War never ended just makes it more ridiculous.
If we are going to make some balls out stupid gung ho action shooter military game, why are we limiting the global war to the US and Russia? If it is so over the top, why not come up with some equally stupid entertaining premise?
USA versus Canada
USA versus the Ocean Men
USA versus the Eastern European potential crossdressing supervillain
USA versus USA: Republicans versus Democrats in a fight to the death.
All of these are about as likely as a full scale war with Russia, as in, completely fucking stupid.
But fun regardless. Just, why pick on your old grudges when you could make something else as equally idiotic?
Iron Mal said:Technically Britain burned down the white house, Canada wasn't a country until 1867, but other then that playing as Canada would be awesome!!Soviet Heavy said:snip
May be a bit of a stretch but in Battlefield 1942 you could do a campaign as the Axis fighting as German and Japanese soldiers.keideki said:Somehow I get the feeling that a WWII game from the Axis side is not going to happen for awhile yet.
How about the UK? I'm a solid Brit, but I would certaintly buy a game with the UK and the US fighting.RyanBishop said:Well, personally, I think that there is the fact that the USA only had conflicts with a few other countries/regions/nations EVER. Nazi Germany, 'Nam, Japan, the USSR, the MidEast.
Now let's take a look:
Nazi Germany? Well, that puts a game in WWII mode. Done to death. Modern-day Germany? Piss poor way to uphold the good relationships with NATO allies. Same applies to every European country.
'Nam? Uhhhhh... again, history-based shooter - yeah. Modern day - nope. No way, Jose. There's nothing in 'Nam these days. It was the Soviet influence that made 'Nam... well, 'Nam!
Japan? Again, no use, because today Japan is a valuable partner to the US of A, and frankly speaking, most people see Japan as a high-tech land of anime, mechs, and other cool stuff. Not to mention its' recent mishaps with the forces of nature - who would want to pick on them?
This basically leaves the Middle East (no country specified - game devs don't really care for details... bearded guys in burkas with AK's - epic villain image) and the former USSR (read: Russia, since most of the former USSR satellite states are now part of Europe).
Canadians? Aussies? Mexicans? Nah, again, this boils down to either a touchy topic based on existing issues with the country (not enough to trigger a full scale conflict, mind) or a case of partnership, that no one wants to cast a shadow on.
The MidEastern setting is running out of its time now. People are getting sick of that crap. So the devs bring up a formidable foe: the Eeeeevil Russians! Because Russia is still seen by some... ehm, more "intelligent" Americans, as a counterpart and/or global rival, the plot of the conflict makes perfect sense in a nice modern-day "alternative history-2-future" way.
That shit sells. And it is the way it is. Nothing much can stop the devs from picking on the Russians. Unless a new, better global conflict comes up in reality. Then the focus will shift.
On a side note - I live in Moscow, I am a born Russian, although I did spend most of my childhood in the States. I love both countries in an equal way, I think, and that way it kind of bummers me out to play as either side of the US-Russian conflict. But hell, what can a guy do? Not play a good game just because of the stupid plot? Fuck that, I like me my CoD and BF and stuff.
So I guess the rational thing here would be just to deal with it.
Err, Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad?...Qitz said:May be a bit of a stretch but in Battlefield 1942 you could do a campaign as the Axis fighting as German and Japanese soldiers.keideki said:Somehow I get the feeling that a WWII game from the Axis side is not going to happen for awhile yet.
As for something else to fight, why start now? We've been shooting Russians, Aliens and various Middle Eastern people for a while now.
Interesting idea there, for some reason I have not yet thought of, the United States ends up in a war with the European countries, something they did maybe, not going over well with the rest of the Western world, an argument getting out of hand, some extremists trying to sabotage something on US soil, whatever it is, the United States invades, most likely through France or Spain, wait... I'm just describing the backstory of Endwar. Well, I really liked the backstory of Endwar, at least before they pulled a "the russians did it".tzimize said:South Park did USA vs Canada already, and in a way no game can top.
That said I wouldnt mind seeing a game where USA was the bad guy. Change of pace, yes please.
That said I really dont care. Wargames have little interest to me, and individual stories are usually more compelling than national ones anyway.
The Russian thing does annoy me because the Cold War ended a long time ago. However, it is worth remembering that in most of the games where you fight Russians your main enemies are not the Russian government in themselves. For example in the Modern Warfare series. In the first one, you fight Russian separatists and at times actively work with the Russian military against them. In the second, you do fight the Russian military, but they themselves are being manipulated behind the scenes by Makarov and Shepard, who are your main antagonists.Soviet Heavy said:And the Middle East for that matter. Big time war games are always about blowing up insane modern day Soviets or some vague Middle Eastern country. And I'm sick of it.
Apart from the fact that in Killzone all of the 'Nazi's' were British We've had a long history of being made the bad-guy's too, and it get's particularly offensive when we're being compared to the people we fought in WW2.XMark said:What we really need is more space Nazis. Worked all right in the Killzone series.