Study Declares Dead Space 2 "Scariest 360 Game"

EdgeyX

Realms of Randomness
Mar 18, 2009
97
0
0
I've only played the first Dead Space and didn't really think it was scary at all, and I can't really imagen the second one being that different. If only Amnesia was on there, I only played the demo and it freaked me out more than any game i've played before.
 

icame

New member
Aug 4, 2010
2,649
0
0
Brb, beating my head against my desk

...


Okay, done. The dead space games are decent action games but I consider them in the running for worst horror games in existence. Even Left 4 dead is more scary then those games. Also why the hell are there only 4 games? Where the hell are the rest of the 360's survival horror library.
 

Motakikurushi

New member
Jul 22, 2009
370
0
0
Nope. It's Condemned. If you didn't find Condemned scary, then I'm sorry to say that you don't exist. You may want to fix that problem. Dead Space 2 tries so hard to be John Carpenter's 'The Thing' that it's almost sad, and that film was more gratuitously disgusting than genuinely scary. Wait, is Resident Evil 5 on that list? As in that hilarious, racially-insensitive, boulder-punching romp? It's intense, yeah, but not scary. Get rid of this and Alan Wake (good, atmospheric game but not scary), add F.E.A.R. 1/2 or BioShock.
 

DirtyMagic

New member
Mar 18, 2011
250
0
0
Pfff, what competition this was. I freakin' loved Dead Space 2 though.
But Dead Space 2 was more OMG THAT'S COOL instead of scary in my opinion.
I mean, did anyone REALLY jump when the orderly got attacked in the intro?
I only thought: wow, look at the freakin' awesome graphics on that Necromorph dude trying to eat my face!

The only scary game from that list was Condemned.
That was way worse than Dead Space 2, it was not even all THAT scary though. Just a few parts that made me jump really really hard.
It was more the intense atmosphere that got me.

I'll never forgive the game for the mannequin sequence though.
THE MANNEQUIN SCENE!!!!

 

Dr Jones

Join the Bob Dylan Fangroup!
Jun 23, 2010
819
0
0
AwesomeFerret said:
I notice they didn't include Amnesia: The Dark Descent, which probably skewed the results a bit, because from what I hear, that game is way scarier then Dead Space 2 is.

EDIT: Sorry, a typo was bugging me.
Yep cuz its a 360 game
 

BoredDragon

New member
Feb 9, 2011
1,097
0
0
I said it before and I'll say it again, but this time in computer psuedo code :D

(jump_scares || gore) != horror

Besides, why is Resident Evil 5 even on the list when none of the original Silent Hill games or Amnesia are on there? That's like putting Evil Dead 3 in a list of Horror films and leaving out Psycho and Nightmare on Elm Street.

btw I'm not ragging on Resident Evil 5 or Army of Darkness, I love them both so much because they're so hilarious :p
 

zerobudgetgamer

New member
Apr 5, 2011
297
0
0
How do these people get funding?? Seriously?? Yesterday it was the study to link "aggression" to video games based on how "loudly" you yelled at the screen, and now we've got these dumb fops trying to find what's "scariest" among four of the most heavily advertised games in the current console gen, NOT the entire (survival) horror genre.

This is aggravating, even moreso when you consider someone thought this was a good idea/valid study and gave these idiots money!
 

estoria-etnia

New member
Aug 22, 2009
131
0
0
*head to wall* Owww...

Wait, how come Fatal Frame does not count? Weren't at least the first two games re-released for the XBox? Those games... *twitches* They terrify me, but I love them anyway. <3
 

Sacman

Don't Bend! Ascend!
May 15, 2008
22,661
0
0
Flailing Escapist said:
Unlikely. Dead Space was much more frightning than Dead Space 2, it was also quite a bit longer. And any other Resident Evil game is scarier than Re5. I personally thought Condemned: Crimminal Origins was the best of the bunch, but thats just my 2 cents.

Edit: Dooooop, 360, 360, 360, 360, 360, 360. Still DS1 was worse than DS2 in my own opinion and C:CO was worst than that
Yeah, Condemned made me cry like a little girl... but than again lots of things can do that...
 

SillyNilly

New member
Sep 17, 2009
150
0
0
I'm kind of iffy on the results of this study.

The study examining physical responses of 6 individuals, of questionable backgrounds, and of such a short time slot makes me think the bearing of the study was focused on how 'casual & core gamers' react differently to varying levels of control in gameplay.

