ssgt splatter said:
NO. Really? You can become addicted to video games? I didn't know that. :O
And by "I didn't know that" I mean WHERE THE F*** HAVE YOU IDIOTS BEEN THE PAST 20+ YEARS!?
Did you really need to conduct a scientific expirement for that one? Using the tax payers money? Money that could've been used for finding the cure for cancer or solving world hunger I might add! I mean really, you probably could've asked an 8-year-old on that one!
...
...
Whew! I needed that.
Ok, slow the hell down, there. I know it seems pretty obvious, and yeah everyone who'd think about it for 2 seconds can see the logic in every kind of entertainment being addictive, but this is science. In science you can't claim a theory is fact unless you've conducted a study proving said theory's fact (for the time being). Now I do realise that research conducted in the field of social studies gets a lot of these "Duh, we knew that already!" responses, because everyone's social in this community.
It's indeed a lot different from, say, neurology. You wouldn't just say a neurologist was a dimwitted idiot because everyone knew all along it was pretty obvious that the medulla oblongata was positioned underneath mesencephalon, would you? Of course you wouldn't because not everyone's a neurologist.
Funnily enough everyone does consider themselves a specialist on the field of social studies, which is why people like you think everyone and their grandma already know all about how dogs positively affect family bonding or whatever.
I'm also fairly confident a study like this is mostly done by surveys, maybe a couple interviews. So don't worry, I think your Cure Cancer, Solve World Hunger Study can miss the couple hundred dollars that went into this one.
I also see Matt's already been good enough to clarify the scientific approach. Just felt like elaborating a little.