Study Says Gamers Are Bad Drivers

Recommended Videos
Mar 9, 2010
2,722
0
0
Jack and Calumon said:
Wow, this has made me feel so much better about me driving this year. I've heard questions due to my autism, how I might not be tall enough and how I'm tired most of the time and now apparently video games make me a worse driver.

Well shit. And my latest Driving game wasn't exactly something that you could shrug off as educational. Burnout Paradise Ultimate Box. I feel screwed, royally.

Calumon: Aww nuts. Now I can't go to the Bakery with him. He'll crash and I'll hurt my nose! : (
Have you seen some of the guys one step away from an amoeba driving vehicles with a big 'flammable' sticker peeling off the back? Trust me, if those guys can get a normal license and a license to drive vehicles with dangerous chemicals in them, you will be able to pass. Also, phone books were made for us short people to sit on.

OT: Yeah, those numbers still aren't a majority of people so I'm pretty sure I'll be fine. Most drivers in the UK, gamer or non-gamer, don't obey the rules of the road when they've passed their test. Statistics mean nothing to the individual anyway.
 

Ken Sapp

Cat Herder
Apr 1, 2010
510
0
0
The question is are they trying to use this to blame reckless driving on games? Or that those who are more inclined to drive recklessly are also more likely to play racing games?
 

BoogieManFL

New member
Apr 14, 2008
1,284
0
0
I'm a hardcore gamer and I'm a far better driver than most people. A lot of people don't use or incorrectly use their turn signals, change lanes while turning across an intersection, don't properly stop and obey yield signs, etc etc. I've been driving for 14 years and I've never gotten a ticket/warning. I've never been pulled over at all.

In fact, playing some more of the more realistic racing games helped better understand how cars behave when they have either low traction or lose it all together. Once when I got ran off the road by someone screwing around with something on their passenger floorboard, and another when I lost traction on an icy road.

EDIT: It really can't be broadly accepted either. It does depend on the region and it's driving conditions. I've lived in Indiana and Florida and there are notable differences in driving habits.

In Indiana, people were probably a little better about properly signaling and driving less aggressive. However, they seemed to speed more. Also didn't seem to yield to pedestrians as much.

In Florida, I don't usually see a lot of speeders, but when they do speed they REALLY speed. Second, a lot more poor/non-existent use of signaling and far more illegal passing, road rage, tailgating and other aggressive methods. However they seem very pleasant to pedestrians and bike riders. And usually when you signal someone will let you in.

Though, and this is not racism or whatever, just fact - there are a lot of people from Puerto Rico here and from what I've heard from people who lived there, there was basically no driving laws outside of full cities. People drive where ever and how ever they want. So that could be part of the cause here. Also, Florida is covered in lakes, streams, wetlands and things like that so the roads then to be quite curvy so there is less chance to pass the slow pokes which will irritate some people.
 

IamQ

New member
Mar 29, 2009
5,223
0
0
I've never seen how people drive in the U.K, so I don't really have anything to say here.

But if it was made in France, then I would have called bullshit. Everyone behind the wheel in France is batshit-bonkers!

If it's a green light, drive. If it's yellow, drive. If it only recently turned red, drive. If it's red, but you don't want to stop...drive.

Those cars never stop for pedestrians!
 
Apr 28, 2008
14,628
0
0
Daemascus said:
Maybe we are just more honest.
What he said.

I live in Vermont, and HOLY SHIT you wouldn't believe the amount of bad driver here. Hell its a miracle when someone remembers to use their blinker.
 

trophykiller

New member
Jul 23, 2010
426
0
0
danpascooch said:
I don't believe it.

I personally am a very skilled driver. I just really like bitchin' powerslides on snowy roads.
Glad I'm not the only one. Also, I hate racing games, so does this apply to me?
 

Talminator

New member
Aug 5, 2009
5
0
0
Bah, I never trust these kinds of surveys. They don't take into account age, or the fact that there are significantly more non-gamers than gamers, that not all incidents are caught by the police, OR the fact that a large majority of gamers are of a younger generation than the non-gamers, and subsequently have been driving for less time and are bound to make more mistakes. Had this survey come out 30 years ago when platform shoes came into fashion, similar results would have been observed, with younger, more inexperienced drivers making more mistakes. Were platform shoes to blame? No, simply the fact that the accused have been driving for less time than the accusors.

They (the media) are always out to try and ban gaming, simply because it's a new and innovative industry that's undergone such an enormous growth that it could soon become a serious threat to the conventional media network (TV, magazines, radio) and cost them their precious jobs.

Call me a cynic, but I just generally don't trust these sorts of surveys.
 

SilverUchiha

New member
Dec 25, 2008
1,602
0
0
Thrust said:
LOL, I've been driving for 4 years and I've never had a ticket yet.
I'm soon to be starting year 5 and, as of writing, no accident or tickets yet. I think this study might be biased in some way.
 

Zechnophobe

New member
Feb 4, 2010
1,077
0
0
I think you guys are being a bit defensive here. Just look at the numbers for what they are. The study shows that gamers reported doing these acts more than non gamers.