In this case, a more cinematic experience correlates to the casual group being endemic to the feeling elicited by the lack of control and provoking physical responses with it, and the core group having the opposite physical response to the feeling of control, or otherwise the reaction to the nature of cutscenes as separate to the gameplay.

I'm a bit peeved over not seeing how the vertical scale was labeled, or if it was accurately measured. What factors they've taken into consideration is nice to hear, but I'd rather see how the game progresses to interact and produce the intended effect, or in this case how the study sees the bits that provoked the user.

My personal experience with DS 2 had been in a similar allotted 30 minute time slot because I had played the demo. Although I had predisposed knowledge of the game and understood the scare tactics used in the framework of level progression, I kept my cool. My reaction to Necros popping out of the woodwork plateaued after the first few, and the cutscenes were no exception.

-----

After doing a bit of poking around on the internet, found out that a publication will be release in the June edition of OXM magazine.

http://www.verticalslice.co.uk/blog/?p=241
 

lycanthrope008

New member
Aug 24, 2010
25
0
0
Dead Space is only scare because of the cheap scares after awhile it gets old but If you never played it before of course it is scary, paraphrasing someone who post on the dead space 2 post on the escapist forum "the first time it was scary after that it was funny "
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
Hmmm, interesting. To be honest though I think half the point of such studies is that people are rarely honest about what scares them. Something like "Dead Space 2" is the kind of somewhat goofy game that looked at objectively shouldn't be considered scary, especially to a genere veteran, but then again when you measure things scientifically and find out what people are really thinking, you get a differant result.

To be honest the results shouldn't surprise anyone, given that you have a lot of marketing people behind the production of games like this, who draw on all kinds of data similar to this study in order to determine the path of game design, a fairly big budget game like "Dead Space 2" probably drew on a lot of experience in being put together.

There is also the whole "nerd culture" aspect of things, especially among the hardcore. That is to say the tendency to want to say "this kind of thing isn't scary" and sing the praises of more cereberal horror because that's what everyone else is doing... but really, in the end that's not what's getting under their skin.

Another point to consider is that actual fans of horror are fairly uncommon. Most people who are, are kind of poseurs about it. These are the guys who lionize Steven King and those who emulate his style to an extent... like oh say "Alan Wake" but at the same time Steven King really isn't scary, especially not anymore. His entire "the best horror isin the mind" doctrine made him popular with those who like the idea of horror, but don't actually want to be scared or made uncomfortable. There have been some analysises of his work done in the past, similar to this one over a period of years, with him and other "pop horror" writers being compared to more fringe writers.

However, it's also noteworthy to point out that being a limited audience, successful horror is never going to be as popular as the stuff that seems like it should be horror, but is really little more than a suspense piece when you get down to it. Within things that actually qualify as horror it can get into some pretty serious debates between what's good, and what's bad.

The whole point of this study is that a lot of people will sit back and go "lol, Dead Space isn't scary, it just has a ton of gore" then ranting about atmosphere, which honestly Dead Space is actually oozing with, and so on, and then maybe going on about how it only has jump out scares. What this study shows is that this is the game that actually likely "got" those people and thus breeded the kind of resentment you see from non-horror fans when they actually run into the real deal, and try and disguise as something else so they don't come accross looking like terrified little girls.

It would be interesting to see what would happen if they were to pay a group of people to play through say the first two Silent Hill Games which are lionized as being "the most terrifying thing out there" and say the two "Dead Space Games" in their entirety under this kind of study. It would be a pretty long term project, we're talking about 20-80 hours of play time here.

I say this because to be honest while Jaded to the point where neither really "got" me, I honestly think Dead Space probably did a better job of actually producing a tight horror experience, where Silent Hill rarely progressed beyond the "creepy" level. Both being quite good games, but if your going to rate them as horror, well I think Silent Hill is more an exercise in surrealism than actual horror. Truthfully I think the two worst reviewed series installments, "The Room" and "Homecoming" actually came the closest to being actual horror games, and sometimes I suspect that is why they are among the least popular of the bunch.
 

mitchell271

New member
Sep 3, 2010
1,457
0
0
AwesomeFerret said:
I notice they didn't include Amnesia: The Dark Descent, which probably skewed the results a bit, because from what I hear, that game is way scarier then Dead Space 2 is.

EDIT: Sorry, a typo was bugging me.
it's a PC exclusive. for now