Study Claims Profanity Causes Aggression

Psychedelic Spartan

New member
Sep 15, 2011
458
0
0
I hear profanity all the time, like any 14 year old child. I'm not a violent kid. I've gotten into one fight at school in my life and he had it coming. I took my shoes off in the park for a moment, because I hurt my foot playing baseball. (If you're wondering it was an end of year field trip.) He took my shoes, which were brand new and cost $100. And what did he do? He put them on the edge of a trash can. I tried to climb the fence, and every time he pulled me down. Eventually, I had enough and punched him in the face, breaking his glasses. Other than that though, I'm not a violent kid.
 

Dr Jones

Join the Bob Dylan Fangroup!
Jun 23, 2010
819
0
0
Well i swear pretty much cause it's the spice of language! Anyone who thinks swearing is bad is, in the words of Stephen Fry, f****** lunatic.
(Stephen fry on swearing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_osQvkeNRM )
 

Liquid Paradox

New member
Jul 19, 2009
303
0
0
This just in! Somewhere, people are making hilarious wild assumptions! Did it never occure to you that violent kids are more likely to swear? Rather then the other way around? because violent people tend to have behavior which is far less socially acceptable then a few bad words, and therefor don't really care if they insult granny smith?

Just a thought.
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
Let's say this is true - 100%.

Tourette's sufferers with coprolalia would be sociopaths.

And as far as I'm aware, two people who don't swear very much are Chris Eubanks and Frank Bruno.

(Americans: Think Hulk Hogan/The Undertaker)

Now they're quite violent without swearing at all.

Mick Foley...

rarely swears.
 

Lancer873

New member
Oct 10, 2009
520
0
0
OF COURSE. X correlates to Y so therefore Y MUST be caused by X! THERE IS NO OTHER POSSIBLE EXPLANATION! BEGONE YE HEATHENS WHO SPEAK OTHERWISE!
 

Robert Ewing

New member
Mar 2, 2011
1,977
0
0
Doesn't this rather... Go without saying? Kids are impressionable, they have an entire development process revolving around how impressionable they are, it's called learning.
 

I.N.producer

New member
May 26, 2011
170
0
0
I noticed problems with this study.

First: the university that did the study forbids swearing. This could be considered as bias. Not to an extreme level,but possibly a bit.

Second: This is a correlational study. It is not scientifically correct to draw a definite conclusion from one correlational study. It takes many, many, many more.

Third: The whole link from profanity to aggression that they "established" was a slippery slope argument. From the BYU site: "When youth both hear and then try profanity out for themselves it can start a downward slide toward more aggressive behavior.?
 

SFR

New member
Mar 26, 2009
322
0
0
Profanity causes aggression? That makes me FUCKING ANGRY!!!!!!!!
 

Char-Nobyl

New member
May 8, 2009
784
0
0
Andy Chalk said:
"Profanity is kind of like a stepping stone. You don't go to a movie, hear a bad word, and then go shoot somebody. But when youth both hear and then try profanity out for themselves it can start a downward slide toward more aggressive behavior," said BYU family professor and study Dr. Sarah Coyne, who refrains from swearing herself due to an "honor code" at the university that forbids the use of naughty language by both students at staff.
This is a textbook slippery slope argument. She's trying to assert that hearing a small number of words will somehow cause a person to become violent and aggressive.

Or, alternatively, she's confusing cause and effect: people who curse more often tend to watch movies/shows or play games that have more cursing in them, and any personality they have has developed largely independent of what they watch/play. Maybe cursing more is a byproduct of who they already are as people.

Because, let's face it: kids don't turn emo after they cut themselves, nor are the razor blades responsible for them being emo.

Andy Chalk said:
But as usual, not everyone agrees with Coyne's conclusions. Psychology professor Dr. Timothy Jay of the Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts said the assumption that language can harm kids is without any basis and noted that previous research has demonstrated that words, including the bad ones, can actually have a beneficial effect.

"There is literature that shows the prosocial effects of media on children, the authors ignore these reports," he told Fox News [http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/10/17/swearing-on-tv-linked-to-teen-aggression/]. "The authors make no case for profanity being beneficial, as in humor elicitation, or social bonding, or as a coping mechanism, or as a relief from pain."
I'm noticing a pattern in Escapist articles: call my cynical, but it seems like they're posting the same inflammatory bylines that you'd expect for an advocate of the topic, but then they end with a refutation of everything prior. It's starting to feel like a tabloid that ends all of its articles about alien abductions by adding, "Yeah, because that sure seems likely." Trying to have your cake and eat it, I think the phrase is.
 

Zeraki

WHAT AM I FIGHTING FOOOOOOOOR!?
Legacy
Feb 9, 2009
1,615
45
53
New Jersey
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Gasp!

Children exposed to profanity are more likely to use it themselves!?



Never mind the fact that most kids are often exposed to profanity by their own parents.
 

Eve Charm

New member
Aug 10, 2011
760
0
0
hmmmm well lately the words " online pass " have been causing more angry and rage then any profanity around her :p
 

puffenstuff

New member
Jan 31, 2008
65
0
0
Sigh. Correlation does not imply causation. I can't be bothered to look at the original report right now but if the researchers really are saying that the correlation between cursing in video games and aggressive behavior implies that cursing causes the aggressive behavior.... well someone should be taking a hard look at how they got PhDs. It is basic scientific method.

People with aggressive tendencies might prefer games with cursing, or both the aggression and the choice of game might be caused by a third factor.
 

Cactoos

New member
Dec 14, 2010
15
0
0
Sooo, lets me get this straight: they asked 223 normal teenagers about their cursing and entertainment preferences and deducted from the answers that profanity in media causes profanity in real life. Fair enough, that's reasonable to assume even without any testing...

But where the fuck did they get the reliable information about the tested teenagers' "aggressive behavior" -tendencies? I mean, Christ, someone already pointed out that most people swear (well, it IS an assumption, I guess, but come on) and surely most people at least watch movies for their daily share of profanity...

Even that huge chance of coincidence aside, only 223 test-subjects?

Seriously.
 

bobajob

New member
Jun 24, 2011
90
0
0
Swear all the time at home and around friends, but I only ever hit out at 3 people in my whole lifetime (28Y.O.) and they were all blatant cases of self-defence, I never hit first (I don't dick around much...) and I've been gaming since I was old enough to type "run" commands into a zx spectrum (let's say 23 years), so.... Meh.
Y u no real scientist?
 

mxfox408

Pee Eye Em Pee Daddy
Apr 4, 2010
478
0
0
No shit, why the fuck would anyone think otherwise? They dont make R rated movies and M rated games for adults only for nothing. This study is a waste of fucken money and time.