The 'gamers are bad drivers' is just the editorial title given by the Escapist. Assuming equal honesty rates, this means gamers are likely to take more risks while driving. Assuming equal risk taking, this means gamers are more likely to report truth about there driving.

This study has only these datapoints, don't freak out. Oh, and don't assume that just because you THINK you are a good driver means you are. It is quite possible that you aren't, or even worse, that you are a bit better than normal, but because you believe you are much better, you take more risks than is actually safe.

Just saying, don't blow this out of proportion and try not to let your biases get the better of you.
 

imperialreign

New member
Mar 23, 2010
348
0
0
Funny - I haven't had a ticket in near on 8 years . . . I have positive points on my driving record, too . . . plus, I've never been in an accident . . . and have been driving 15 years now.

I guess, being a gamer and all, Murphy's Law should be catching up to me any moment, right?




When will this inane, tepid, tedious "studies" regarding "gamers" and their negative impact on the world come to an end?
 

ryo02

New member
Oct 8, 2007
818
0
0
Jack and Calumon said:
Calumon: Aww nuts. Now I can't go to the Bakery with him. He'll crash and I'll hurt my nose! : (
but you dont have a nose o_O ... how do you smell

I dont drive and have no plans to learn I wouldnt trust myself in something big heavy and made of metal with an engine. if my time in gta4 and saints row 2 is anything to go by Id suck royally I go through so many cars. so no driving for me rest easy the roads are safe from me.
 

The Random One

New member
May 29, 2008
3,310
0
0
I do believe this one. Staying inside a car gives a person a sense of detachment that is not all that different from playing a game. And I remember when my friend was getting his driver's licence he said he turned corners too widely because he was thinking of how he did it in GTA (the latter ultrarealistic installment hadn't come out yet, it might've helped).

Personally I don't drive and I don't even like cars very much, except for replicas and video games. Kind of like guns now that I think about it.

VROOOOOM
 

viranimus

Thread killer
Nov 20, 2009
4,951
0
0
Yet at the same time, gamers on average pass their driver's license test with fewer attempts than non-gamers and also suffer fewer fender-benders and other minor incidents.
Ok... so does that not mean gamers are better drivers? Citing things like taking risks, running red lights, getting pulled over etc... those are ancillary to the actual skill of driving. Overall, I dont think its that gamers make bad drivers.. I think the real problem is all the non gamers with horrid reaction times, panic, and failing understanding of how to control a vehicle are clogging up our roads and getting in our way.
 

Zechnophobe

New member
Feb 4, 2010
1,077
0
0
imperialreign said:
Funny - I haven't had a ticket in near on 8 years . . . I have positive points on my driving record, too . . . plus, I've never been in an accident . . . and have been driving 15 years now.

I guess, being a gamer and all, Murphy's Law should be catching up to me any moment, right?




When will this inane, tepid, tedious "studies" regarding "gamers" and their negative impact on the world come to an end?
So... you think the data they have is made up? They just pulled numbers out of the air? Just because you, claim, to be a good driver doesn't mean the study is wrong. Even if 45% of gamer respondents cited Road Rage, you could easily be in the 55%.

And even then, did you read through the list of questions and consider how many of those you've done?
 

Android2137

New member
Feb 2, 2010
813
0
0
Hey! It took me only one try to pass my driver's exam! Though truthfully, I was always afraid of driving, so I was on my learner's permit for a long time before I finally took the test... And the only reason why I took the test was so I could get my license, not drive for a good several years, and thus have cheaper insurance when I finally consider driving a necessity... And the guy testing me was so much more relaxed than I expected him to be... to the point where I found myself arguing with him at the end about whether or not I should fail (I was the one who said I should technically have failed... There were unexpected and extenuating circumstances which was why he gave me leeway...) I wonder if I have problems...
 

Nukey

Elite Member
Apr 24, 2009
4,125
0
41
Well excuse me for trying to get extra-points, those kids are worth like 20 points, after all...
 

Pumpkinmancer

The Pumpkin is our salvation!
Sep 20, 2010
86
0
0
There is also a study about the leading cause of blindness, sterilely, and hairy palms in men. There is another one that concludes gamers will shoot people at work and school if they get depressed.

A quiz of 2000 people hardly constitutes as a scientific study with verifiable and usable scientific data. What habits constituted the 'gamers' as gamers, and the nongamers and nongamers for example. Where do these 2000 people live, were they in the same city, same county, throughout the country? Was their income level, level of education, and careers diversified? It may be that their sample was flawed to begin with.

Their results are interesting and intriguing to be sure, but ultimately useless on a stand alone basis.
 

Jodah

New member
Aug 2, 2008
2,280
0
0
I'm gunna go out on a limb and say that the majority of the "gamer half" we closer to the 18 years of age end of the spectrum whereas the "non-gamer half" were closer to 39. Until they get two groups of the same age (not a 20+ year range) this study is bovine excrement.
 

imperialreign

New member
Mar 23, 2010
348
0
0
Zechnophobe said:
So... you think the data they have is made up? They just pulled numbers out of the air? Just because you, claim, to be a good driver doesn't mean the study is wrong. Even if 45% of gamer respondents cited Road Rage, you could easily be in the 55%.
. . . and simply because I claim otherwise to the study doesn't mean it's right, either. Studies can be (and many times are) inherently biased towards a sepcific demographic. People will see only what they want to see, many times as well the results can be skewed because of this.

The study makes no mention as to each groups individual demographics. If the non-gamer half were vast-majority female, while the gamer half were vast-majority male . . . the whole results are garbage. It's already been proven that younger males are more apt to take risks while behind the wheel than younger female drivers. Age comes heavily into play, too - if the gamer half are predominantly 19-28, while the non-gamer half are predominantly 29-39, the results are again skewed. Younger drivers are more apt to take risks, or be more or less at the mercy of their in-experience . . . The study also makes no mention as to if there is a certain "time frame" for previous incidents. If such is the case, older drivers will be more apt to have ticked off every box (due to more time being spent on the road). If the study was only regarding "within the last 6 months to a year," that's a different matter entirelly - again, it makes no point in stating the boundaries of the study itself.

So, under such criteria, I have no choice but to deem this yet another tripe survey. If they want it to be taken seriously, the boundaries for the demographics and actions in question must be rigidly defined . . . otherwise, it's simply a biased opinion. But, it won't stop the media from sensationalising such "results," and will only further continue to fuel the notion and negative image that the mass-media and public have of the gaming population.

That, in itself, can not be tolerated. The gaming population as a whole has become the current media scapegoat.


And even then, did you read through the list of questions and consider how many of those you've done?
Yes, I read through the list . . . and if it makes you fuzzy:


% stopped by police 22 13 - guilty - have been stopped before for defective equipment (light being out or something frivilous), not speeding or breaking a traffic law
% who use mobile when driving 19 12 - not here, my phone is off while driving - I don't engage in such behaviour, and it irritates me when I see others driving while yakking away . . . even more-so when they can obey posted traffic regulations
% ever made a claim for an accident 30 15 - never, even with my close to 500k miles I've racked up since I first obtained my license 15 years ago
% run a red light in last 12mnths 31 14 - never. Having a driver's license (especially in good standing) is mandatory for my field of work. Negative impacts on my record could jeapordize my ability to remin employed, as well as a few work-related licenses I have
% driven wrong way down 1-way street 13 10 - never. one-way roads are clearly posted. Ending up on traveling the wrong way is a clear indication of not paying attention to traffic signs, and a clear indication of being distracted in some way shape, or form. Even if traveling illegally against traffic flow would circumvent miles worth of travel, it's not an excuse
% hit stationary object when parking 22 13 - never. See the above regarding accident claims
% accidently clipped a car but kept quiet 19 11 - never. See above
% take risks (accelerate too quickly, overtake) 44 21 - quite frequently . . . but define "risk." Many such maneuvers I must undergo are to duplicate a customer's concern regarding their vehicle. There's a difference between, though, someone in my situation knowing a vehicles limits and capabilities, and how to compensate for them, and someone who has no idea. Such is simply part of our day-to-day work experiences.
% suffer road rage 45 22 - not to the extent the media protrays "road rage," but, I'll be the first to admit to becoming highly aggitated by other drivers . . . what instigates such frustration, though, are drivers not willing to yield right-of-way, or who are too engrossed by their phones or passengers to pay attention to road signs
% who speed 25 13 - guilty here, but in our region, everyone travels at least 5 miles over the speed limit (if not 10 on major throughways). Our law enforcement officers are even worse, sometimes excessively speeding even on city roads. I've never pushed 15 miles over, though . . . that 15-20 over range is considered "reckless driving" in our state, and you face the possibility of losing your license and/or vehicle, and the possibility of jail time and heavy fines. See above regarding taking a risk that would put my license in jeapordy
% scare others with their driving 26 11 - everyone is guilty of this. There is not one driver out there who hasn't scarred another driver at some point or another un-intentionaly. Now, driving to intentionally scare another driver is a different story, in which case I state not guilty.
Attempts before passing test 2 3 - passed but the written and practicaly driving tests on my first go-round
No. of prangs to their vehicle in last 12months 1 2 -none
 

Plazmatic

New member
May 4, 2009
654
0
0
Zechnophobe said:
I think you guys are being a bit defensive here. Just look at the numbers for what they are. The study shows that gamers reported doing these acts more than non gamers.

The 'gamers are bad drivers' is just the editorial title given by the Escapist. Assuming equal honesty rates, this means gamers are likely to take more risks while driving. Assuming equal risk taking, this means gamers are more likely to report truth about there driving.

This study has only these datapoints, don't freak out. Oh, and don't assume that just because you THINK you are a good driver means you are. It is quite possible that you aren't, or even worse, that you are a bit better than normal, but because you believe you are much better, you take more risks than is actually safe.

Just saying, don't blow this out of proportion and try not to let your biases get the better of you.
Other factors come into play, like, what age demographic is mostlikely to be a "gamer". Younger people. Teens, Young adults, those people play videogames. Its not in causality by video games themselves, its more of a thing to do with um, Idk, YOU JUST STARTED FREAKING DRIVING?!!